Acute outcomes and learning curve from the initial patients treated with the PulseSelect system: a real-world multicenter experience of pulsed field ablation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Giulio Molon, Stefano Nardi, Gianfranco Mitacchione, Antonio Dello Russo, Danilo Ricciardi, Roberto Mantovan, Luca Bontempi, Alessandro Costa, Luigi Argenziano, Edoardo Casali, Vincenzo Turco, Giuseppe Boriani
{"title":"Acute outcomes and learning curve from the initial patients treated with the PulseSelect system: a real-world multicenter experience of pulsed field ablation.","authors":"Giulio Molon, Stefano Nardi, Gianfranco Mitacchione, Antonio Dello Russo, Danilo Ricciardi, Roberto Mantovan, Luca Bontempi, Alessandro Costa, Luigi Argenziano, Edoardo Casali, Vincenzo Turco, Giuseppe Boriani","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02036-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Catheter ablation is a cornerstone in managing patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF), and while effective, traditional thermal ablation techniques are associated with rare but significant complications due to a non-selective thermal energy transfer to all biologic tissues. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a non-thermal approach, targeting myocardial tissue selectively while sparing adjacent structures. The PulseSelect system is a novel PFA platform, and this analysis examines the procedural outcomes, acute complications, and the learning curve associated with introduction of the PulseSelect system in six European centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The One Shot to Pulmonary Vein Isolation (1STOP) project prospectively included 131 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF treated with the PulseSelect system across six centers. Procedural data, patient characteristics, and acute outcomes were summarized. Additionally, sedation protocols, fluoroscopic times, and acute success rates were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (mean age 61.7 ± 9.7 years; 31.3% female) had predominantly paroxysmal AF (80.9%). Median procedural and fluoroscopy times were 55.0 and 16.0 min, respectively. General anesthesia was used in 75.5% of cases, while in the remaining 24.5% moderate sedation protocols allowed procedures (even in 15.1% without an anesthesiologist). Acute PVI success was 100%, and no major complications were observed. A short learning curve was noted, with significant reductions in procedural times after the initial 2-3 cases at each center.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PulseSelect system showed short procedural times, with a rapid learning curve, thus leading with high procedural efficiency. In 1 out of 4 cases general anesthesia was not applied, and no major complications were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02036-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Catheter ablation is a cornerstone in managing patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF), and while effective, traditional thermal ablation techniques are associated with rare but significant complications due to a non-selective thermal energy transfer to all biologic tissues. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a non-thermal approach, targeting myocardial tissue selectively while sparing adjacent structures. The PulseSelect system is a novel PFA platform, and this analysis examines the procedural outcomes, acute complications, and the learning curve associated with introduction of the PulseSelect system in six European centers.

Methods: The One Shot to Pulmonary Vein Isolation (1STOP) project prospectively included 131 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF treated with the PulseSelect system across six centers. Procedural data, patient characteristics, and acute outcomes were summarized. Additionally, sedation protocols, fluoroscopic times, and acute success rates were reported.

Results: Patients (mean age 61.7 ± 9.7 years; 31.3% female) had predominantly paroxysmal AF (80.9%). Median procedural and fluoroscopy times were 55.0 and 16.0 min, respectively. General anesthesia was used in 75.5% of cases, while in the remaining 24.5% moderate sedation protocols allowed procedures (even in 15.1% without an anesthesiologist). Acute PVI success was 100%, and no major complications were observed. A short learning curve was noted, with significant reductions in procedural times after the initial 2-3 cases at each center.

Conclusion: The PulseSelect system showed short procedural times, with a rapid learning curve, thus leading with high procedural efficiency. In 1 out of 4 cases general anesthesia was not applied, and no major complications were observed.

PulseSelect系统治疗初始患者的急性预后和学习曲线:脉冲场消融的真实多中心体验。
导言:导管消融术是治疗有症状、药物难治性心房颤动(房颤)患者的基石,传统的热消融技术虽然有效,但由于热能不能选择性地传递到所有生物组织,因此很少出现严重的并发症。脉冲场消融(PFA)提供了一种非热方法,可选择性地靶向心肌组织,同时保护邻近结构。PulseSelect 系统是一种新型 PFA 平台,本分析研究了欧洲六家中心引进 PulseSelect 系统后的手术效果、急性并发症和学习曲线:方法:"一针肺静脉隔离"(1STOP)项目前瞻性地纳入了在六个中心接受 PulseSelect 系统治疗的 131 名阵发性或持续性房颤患者。总结了手术数据、患者特征和急性结果。此外,还报告了镇静方案、透视时间和急性期成功率:患者(平均年龄 61.7 ± 9.7 岁;31.3% 为女性)主要为阵发性房颤(80.9%)。手术和透视的中位时间分别为 55.0 分钟和 16.0 分钟。75.5%的病例采用了全身麻醉,其余24.5%的病例采用了适度镇静方案(甚至有15.1%的病例没有麻醉师)。急性 PVI 成功率为 100%,未发现重大并发症。学习曲线很短,每个中心在最初的 2-3 个病例之后,手术时间显著缩短:结论:PulseSelect 系统的手术时间短,学习曲线快,因此手术效率高。在 4 个病例中,有 1 个病例没有进行全身麻醉,也没有发现重大并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信