Influence of auditory-based cognitive training on auditory resolution, executive function, and working memory skills in individuals with mild cognitive impairment - a pilot randomized controlled study.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.152775.2
Priya G, Kishan Mm, VaniLakshmi R, Gopee Krishnan
{"title":"Influence of auditory-based cognitive training on auditory resolution, executive function, and working memory skills in individuals with mild cognitive impairment - a pilot randomized controlled study.","authors":"Priya G, Kishan Mm, VaniLakshmi R, Gopee Krishnan","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.152775.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-related central auditory processing disorder and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can be concomitant in older adults, making it difficult to communicate, especially in challenging listening conditions. This preliminary study investigated the efficacy of auditory-based cognitive training on the auditory processing abilities and cognitive functions of older adults with MCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial twenty-two older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were randomly assigned to either an experimental (n=11) or a control group (n=11). The experimental group received 15 cognitive training sessions through tasks involving the auditory domain. The outcome measures of this study included auditory resolution (Temporal gap detection, frequency discrimination, and modulation detection) and cognitive measures (Trail making tests and digit recall), which were administered at three-time points (before training, post-training, and follow-up). The linear mixed model computed the effects of training on the outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant improvement was observed in the modulation detection threshold between baseline and follow-up and between post-training and follow-up sessions. However, GDT and FD thresholds did not reveal any statistically significant difference. In the trail making test, Part B showed consistent significance across the time points, whereas Part A and the delayed recall task showed no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Auditory-based cognitive training may improve auditory processing and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2019/01/017073, registered on 14.01.2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"1022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.152775.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Age-related central auditory processing disorder and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can be concomitant in older adults, making it difficult to communicate, especially in challenging listening conditions. This preliminary study investigated the efficacy of auditory-based cognitive training on the auditory processing abilities and cognitive functions of older adults with MCI.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial twenty-two older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were randomly assigned to either an experimental (n=11) or a control group (n=11). The experimental group received 15 cognitive training sessions through tasks involving the auditory domain. The outcome measures of this study included auditory resolution (Temporal gap detection, frequency discrimination, and modulation detection) and cognitive measures (Trail making tests and digit recall), which were administered at three-time points (before training, post-training, and follow-up). The linear mixed model computed the effects of training on the outcome measures.

Results: A significant improvement was observed in the modulation detection threshold between baseline and follow-up and between post-training and follow-up sessions. However, GDT and FD thresholds did not reveal any statistically significant difference. In the trail making test, Part B showed consistent significance across the time points, whereas Part A and the delayed recall task showed no significant difference.

Conclusion: Auditory-based cognitive training may improve auditory processing and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017073, registered on 14.01.2019.

基于听觉的认知训练对轻度认知障碍患者的听觉分辨率、执行功能和工作记忆能力的影响--一项试验性随机对照研究。
背景:与年龄相关的中枢听觉加工障碍和轻度认知障碍(MCI)可能伴随老年人,使其难以沟通,特别是在具有挑战性的听力条件下。本研究旨在探讨听觉认知训练对老年轻度认知障碍患者听觉加工能力和认知功能的影响。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,22名患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人被随机分为实验组(n=11)和对照组(n=11)。实验组通过涉及听觉领域的任务接受了15次认知训练。本研究的结果测量包括听觉分辨(时间间隙检测、频率辨别和调制检测)和认知测量(轨迹制作测试和数字回忆),这些测量在三个时间点(训练前、训练后和随访)进行。线性混合模型计算了训练对结果测量的影响。结果:基线和随访之间以及训练后和随访之间的调制检测阈值有显著改善。然而,GDT和FD阈值没有统计学上的显著差异。在线索制作测试中,B部分在时间点上具有一致的显著性,而A部分和延迟回忆任务没有显著性差异。结论:听觉认知训练可改善老年人轻度认知障碍(MCI)的听觉加工和执行功能。试验注册:CTRI/2019/01/017073,于2019年1月14日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信