Use of integrated genomic surveillance by local public health authorities: Recommendations based on a mixed-methods study of current adoption, applications and success factors, Germany, 2023.

IF 9.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Anna Bludau, Alexander Jack, Nicole Fischer, Johannes Dreesman, Christian Drosten, Richard Egelkamp, Lutz Ehlkes, Fabian Feil, Adam Grundhoff, Hajo Grundmann, Pascal Kreuzer, Masyar Monazahian, Inga Overesch, Daniel Schmitt, Markus Tröger, Alexandra von Reiswitz, Jonas Weber, Alexander Dilthey, Claudia Hornberg, Sandra Reuter, Simone Scheithauer
{"title":"Use of integrated genomic surveillance by local public health authorities: Recommendations based on a mixed-methods study of current adoption, applications and success factors, Germany, 2023.","authors":"Anna Bludau, Alexander Jack, Nicole Fischer, Johannes Dreesman, Christian Drosten, Richard Egelkamp, Lutz Ehlkes, Fabian Feil, Adam Grundhoff, Hajo Grundmann, Pascal Kreuzer, Masyar Monazahian, Inga Overesch, Daniel Schmitt, Markus Tröger, Alexandra von Reiswitz, Jonas Weber, Alexander Dilthey, Claudia Hornberg, Sandra Reuter, Simone Scheithauer","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.13.2400508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIntegrated genomic surveillance (IGS), i.e. the integrated analysis of pathogen whole genome sequencing and classical epidemiological data, can contribute substantially to the disease surveillance and infection prevention activities of local public health authorities (LPHAs).AimOur aim was to characterise how LPHAs use IGS, and factors required or important for their implementation, in the context of the German public health system.MethodsWe employed a mixed-methods design combining a quantitative survey of 60 LPHAs in three German states with five qualitative case studies based on LPHAs in four German localities and one state-level public health authority.ResultsApproximately half of LPHAs reported adoption of IGS; applications included outbreak analysis (n = 25), targeting and evaluation of infection control measures (n = 25 and n = 18, respectively) and characterisation of pathogen transmission chains (n = 25). Factors identified as required or important for the implementation of IGS in LPHAs included fast sample-to-result turnaround times, organisational data interpretation capabilities and clearly defined surveillance sampling strategies. Based on the case studies in which the adoption of IGS was successful, we formulate recommendations for implementing IGS at the level of LPHAs, including establishment of dedicated IGS analysis teams within LPHAs, use of user-friendly digital solutions (e.g. browser-based dashboards) for data exchange and analysis, and implementation of IGS in collaboration with local academic institutions.ConclusionOur analysis paves the way for increasing the implementation of IGS by LPHAs in Germany and other countries with similarly structured public health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12161,"journal":{"name":"Eurosurveillance","volume":"30 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosurveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.13.2400508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIntegrated genomic surveillance (IGS), i.e. the integrated analysis of pathogen whole genome sequencing and classical epidemiological data, can contribute substantially to the disease surveillance and infection prevention activities of local public health authorities (LPHAs).AimOur aim was to characterise how LPHAs use IGS, and factors required or important for their implementation, in the context of the German public health system.MethodsWe employed a mixed-methods design combining a quantitative survey of 60 LPHAs in three German states with five qualitative case studies based on LPHAs in four German localities and one state-level public health authority.ResultsApproximately half of LPHAs reported adoption of IGS; applications included outbreak analysis (n = 25), targeting and evaluation of infection control measures (n = 25 and n = 18, respectively) and characterisation of pathogen transmission chains (n = 25). Factors identified as required or important for the implementation of IGS in LPHAs included fast sample-to-result turnaround times, organisational data interpretation capabilities and clearly defined surveillance sampling strategies. Based on the case studies in which the adoption of IGS was successful, we formulate recommendations for implementing IGS at the level of LPHAs, including establishment of dedicated IGS analysis teams within LPHAs, use of user-friendly digital solutions (e.g. browser-based dashboards) for data exchange and analysis, and implementation of IGS in collaboration with local academic institutions.ConclusionOur analysis paves the way for increasing the implementation of IGS by LPHAs in Germany and other countries with similarly structured public health systems.

地方公共卫生当局使用综合基因组监测:基于对目前采用、应用和成功因素的混合方法研究的建议,德国,2023年。
综合基因组监测(IGS),即病原体全基因组测序和经典流行病学数据的综合分析,可以为地方公共卫生当局(lpha)的疾病监测和感染预防活动做出重大贡献。我们的目的是在德国公共卫生系统的背景下,描述lpha如何使用IGS,以及实施所需或重要的因素。方法采用混合方法设计,对德国3个州的60个lpha进行定量调查,并对德国4个地区和1个州一级公共卫生当局的lpha进行5个定性案例研究。结果大约一半的lpha报告采用了IGS;应用包括疫情分析(n = 25)、感染控制措施的定位和评价(分别为n = 25和n = 18)以及病原体传播链的表征(n = 25)。在lpha中实施IGS所需或重要的因素包括快速的样本到结果的周转时间、组织数据解释能力和明确定义的监测抽样策略。根据成功采用IGS的案例研究,我们提出了在lpha层面实施IGS的建议,包括在lpha内部建立专门的IGS分析团队,使用用户友好的数字解决方案(例如基于浏览器的仪表板)进行数据交换和分析,以及与本地学术机构合作实施IGS。结论我们的分析为德国和其他具有类似结构公共卫生系统的国家的lpha增加IGS的实施铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurosurveillance
Eurosurveillance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
32.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
430
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed journal focusing on the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention, and control of communicable diseases relevant to Europe.It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays. The journal includes short rapid communications, in-depth research articles, surveillance reports, reviews, and perspective papers. It excels in timely publication of authoritative papers on ongoing outbreaks or other public health events. Under special circumstances when current events need to be urgently communicated to readers for rapid public health action, e-alerts can be released outside of the regular publishing schedule. Additionally, topical compilations and special issues may be provided in PDF format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信