Patient-Provider Concordance Reduces Missed Appointments in Texas Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Omolola E Adepoju, Patrick Dang
{"title":"Patient-Provider Concordance Reduces Missed Appointments in Texas Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics.","authors":"Omolola E Adepoju, Patrick Dang","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02411-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence suggests that effective provider-patient relationships result in enhanced quality of care and can close health equity gaps, although little is known about the impact of racial and ethnic provider-patient concordant relationships. This study examined how patient-provider concordance impacts the likelihood of missing an appointment in a primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained electronic medical records (EMR) data from a large family medicine Federally Qualified Healthcare Center (FQHC) clinic in Texas between March and November 2020. A mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression model, with patient ID as a random effect, was used to account for the nested data structure of repeated appointments within each patient. We report predicted probabilities and average marginal effects of concordant visits vs. non-concordant visits by race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 76,658 appointments for 31,123 unique patients. Provider-patient concordance occurred in 51% of all appointments. Bivariate analyses revealed that 20% of appointments with patient-provider concordance were missed, compared to 21% in appointments without patient-provider concordance. In the adjusted models, patient-provider concordance was associated with 5% lower odds of missed appointments. Sex, insurance type, and provider experience were also significant factors. Average marginal effects by race/ethnicity showed lower predicted probabilities of missed appointments for concordant visits, compared to non-concordant visits.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The decreased likelihood of missed appointments among patients with similar racial/ethnic backgrounds as their providers supports the notion that representation in healthcare is important, as it can contribute to fewer no-shows, which can lead to improved clinic efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02411-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence suggests that effective provider-patient relationships result in enhanced quality of care and can close health equity gaps, although little is known about the impact of racial and ethnic provider-patient concordant relationships. This study examined how patient-provider concordance impacts the likelihood of missing an appointment in a primary care setting.

Methods: We obtained electronic medical records (EMR) data from a large family medicine Federally Qualified Healthcare Center (FQHC) clinic in Texas between March and November 2020. A mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression model, with patient ID as a random effect, was used to account for the nested data structure of repeated appointments within each patient. We report predicted probabilities and average marginal effects of concordant visits vs. non-concordant visits by race/ethnicity.

Results: The analytic sample included 76,658 appointments for 31,123 unique patients. Provider-patient concordance occurred in 51% of all appointments. Bivariate analyses revealed that 20% of appointments with patient-provider concordance were missed, compared to 21% in appointments without patient-provider concordance. In the adjusted models, patient-provider concordance was associated with 5% lower odds of missed appointments. Sex, insurance type, and provider experience were also significant factors. Average marginal effects by race/ethnicity showed lower predicted probabilities of missed appointments for concordant visits, compared to non-concordant visits.

Interpretation: The decreased likelihood of missed appointments among patients with similar racial/ethnic backgrounds as their providers supports the notion that representation in healthcare is important, as it can contribute to fewer no-shows, which can lead to improved clinic efficiency.

目的:有证据表明,有效的医疗服务提供者与患者之间的关系可提高医疗服务质量,缩小健康公平差距,但人们对种族和民族医疗服务提供者与患者之间的和谐关系的影响知之甚少。本研究探讨了在初级医疗机构中,患者与医疗服务提供者的一致性如何影响错过预约的可能性:我们从德克萨斯州一家大型家庭医疗联邦合格医疗保健中心 (FQHC) 诊所获得了 2020 年 3 月至 11 月期间的电子病历 (EMR) 数据。采用混合效应多变量逻辑回归模型,将患者 ID 作为随机效应,以考虑每位患者重复预约的嵌套数据结构。我们按种族/人种报告了一致就诊与非一致就诊的预测概率和平均边际效应:分析样本包括 31 123 名患者的 76 658 次就诊。在所有预约中,有 51% 的患者与医疗服务提供者达成了一致。双变量分析显示,在患者与提供方一致的预约中,有 20% 的人错过了预约,而在患者与提供方不一致的预约中,有 21% 的人错过了预约。在调整后的模型中,患者和医疗服务提供者意见一致的患者的失约率要低 5%。性别、保险类型和医疗服务提供者的经验也是重要的影响因素。按种族/人种划分的平均边际效应显示,与非一致就诊相比,一致就诊的预测失约概率较低:解释:与医疗服务提供者具有相似种族/民族背景的患者的失约概率降低,这支持了这样一种观点,即医疗服务中的代表性非常重要,因为这有助于减少失约率,从而提高诊所效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信