Surgical Management of Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament Injuries: Indications, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nathan H Varady, Julia Retzky, Rajiv P Reddy, Harry G Greditzer, Adam J Tagliero, Joshua S Dines
{"title":"Surgical Management of Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament Injuries: Indications, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes.","authors":"Nathan H Varady, Julia Retzky, Rajiv P Reddy, Harry G Greditzer, Adam J Tagliero, Joshua S Dines","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09963-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions, emphasizing clinical presentation, operative indications, and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>HAGL lesions play an important role in shoulder instability, occurring in 7.5%-9.4% of surgically treated cases, with a high propensity to cause recurrent instability if left untreated. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting HAGL lesions remains imperfect (50%- 83%), making arthroscopy the diagnostic gold-standard. Primary instability is the most common surgical indication (up to 82% of cases). Surgical repair, whether open or arthroscopic, yields excellent outcomes, with return to sport (RTS) rates of 81%- 100% and recurrent instability rates as low as 0%- 5.6%. Athletes may not always RTS at the same level (44%- 80%), however, and recurrent instability rates are higher in collision athletes (up to 21%). Limited data suggest a high incidence of recurrent instability in nonoperatively managed cases (up to 90%), although data on ideal indications for nonoperative management are lacking. HAGL lesions are an important yet often under-recognized cause of shoulder instability. Surgery is indicated in most cases due to its positive results, though comparative data between arthroscopic and open approaches are limited. Future research should refine imaging accuracy, directly compare arthroscopic versus open approaches, and enhance rehabilitation to improve pre-injury RTS rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-025-09963-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions, emphasizing clinical presentation, operative indications, and surgical outcomes.

Recent findings: HAGL lesions play an important role in shoulder instability, occurring in 7.5%-9.4% of surgically treated cases, with a high propensity to cause recurrent instability if left untreated. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting HAGL lesions remains imperfect (50%- 83%), making arthroscopy the diagnostic gold-standard. Primary instability is the most common surgical indication (up to 82% of cases). Surgical repair, whether open or arthroscopic, yields excellent outcomes, with return to sport (RTS) rates of 81%- 100% and recurrent instability rates as low as 0%- 5.6%. Athletes may not always RTS at the same level (44%- 80%), however, and recurrent instability rates are higher in collision athletes (up to 21%). Limited data suggest a high incidence of recurrent instability in nonoperatively managed cases (up to 90%), although data on ideal indications for nonoperative management are lacking. HAGL lesions are an important yet often under-recognized cause of shoulder instability. Surgery is indicated in most cases due to its positive results, though comparative data between arthroscopic and open approaches are limited. Future research should refine imaging accuracy, directly compare arthroscopic versus open approaches, and enhance rehabilitation to improve pre-injury RTS rates.

肱骨关节韧带撕脱伤的外科治疗:指征、治疗策略和结果。
综述目的:本综述旨在综合目前关于肱骨盂肱韧带撕脱伤(HAGL)病变的知识,强调临床表现、手术指征和手术结果。最近的研究发现:HAGL病变在肩关节不稳定中起重要作用,发生在7.5%-9.4%的手术治疗病例中,如果不及时治疗,极易引起复发性不稳定。磁共振成像检测HAGL病变的灵敏度仍然不完美(50%- 83%),使关节镜成为诊断的金标准。原发性不稳定是最常见的手术指征(高达82%的病例)。手术修复,无论是开放的还是关节镜下的,结果都很好,恢复运动(RTS)率为81%- 100%,复发不稳定率低至0%- 5.6%。然而,运动员可能并不总是处于同一水平的RTS(44%- 80%),碰撞运动员的反复不稳定率更高(高达21%)。有限的数据表明,在非手术治疗的病例中,复发性不稳定的发生率很高(高达90%),尽管缺乏关于非手术治疗的理想适应症的数据。HAGL病变是肩关节不稳定的重要原因,但往往未被充分认识。手术是指在大多数情况下,由于其积极的结果,虽然比较数据之间的关节镜和开放途径是有限的。未来的研究应提高成像精度,直接比较关节镜入路与开放入路,并加强康复以提高损伤前RTS率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信