Validity and reliability of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest) for primary school children aged 8-11 years.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Richard Tyler, Caitlin Miller, Lisa M Barnett, Stuart J Fairclough, Mhairi J MacDonald
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest) for primary school children aged 8-11 years.","authors":"Richard Tyler, Caitlin Miller, Lisa M Barnett, Stuart J Fairclough, Mhairi J MacDonald","doi":"10.1016/j.jsams.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from 664 primary school children (52.3 % girls; aged 10.0 ± 0.9 years; 80.6 % white British). Children completed the PL-C Quest: 30 pictorial dichotomous items relating to four Physical Literacy (PL) domains (physical, psychological, social, and cognitive). A convenience sub-sample (n = 66, 54.4 % girls; aged 10.1 ± 0.9 years) completed the PL-C Quest again within 10 days. Construct validity (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) and internal consistency (Polychoric Ordinal Alphas) were assessed on the full sample and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation) was assessed on the sub-sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Goodness of fit values for construct validity showed good model fit. All items (PL elements) significantly loaded on domains and all domains significantly loaded on to PL (higher order factor). Nearly all items (28 out of 30) loaded on close or above the standard of λ = 0.3. Removing these two items did not significantly improve model fit. The model was sex- and age-invariant showing evidence of validity for both sexes and school years 4, 5, and 6. The PL-C Quest also showed evidence of good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94) and internal consistency (Pα = 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evidence supports the use of the PL-C Quest to assess perceived PL in school children in England/UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":16992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.03.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest).

Design: Cross-sectional.

Methods: Data were obtained from 664 primary school children (52.3 % girls; aged 10.0 ± 0.9 years; 80.6 % white British). Children completed the PL-C Quest: 30 pictorial dichotomous items relating to four Physical Literacy (PL) domains (physical, psychological, social, and cognitive). A convenience sub-sample (n = 66, 54.4 % girls; aged 10.1 ± 0.9 years) completed the PL-C Quest again within 10 days. Construct validity (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) and internal consistency (Polychoric Ordinal Alphas) were assessed on the full sample and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation) was assessed on the sub-sample.

Results: Goodness of fit values for construct validity showed good model fit. All items (PL elements) significantly loaded on domains and all domains significantly loaded on to PL (higher order factor). Nearly all items (28 out of 30) loaded on close or above the standard of λ = 0.3. Removing these two items did not significantly improve model fit. The model was sex- and age-invariant showing evidence of validity for both sexes and school years 4, 5, and 6. The PL-C Quest also showed evidence of good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94) and internal consistency (Pα = 0.90).

Conclusions: This evidence supports the use of the PL-C Quest to assess perceived PL in school children in England/UK.

研究目的研究旨在为儿童体育素养问卷(PL-C Quest)的有效性和可靠性提供证据:设计:横断面:数据来自 664 名小学生(52.3% 为女生;年龄为 10.0 ± 0.9 岁;80.6% 为英国白人)。儿童完成了 PL-C Quest:30 个与身体素养(PL)四个领域(身体、心理、社会和认知)相关的图形二分法项目。一个方便的子样本(n = 66,54.4% 为女孩;年龄为 10.1 ± 0.9 岁)在 10 天内再次完成了 PL-C Quest。对全部样本进行了结构效度(确证因子分析)和内部一致性(多角度正序字母)评估,对子样本进行了重测可靠性(类内相关)评估:建构效度的拟合优度值显示模型拟合良好。所有项目(PL 要素)都对领域有明显的加载,所有领域都对 PL(高阶因子)有明显的加载。几乎所有项目(30 个中的 28 个)的负荷都接近或高于 λ = 0.3 的标准。删除这两个项目并不能明显改善模型的拟合程度。该模型与性别和年龄无关,表明对男女学生和 4、5、6 年级学生都有效。PL-C Quest还显示出良好的重测可靠性(ICC = 0.94)和内部一致性(Pα = 0.90):这些证据支持使用 PL-C Quest 评估英格兰/英国学龄儿童对 PL 的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is the official journal of Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) and is an an international refereed research publication covering all aspects of sport science and medicine. The Journal considers for publication Original research and Review papers in the sub-disciplines relating generally to the broad sports medicine and sports science fields: sports medicine, sports injury (including injury epidemiology and injury prevention), physiotherapy, podiatry, physical activity and health, sports science, biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor control and learning, sport and exercise psychology, sports nutrition, public health (as relevant to sport and exercise), and rehabilitation and injury management. Manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective with specific applications to sport and exercise and its interaction with health will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信