Historical Redlining and All-Cause Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Furrina F Lee, Tabassum Z Insaf, Helen C S Meier, Lili Tian, Henry Louis Taylor, Deborah O Erwin, Heather M Ochs-Balcom
{"title":"Historical Redlining and All-Cause Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis.","authors":"Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Furrina F Lee, Tabassum Z Insaf, Helen C S Meier, Lili Tian, Henry Louis Taylor, Deborah O Erwin, Heather M Ochs-Balcom","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historical redlining was a 1930s residential segregation policy, in which neighborhoods were graded according to race, class, and land use. As contemporary neighborhood profiles differ according to historical redlining grade, historical redlining may contribute to current breast cancer disparities. We evaluated whether historical redlining grade is associated with overall 5-year survival in a cohort of breast cancer cases in New York State. We hypothesize that worse redlining grade is associated with lower survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This New York State Cancer Registry-based cohort included 60,773 breast cancer cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 and in a census tract at diagnosis with a historical redlining grade. Cases were assigned a grade: A (best) to D (hazardous). Cox models estimated HRs for 5-year mortality associated with historical redlining grade. We stratified models by case factors and neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year survival displayed a significant gradient with historical redlining (P < 0.001). Compared with A-grade, residence in B-grade, C-grade, and D-grade neighborhoods was associated with a 29%, 37%, and 64% increase in mortality, respectively (P < 0.001). Associations persisted after adjustment for health insurance and treatments. Elevated risk associated with D-grade was specifically observed among non-Hispanic White cases, local and regional stages, hormone receptor-positive tumors, non-triple-negative cases, and across neighborhood characteristics. We found significant interaction with redlining grade for race/ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Historical redlining was associated with progressively lower survival for each grade among breast cancer cases. Associations are not fully explained by healthcare factors or contemporary neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Historical redlining has lasting effects on contemporary breast cancer survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"904-913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historical redlining was a 1930s residential segregation policy, in which neighborhoods were graded according to race, class, and land use. As contemporary neighborhood profiles differ according to historical redlining grade, historical redlining may contribute to current breast cancer disparities. We evaluated whether historical redlining grade is associated with overall 5-year survival in a cohort of breast cancer cases in New York State. We hypothesize that worse redlining grade is associated with lower survival.

Methods: This New York State Cancer Registry-based cohort included 60,773 breast cancer cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 and in a census tract at diagnosis with a historical redlining grade. Cases were assigned a grade: A (best) to D (hazardous). Cox models estimated HRs for 5-year mortality associated with historical redlining grade. We stratified models by case factors and neighborhood characteristics.

Results: Five-year survival displayed a significant gradient with historical redlining (P < 0.001). Compared with A-grade, residence in B-grade, C-grade, and D-grade neighborhoods was associated with a 29%, 37%, and 64% increase in mortality, respectively (P < 0.001). Associations persisted after adjustment for health insurance and treatments. Elevated risk associated with D-grade was specifically observed among non-Hispanic White cases, local and regional stages, hormone receptor-positive tumors, non-triple-negative cases, and across neighborhood characteristics. We found significant interaction with redlining grade for race/ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics.

Conclusions: Historical redlining was associated with progressively lower survival for each grade among breast cancer cases. Associations are not fully explained by healthcare factors or contemporary neighborhood characteristics.

Impact: Historical redlining has lasting effects on contemporary breast cancer survival.

乳腺癌诊断后的历史红线和全因生存率。
背景:历史上的红线是20世纪30年代的住宅隔离政策,根据种族、阶级和土地使用情况对社区进行分级。由于当代社区概况根据历史红线等级不同,历史红线可能导致当前乳腺癌的差异。我们在纽约州(NYS)的一组乳腺癌病例中评估了历史红线分级是否与总5年生存率相关。我们假设较差的红线分级与较低的生存率相关。方法:该基于纽约州癌症登记处的队列包括2008-2018年诊断的60,773例乳腺癌病例,并在人口普查区诊断为历史红线级别。案例被划分了等级:a(最佳)到D(危险)。Cox模型估计了与历史红线分级相关的5年死亡率的风险比(HR)。我们根据案例因素和邻里特征对模型进行分层。结果:5年生存率随着历史上的红线显示出显著的梯度(结论:历史上的红线与乳腺癌病例中每个级别的生存率逐渐降低有关。这些关联不能完全用保健因素或当代社区特征来解释。影响:历史红线对当代乳腺癌患者的生存有持久的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信