{"title":"The challenges of iron chelation therapy in thalassemia: how do we overcome them?","authors":"Lauren E Wang, Sara Muttar, Sherif M Badawy","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2489562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions are the primary treatment for thalassemia. However, chronic transfusions ultimately result in iron overload, causing heart, liver, and endocrine complications along with other comorbidities. Although iron chelation is routinely initiated to remove excess iron, adherence remains a challenge, and iron overload still contributes to significant morbidity and early mortality in thalassemia.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We review the evidence for iron overload and its complications in thalassemia. We also assess iron chelation strategies with possible adherence challenges categorized as patient-, medication-, and system-related barriers. Evidence suggests that lower adherence rates have been associated with more endorsed barriers. Further, patient-related barriers could be internal or external, and taking a patient-centered approach is key to addressing these challenges. Choosing the right iron chelator could help overcome some medication-related barriers. Finally, insurance coverage and access to specialized centers could affect initiation of iron chelation.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>A critical and routine assessment of adherence barriers is key to optimizing patients' adherence to iron chelation. Adherence is often a multifactorial process, and it varies over time. Shared decision making with patients and/or caregivers is an important next step to improving adherence to iron chelation, and ultimately health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2489562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions are the primary treatment for thalassemia. However, chronic transfusions ultimately result in iron overload, causing heart, liver, and endocrine complications along with other comorbidities. Although iron chelation is routinely initiated to remove excess iron, adherence remains a challenge, and iron overload still contributes to significant morbidity and early mortality in thalassemia.
Areas covered: We review the evidence for iron overload and its complications in thalassemia. We also assess iron chelation strategies with possible adherence challenges categorized as patient-, medication-, and system-related barriers. Evidence suggests that lower adherence rates have been associated with more endorsed barriers. Further, patient-related barriers could be internal or external, and taking a patient-centered approach is key to addressing these challenges. Choosing the right iron chelator could help overcome some medication-related barriers. Finally, insurance coverage and access to specialized centers could affect initiation of iron chelation.
Expert opinion: A critical and routine assessment of adherence barriers is key to optimizing patients' adherence to iron chelation. Adherence is often a multifactorial process, and it varies over time. Shared decision making with patients and/or caregivers is an important next step to improving adherence to iron chelation, and ultimately health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.