Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Furrina F Lee, Tabassum Z Insaf, Helen C S Meier, Lili Tian, Henry Louis Taylor, Deborah O Erwin, Heather M Ochs-Balcom
{"title":"Historical redlining and all-cause survival after breast cancer diagnosis.","authors":"Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Furrina F Lee, Tabassum Z Insaf, Helen C S Meier, Lili Tian, Henry Louis Taylor, Deborah O Erwin, Heather M Ochs-Balcom","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historical redlining was a 1930s residential segregation policy, where neighborhoods were graded according to race, class, and land-use. As contemporary neighborhood profiles differ according to historical redlining grade, historical redlining may contribute to current breast cancer disparities. We evaluated whether historical redlining grade is associated with overall 5-year survival in a cohort of breast cancer cases in New York State (NYS). We hypothesize worse redlining grade is associated with lower survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This NYS Cancer Registry-based cohort included 60,773 breast cancer cases diagnosed 2008-2018 and in a census tract at diagnosis with a historical redlining grade. Cases were assigned a grade: A (\"best\") to D (\"hazardous\"). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for 5-year mortality associated with historical redlining grade. We stratified models by case factors and neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year survival displayed a significant gradient with historical redlining (P<0.001). Compared to A-grade, residence in B-grade, C-grade, and D-grade neighborhood was associated with a 29%, 37%, and 64% increase in mortality, respectively (P<0.001). Associations persisted after adjustment for health insurance and treatments. Elevated risk associated with D-grade was specifically observed among non-Hispanic White cases, local and regional stage, hormone receptor-positive tumors, non-triple negative cases, and across neighborhood characteristics. We found significant interaction with redlining grade for race/ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Historical redlining was associated with progressively lower survival for each grade among breast cancer cases. Associations are not fully explained by healthcare factors or contemporary neighborhood characteristics.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Historical redlining has lasting effects on contemporary breast cancer survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Historical redlining was a 1930s residential segregation policy, where neighborhoods were graded according to race, class, and land-use. As contemporary neighborhood profiles differ according to historical redlining grade, historical redlining may contribute to current breast cancer disparities. We evaluated whether historical redlining grade is associated with overall 5-year survival in a cohort of breast cancer cases in New York State (NYS). We hypothesize worse redlining grade is associated with lower survival.
Methods: This NYS Cancer Registry-based cohort included 60,773 breast cancer cases diagnosed 2008-2018 and in a census tract at diagnosis with a historical redlining grade. Cases were assigned a grade: A ("best") to D ("hazardous"). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for 5-year mortality associated with historical redlining grade. We stratified models by case factors and neighborhood characteristics.
Results: Five-year survival displayed a significant gradient with historical redlining (P<0.001). Compared to A-grade, residence in B-grade, C-grade, and D-grade neighborhood was associated with a 29%, 37%, and 64% increase in mortality, respectively (P<0.001). Associations persisted after adjustment for health insurance and treatments. Elevated risk associated with D-grade was specifically observed among non-Hispanic White cases, local and regional stage, hormone receptor-positive tumors, non-triple negative cases, and across neighborhood characteristics. We found significant interaction with redlining grade for race/ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics.
Conclusions: Historical redlining was associated with progressively lower survival for each grade among breast cancer cases. Associations are not fully explained by healthcare factors or contemporary neighborhood characteristics.
Impact: Historical redlining has lasting effects on contemporary breast cancer survival.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.