Sparse connectivity enables efficient information processing in cortex-like artificial neural networks.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Neural Circuits Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fncir.2025.1528309
Rieke Fruengel, Marcel Oberlaender
{"title":"Sparse connectivity enables efficient information processing in cortex-like artificial neural networks.","authors":"Rieke Fruengel, Marcel Oberlaender","doi":"10.3389/fncir.2025.1528309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurons in cortical networks are very sparsely connected; even neurons whose axons and dendrites overlap are highly unlikely to form a synaptic connection. What is the relevance of such sparse connectivity for a network's function? Surprisingly, it has been shown that sparse connectivity impairs information processing in artificial neural networks (ANNs). Does this imply that sparse connectivity also impairs information processing in biological neural networks? Although ANNs were originally inspired by the brain, conventional ANNs differ substantially in their structural network architecture from cortical networks. To disentangle the relevance of these structural properties for information processing in networks, we systematically constructed ANNs constrained by interpretable features of cortical networks. We find that in large and recurrently connected networks, as are found in the cortex, sparse connectivity facilitates time- and data-efficient information processing. We explore the origins of these surprising findings and show that conventional dense ANNs distribute information across only a very small fraction of nodes, whereas sparse ANNs distribute information across more nodes. We show that sparsity is most critical in networks with fixed excitatory and inhibitory nodes, mirroring neuronal cell types in cortex. This constraint causes a large learning delay in densely connected networks which is eliminated by sparse connectivity. Taken together, our findings show that sparse connectivity enables efficient information processing given key constraints from cortical networks, setting the stage for further investigation into higher-order features of cortical connectivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12498,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neural Circuits","volume":"19 ","pages":"1528309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neural Circuits","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2025.1528309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neurons in cortical networks are very sparsely connected; even neurons whose axons and dendrites overlap are highly unlikely to form a synaptic connection. What is the relevance of such sparse connectivity for a network's function? Surprisingly, it has been shown that sparse connectivity impairs information processing in artificial neural networks (ANNs). Does this imply that sparse connectivity also impairs information processing in biological neural networks? Although ANNs were originally inspired by the brain, conventional ANNs differ substantially in their structural network architecture from cortical networks. To disentangle the relevance of these structural properties for information processing in networks, we systematically constructed ANNs constrained by interpretable features of cortical networks. We find that in large and recurrently connected networks, as are found in the cortex, sparse connectivity facilitates time- and data-efficient information processing. We explore the origins of these surprising findings and show that conventional dense ANNs distribute information across only a very small fraction of nodes, whereas sparse ANNs distribute information across more nodes. We show that sparsity is most critical in networks with fixed excitatory and inhibitory nodes, mirroring neuronal cell types in cortex. This constraint causes a large learning delay in densely connected networks which is eliminated by sparse connectivity. Taken together, our findings show that sparse connectivity enables efficient information processing given key constraints from cortical networks, setting the stage for further investigation into higher-order features of cortical connectivity.

稀疏连通性使得类皮质人工神经网络的信息处理更加高效。
皮层网络中的神经元连接非常稀疏;即使是轴突和树突重叠的神经元也极不可能形成突触连接。这种稀疏连接与网络功能的相关性是什么?令人惊讶的是,稀疏连通性已被证明会损害人工神经网络(ann)的信息处理。这是否意味着稀疏连接也会损害生物神经网络的信息处理?虽然人工神经网络最初是受大脑的启发,但传统的人工神经网络在结构网络结构上与皮层网络有很大的不同。为了解开这些结构属性与网络中信息处理的相关性,我们系统地构建了受皮层网络可解释特征约束的人工神经网络。我们发现,在大而频繁连接的网络中,就像在皮层中发现的那样,稀疏的连接促进了时间和数据效率的信息处理。我们探索了这些令人惊讶的发现的起源,并表明传统的密集人工神经网络仅在很小一部分节点上分布信息,而稀疏人工神经网络则在更多节点上分布信息。我们发现,在具有固定兴奋性和抑制性节点的网络中,稀疏性是最关键的,反映了皮层中的神经元细胞类型。在密集连接的网络中,这种约束会导致较大的学习延迟,而稀疏连接可以消除这种延迟。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,在皮质网络的关键约束下,稀疏连接能够实现有效的信息处理,为进一步研究皮质连接的高阶特征奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neural Circuits publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on the emergent properties of neural circuits - the elementary modules of the brain. Specialty Chief Editors Takao K. Hensch and Edward Ruthazer at Harvard University and McGill University respectively, are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Neural Circuits launched in 2011 with great success and remains a "central watering hole" for research in neural circuits, serving the community worldwide to share data, ideas and inspiration. Articles revealing the anatomy, physiology, development or function of any neural circuitry in any species (from sponges to humans) are welcome. Our common thread seeks the computational strategies used by different circuits to link their structure with function (perceptual, motor, or internal), the general rules by which they operate, and how their particular designs lead to the emergence of complex properties and behaviors. Submissions focused on synaptic, cellular and connectivity principles in neural microcircuits using multidisciplinary approaches, especially newer molecular, developmental and genetic tools, are encouraged. Studies with an evolutionary perspective to better understand how circuit design and capabilities evolved to produce progressively more complex properties and behaviors are especially welcome. The journal is further interested in research revealing how plasticity shapes the structural and functional architecture of neural circuits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信