{"title":"Understanding Eyebrow and Eyelash Involvement in Patients with Alopecia Areata and Responsiveness to Treatment with Baricitinib.","authors":"Arash Mostaghimi, Brittany Craiglow, Brett King, Jerry Shapiro, Justin Ko, Antonella Tosti, Manabu Ohyama, Yiying Brogan, Guanglei Yu, Angelina Sontag, Najwa Somani","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eyebrow and eyelash (EB/EL) involvement is an important consideration in the assessment of alopecia areata (AA) severity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We report integrated results from BRAVE-AA1 (NCT03570749) and BRAVE-AA2 (NCT03899259) characterising EB/EL involvement at baseline in patients with AA and response to baricitinib treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2 were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted at 169 centres in 10 countries. Patients were randomised to placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, or baricitinib 4 mg. Pooled data from patients continually treated with baricitinib through Week 52 were included. Outcomes were assessed using the Clinician-Reported Outcome (ClinRO) measure for EB/EL and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score for scalp.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, patients with more severe EB/EL involvement had more severe scalp hair loss, with mean SALT scores ranging from 70.6 to 96.0 for patients with no gaps to complete absence of hair, respectively, at EB/EL sites. EB/EL response rates [ClinRO (0,1) with ≥1-point improvement] at Week 36 were significantly higher in patients treated with both baricitinib 2 mg (28.2%, odds ratio [OR]=3.27, 25.1% OR=2.95) and baricitinib 4 mg (44.3% OR=6.84, 46.4% OR=8.21) as compared with placebo (12.6%, 12.4%). There was high concordance between EB response and EL response, with approximately 80% of patients who achieved hair regrowth at one site, achieving regrowth at the other with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp responders (SALT score <20 at Week 52), 78.5% and 82.6% achieved an EB and EL response, respectively, and 71.1% of patients achieved a response in both EB and EL with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp nonresponders (SALT score >20 at Week 52), 46.7% and 48.7% achieved EB and EL responses, respectively, and 35.4% achieved responses in both EB and EL. Similar trends but lower response rates were observed with baricitinib 2 mg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline severity of EB/EL involvement parallels that of the scalp. Baricitinib was efficacious in achieving holistic response across all three hair-bearing sites in a majority of Week 52 scalp responders. These data detail the benefits of baricitinib across important hair-bearing sites involved in AA and highlight that individual patient treatment success should account for the totality of the clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>BRAVE-AA1, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03570749, start date, September 24, 2018; BRAVE-AA2, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03899259, start date, July 8, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Eyebrow and eyelash (EB/EL) involvement is an important consideration in the assessment of alopecia areata (AA) severity.
Objectives: We report integrated results from BRAVE-AA1 (NCT03570749) and BRAVE-AA2 (NCT03899259) characterising EB/EL involvement at baseline in patients with AA and response to baricitinib treatment.
Methods: BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2 were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted at 169 centres in 10 countries. Patients were randomised to placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, or baricitinib 4 mg. Pooled data from patients continually treated with baricitinib through Week 52 were included. Outcomes were assessed using the Clinician-Reported Outcome (ClinRO) measure for EB/EL and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score for scalp.
Results: At baseline, patients with more severe EB/EL involvement had more severe scalp hair loss, with mean SALT scores ranging from 70.6 to 96.0 for patients with no gaps to complete absence of hair, respectively, at EB/EL sites. EB/EL response rates [ClinRO (0,1) with ≥1-point improvement] at Week 36 were significantly higher in patients treated with both baricitinib 2 mg (28.2%, odds ratio [OR]=3.27, 25.1% OR=2.95) and baricitinib 4 mg (44.3% OR=6.84, 46.4% OR=8.21) as compared with placebo (12.6%, 12.4%). There was high concordance between EB response and EL response, with approximately 80% of patients who achieved hair regrowth at one site, achieving regrowth at the other with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp responders (SALT score <20 at Week 52), 78.5% and 82.6% achieved an EB and EL response, respectively, and 71.1% of patients achieved a response in both EB and EL with baricitinib 4 mg. Among scalp nonresponders (SALT score >20 at Week 52), 46.7% and 48.7% achieved EB and EL responses, respectively, and 35.4% achieved responses in both EB and EL. Similar trends but lower response rates were observed with baricitinib 2 mg.
Conclusions: Baseline severity of EB/EL involvement parallels that of the scalp. Baricitinib was efficacious in achieving holistic response across all three hair-bearing sites in a majority of Week 52 scalp responders. These data detail the benefits of baricitinib across important hair-bearing sites involved in AA and highlight that individual patient treatment success should account for the totality of the clinical presentation.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.