Global prevalence of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus spp.: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1524452
Tahereh Navidifar, Abbas Zare Banadkouki, Elnaz Parvizi, Maryam Mofid, Narges Golab, Masoumeh Beig, Mohammad Sholeh
{"title":"Global prevalence of macrolide-resistant <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp.: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tahereh Navidifar, Abbas Zare Banadkouki, Elnaz Parvizi, Maryam Mofid, Narges Golab, Masoumeh Beig, Mohammad Sholeh","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1524452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Staphylococcus</i> is a genus of bacteria responsible for various infections ranging from mild skin to severe systemic diseases. Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are significant challenges owing to their resistance to multiple antibiotics, including macrolides, such as erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize data on the prevalence of macrolide resistance in <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp., identify trends and changes in resistance patterns over time, and assess how testing methods and guidelines affect reported resistance rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study conducted a systematic search of the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Studies have reported the proportion of macrolide-resistant <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. Two authors independently extracted and analyzed the data using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses were performed based on country, continent, species, AST guidelines, methods, and period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 223 studies from 76 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin were 57.3, 52.6, and 57.9%, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I<sup>2</sup> > 95%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Oceania (72%) had the highest erythromycin resistance, whereas Europe had the lowest (40.7%). Subgroup analyses revealed variations in resistance based on the species, with higher resistance in MRSA than in MSSA and CoNS than in other species. Over time, a slight decrease in erythromycin resistance has been observed (59.6% from 2015-2019 to 55% from 2020-2023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes the high prevalence of macrolide resistance in <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. and its notable regional variation. These findings highlight the necessity for standardized methodologies and global surveillance to manage macrolide resistance effectively. Controlling antibiotic resistance should prioritize enhancing public health measures and updating treatment guidelines.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=557756, CRD42024557756.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1524452"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1524452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus is a genus of bacteria responsible for various infections ranging from mild skin to severe systemic diseases. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are significant challenges owing to their resistance to multiple antibiotics, including macrolides, such as erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.

Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize data on the prevalence of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp., identify trends and changes in resistance patterns over time, and assess how testing methods and guidelines affect reported resistance rates.

Methods: The study conducted a systematic search of the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Studies have reported the proportion of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus spp. Two authors independently extracted and analyzed the data using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses were performed based on country, continent, species, AST guidelines, methods, and period.

Results: In total, 223 studies from 76 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin were 57.3, 52.6, and 57.9%, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I2 > 95%, p < 0.001). Oceania (72%) had the highest erythromycin resistance, whereas Europe had the lowest (40.7%). Subgroup analyses revealed variations in resistance based on the species, with higher resistance in MRSA than in MSSA and CoNS than in other species. Over time, a slight decrease in erythromycin resistance has been observed (59.6% from 2015-2019 to 55% from 2020-2023).

Conclusion: This study emphasizes the high prevalence of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp. and its notable regional variation. These findings highlight the necessity for standardized methodologies and global surveillance to manage macrolide resistance effectively. Controlling antibiotic resistance should prioritize enhancing public health measures and updating treatment guidelines.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=557756, CRD42024557756.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信