Antimicrobial susceptibility testing reporting style and education to support clinical decision-making in small animal medicine.

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Dubraska Diaz-Campos, Christy A King, Joany C van Balen, Dimitria Mathys, Emily Janovyak, Thomas Wittum
{"title":"Antimicrobial susceptibility testing reporting style and education to support clinical decision-making in small animal medicine.","authors":"Dubraska Diaz-Campos, Christy A King, Joany C van Balen, Dimitria Mathys, Emily Janovyak, Thomas Wittum","doi":"10.2460/javma.25.01.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The increasing threat of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) organisms highlights the need for effective antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine. This study evaluated how veterinarians treating companion animals utilize antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) reports and antimicrobial use guidelines and their impact on antimicrobial selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to veterinarians across the US, collecting data on demographics, clinical case management, AST report preferences, and perceptions of AMR, diagnostic stewardship, and antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 veterinarians participated. Results indicated a preference (83% to 89%) for AST reports with interpretative comments on antimicrobial selection and dosing. Most respondents (55% to 62%) preferred selective reporting over cascade reporting (25% to 30%). Clinical cases revealed the frequent selection of systemic antimicrobial therapy, with many respondents indicating the need for therapeutic consultation. Two identical cases with different AST report styles (full vs cascade) showed a 26% increase in good antimicrobial stewardship with the cascade report. Gaps in knowledge regarding AST principles were identified, with many respondents misunderstanding the establishment of breakpoints, AST and topical therapy, and the interpretation of MICs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while veterinarians prefer full or selective AST reports, their antimicrobial choices align more closely with guidelines when cascade reports are used. This indicates that the AST report style may influence the antimicrobial stewardship practices of veterinarians and warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study demonstrates the need for improved AST reporting and education on AST interpretation and antimicrobial selection to support antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.01.0045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The increasing threat of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) organisms highlights the need for effective antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine. This study evaluated how veterinarians treating companion animals utilize antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) reports and antimicrobial use guidelines and their impact on antimicrobial selection.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to veterinarians across the US, collecting data on demographics, clinical case management, AST report preferences, and perceptions of AMR, diagnostic stewardship, and antimicrobial stewardship.

Results: A total of 216 veterinarians participated. Results indicated a preference (83% to 89%) for AST reports with interpretative comments on antimicrobial selection and dosing. Most respondents (55% to 62%) preferred selective reporting over cascade reporting (25% to 30%). Clinical cases revealed the frequent selection of systemic antimicrobial therapy, with many respondents indicating the need for therapeutic consultation. Two identical cases with different AST report styles (full vs cascade) showed a 26% increase in good antimicrobial stewardship with the cascade report. Gaps in knowledge regarding AST principles were identified, with many respondents misunderstanding the establishment of breakpoints, AST and topical therapy, and the interpretation of MICs.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while veterinarians prefer full or selective AST reports, their antimicrobial choices align more closely with guidelines when cascade reports are used. This indicates that the AST report style may influence the antimicrobial stewardship practices of veterinarians and warrants further investigation.

Clinical relevance: This study demonstrates the need for improved AST reporting and education on AST interpretation and antimicrobial selection to support antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine.

目的:抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)生物的威胁日益严重,这凸显了兽医领域有效开展抗菌药物管理工作的必要性。本研究评估了治疗伴侣动物的兽医如何利用抗菌药物敏感性检测(AST)报告和抗菌药物使用指南及其对抗菌药物选择的影响:向全美兽医发放了一份在线调查问卷,收集有关人口统计学、临床病例管理、AST 报告偏好以及对 AMR、诊断管理和抗菌药物管理的看法等方面的数据:结果:共有 216 名兽医参与。结果表明(83% 至 89%)受访者更喜欢 AST 报告中关于抗菌药物选择和剂量的解释性意见。大多数受访者(55% 至 62%)倾向于选择性报告,而不是级联报告(25% 至 30%)。临床病例显示,患者经常选择全身性抗菌治疗,许多受访者表示需要进行治疗咨询。两个相同的病例采用了不同的 AST 报告方式(全面报告与逐级报告),结果显示,采用逐级报告方式的抗菌药物管理水平提高了 26%。调查发现,兽医对 AST 原则的认识存在差距,许多受访者对断点的确定、AST 和局部治疗以及 MICs 的解释存在误解:这些研究结果表明,虽然兽医更喜欢全面或选择性的 AST 报告,但在使用级联报告时,他们的抗菌药物选择更符合指南的要求。这表明 AST 报告的风格可能会影响兽医的抗菌药物管理实践,值得进一步研究:这项研究表明,有必要改进 AST 报告,并就 AST 的解释和抗菌药物的选择开展教育,以支持兽医学中的抗菌药物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信