Surgical Management of Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament Injuries: Indications, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nathan H Varady, Julia Retzky, Rajiv P Reddy, Harry G Greditzer, Adam J Tagliero, Joshua S Dines
{"title":"Surgical Management of Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament Injuries: Indications, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes.","authors":"Nathan H Varady, Julia Retzky, Rajiv P Reddy, Harry G Greditzer, Adam J Tagliero, Joshua S Dines","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09963-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions, emphasizing clinical presentation, operative indications, and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>HAGL lesions play an important role in shoulder instability, occurring in 7.5%-9.4% of surgically treated cases, with a high propensity to cause recurrent instability if left untreated. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting HAGL lesions remains imperfect (50%- 83%), making arthroscopy the diagnostic gold-standard. Primary instability is the most common surgical indication (up to 82% of cases). Surgical repair, whether open or arthroscopic, yields excellent outcomes, with return to sport (RTS) rates of 81%- 100% and recurrent instability rates as low as 0%- 5.6%. Athletes may not always RTS at the same level (44%- 80%), however, and recurrent instability rates are higher in collision athletes (up to 21%). Limited data suggest a high incidence of recurrent instability in nonoperatively managed cases (up to 90%), although data on ideal indications for nonoperative management are lacking. HAGL lesions are an important yet often under-recognized cause of shoulder instability. Surgery is indicated in most cases due to its positive results, though comparative data between arthroscopic and open approaches are limited. Future research should refine imaging accuracy, directly compare arthroscopic versus open approaches, and enhance rehabilitation to improve pre-injury RTS rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-025-09963-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions, emphasizing clinical presentation, operative indications, and surgical outcomes.

Recent findings: HAGL lesions play an important role in shoulder instability, occurring in 7.5%-9.4% of surgically treated cases, with a high propensity to cause recurrent instability if left untreated. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting HAGL lesions remains imperfect (50%- 83%), making arthroscopy the diagnostic gold-standard. Primary instability is the most common surgical indication (up to 82% of cases). Surgical repair, whether open or arthroscopic, yields excellent outcomes, with return to sport (RTS) rates of 81%- 100% and recurrent instability rates as low as 0%- 5.6%. Athletes may not always RTS at the same level (44%- 80%), however, and recurrent instability rates are higher in collision athletes (up to 21%). Limited data suggest a high incidence of recurrent instability in nonoperatively managed cases (up to 90%), although data on ideal indications for nonoperative management are lacking. HAGL lesions are an important yet often under-recognized cause of shoulder instability. Surgery is indicated in most cases due to its positive results, though comparative data between arthroscopic and open approaches are limited. Future research should refine imaging accuracy, directly compare arthroscopic versus open approaches, and enhance rehabilitation to improve pre-injury RTS rates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信