Historical redlining and all-cause survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Furrina F Lee, Tabassum Z Insaf, Helen C S Meier, Lili Tian, Henry Louis Taylor, Deborah O Erwin, Heather M Ochs-Balcom
{"title":"Historical redlining and all-cause survival after breast cancer diagnosis.","authors":"Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Furrina F Lee, Tabassum Z Insaf, Helen C S Meier, Lili Tian, Henry Louis Taylor, Deborah O Erwin, Heather M Ochs-Balcom","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historical redlining was a 1930s residential segregation policy, where neighborhoods were graded according to race, class, and land-use. As contemporary neighborhood profiles differ according to historical redlining grade, historical redlining may contribute to current breast cancer disparities. We evaluated whether historical redlining grade is associated with overall 5-year survival in a cohort of breast cancer cases in New York State (NYS). We hypothesize worse redlining grade is associated with lower survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This NYS Cancer Registry-based cohort included 60,773 breast cancer cases diagnosed 2008-2018 and in a census tract at diagnosis with a historical redlining grade. Cases were assigned a grade: A (\"best\") to D (\"hazardous\"). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for 5-year mortality associated with historical redlining grade. We stratified models by case factors and neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year survival displayed a significant gradient with historical redlining (P<0.001). Compared to A-grade, residence in B-grade, C-grade, and D-grade neighborhood was associated with a 29%, 37%, and 64% increase in mortality, respectively (P<0.001). Associations persisted after adjustment for health insurance and treatments. Elevated risk associated with D-grade was specifically observed among non-Hispanic White cases, local and regional stage, hormone receptor-positive tumors, non-triple negative cases, and across neighborhood characteristics. We found significant interaction with redlining grade for race/ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Historical redlining was associated with progressively lower survival for each grade among breast cancer cases. Associations are not fully explained by healthcare factors or contemporary neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Historical redlining has lasting effects on contemporary breast cancer survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historical redlining was a 1930s residential segregation policy, where neighborhoods were graded according to race, class, and land-use. As contemporary neighborhood profiles differ according to historical redlining grade, historical redlining may contribute to current breast cancer disparities. We evaluated whether historical redlining grade is associated with overall 5-year survival in a cohort of breast cancer cases in New York State (NYS). We hypothesize worse redlining grade is associated with lower survival.

Methods: This NYS Cancer Registry-based cohort included 60,773 breast cancer cases diagnosed 2008-2018 and in a census tract at diagnosis with a historical redlining grade. Cases were assigned a grade: A ("best") to D ("hazardous"). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for 5-year mortality associated with historical redlining grade. We stratified models by case factors and neighborhood characteristics.

Results: Five-year survival displayed a significant gradient with historical redlining (P<0.001). Compared to A-grade, residence in B-grade, C-grade, and D-grade neighborhood was associated with a 29%, 37%, and 64% increase in mortality, respectively (P<0.001). Associations persisted after adjustment for health insurance and treatments. Elevated risk associated with D-grade was specifically observed among non-Hispanic White cases, local and regional stage, hormone receptor-positive tumors, non-triple negative cases, and across neighborhood characteristics. We found significant interaction with redlining grade for race/ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics.

Conclusions: Historical redlining was associated with progressively lower survival for each grade among breast cancer cases. Associations are not fully explained by healthcare factors or contemporary neighborhood characteristics.

Impact: Historical redlining has lasting effects on contemporary breast cancer survival.

乳腺癌诊断后的历史红线和全因生存率。
背景:历史上的红线是20世纪30年代的住宅隔离政策,根据种族、阶级和土地使用情况对社区进行分级。由于当代社区概况根据历史红线等级不同,历史红线可能导致当前乳腺癌的差异。我们在纽约州(NYS)的一组乳腺癌病例中评估了历史红线分级是否与总5年生存率相关。我们假设较差的红线分级与较低的生存率相关。方法:该基于纽约州癌症登记处的队列包括2008-2018年诊断的60,773例乳腺癌病例,并在人口普查区诊断为历史红线级别。案例被划分了等级:a(最佳)到D(危险)。Cox模型估计了与历史红线分级相关的5年死亡率的风险比(HR)。我们根据案例因素和邻里特征对模型进行分层。结果:5年生存率随着历史上的红线显示出显著的梯度(结论:历史上的红线与乳腺癌病例中每个级别的生存率逐渐降低有关。这些关联不能完全用保健因素或当代社区特征来解释。影响:历史红线对当代乳腺癌患者的生存有持久的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信