Measurement Properties of the Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Measure for Acne (CompAQ): A Cohort Study at Three International Sites.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Michael R Nock, Delaney Griffiths, Ali Shields, Karen Michael, Nuha Nasir, Jaefer Mohamad, James Choe, Delwyn Z J Lim, Alison M Layton, Jerry Tan, Hazel H Oon, John S Barbieri
{"title":"Measurement Properties of the Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Measure for Acne (CompAQ): A Cohort Study at Three International Sites.","authors":"Michael R Nock, Delaney Griffiths, Ali Shields, Karen Michael, Nuha Nasir, Jaefer Mohamad, James Choe, Delwyn Z J Lim, Alison M Layton, Jerry Tan, Hazel H Oon, John S Barbieri","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljaf127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Measure for Acne (CompAQ) is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with acne. The measure is one of two acne-specific PROMs which had the strongest evidence to support its use in a recent COSMIN systematic review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To build on prior validation studies of CompAQ by confirming several of its known measurement properties in a cohort of patients with acne at three international sites; and, to establish the responsiveness of the measure during acne treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults being seen for routine acne treatment at dermatology clinics in Canada, the United States, and Singapore were recruited between July 2022 and September 2024 to participate in this cohort study. At each visit, participants completed CompAQ, which consists of twenty items representing five domains (i.e., emotions, social judgement, social interaction, treatment, and symptoms domains), and several other relevant measures. Structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency by calculating Cronbach alpha values, and construct validity by known groups and convergent validity hypothesis testing. We further evaluated for differential item functioning (DIF) across study site, sex, and age. In addition, we assessed responsiveness by change-score validity hypothesis testing and calculating standardized response means (SRM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 315 participants (mean [SD] age, 25.2 years [6.1 years]; 219 females [69.8%]), and data was collected from a total of 588 visits. CompAQ was found to have sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity among patients at each study site and in the combined cohort. In addition, no statistically significant uniform or non-uniform DIF was flagged for most items when analyzing DIF by site, sex, and age. Based on SRM estimates, the emotions (SRM = 0.927) and symptoms (0.914) domains had the largest responsiveness while the social judgement (0.606), social interaction (0.522), and treatment (0.787) domains had more moderate responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CompAQ represents a useful and responsive PROM to evaluate HRQoL among those with acne in clinical trials and clinical practice. Future studies are needed to evaluate the interpretability of the measure (i.e., identifying severity strata and minimally important differences).</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Measure for Acne (CompAQ) is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with acne. The measure is one of two acne-specific PROMs which had the strongest evidence to support its use in a recent COSMIN systematic review.

Objective: To build on prior validation studies of CompAQ by confirming several of its known measurement properties in a cohort of patients with acne at three international sites; and, to establish the responsiveness of the measure during acne treatment.

Methods: Adults being seen for routine acne treatment at dermatology clinics in Canada, the United States, and Singapore were recruited between July 2022 and September 2024 to participate in this cohort study. At each visit, participants completed CompAQ, which consists of twenty items representing five domains (i.e., emotions, social judgement, social interaction, treatment, and symptoms domains), and several other relevant measures. Structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency by calculating Cronbach alpha values, and construct validity by known groups and convergent validity hypothesis testing. We further evaluated for differential item functioning (DIF) across study site, sex, and age. In addition, we assessed responsiveness by change-score validity hypothesis testing and calculating standardized response means (SRM).

Results: Our study included 315 participants (mean [SD] age, 25.2 years [6.1 years]; 219 females [69.8%]), and data was collected from a total of 588 visits. CompAQ was found to have sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity among patients at each study site and in the combined cohort. In addition, no statistically significant uniform or non-uniform DIF was flagged for most items when analyzing DIF by site, sex, and age. Based on SRM estimates, the emotions (SRM = 0.927) and symptoms (0.914) domains had the largest responsiveness while the social judgement (0.606), social interaction (0.522), and treatment (0.787) domains had more moderate responsiveness.

Conclusions: CompAQ represents a useful and responsive PROM to evaluate HRQoL among those with acne in clinical trials and clinical practice. Future studies are needed to evaluate the interpretability of the measure (i.e., identifying severity strata and minimally important differences).

痤疮综合生活质量测量(CompAQ)的测量特性:在三个国际站点的队列研究。
背景:痤疮综合生活质量测量(CompAQ)是一种评估痤疮患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的患者报告结果测量(PROM)。在最近的COSMIN系统评价中,该措施是两种痤疮特异性prom之一,有最有力的证据支持其使用。目的:通过在三个国家的痤疮患者队列中确认康柏公司的几个已知测量特性,以建立康柏公司先前的验证研究;并且,在痤疮治疗期间建立措施的响应性。方法:在2022年7月至2024年9月期间,在加拿大、美国和新加坡的皮肤科诊所接受常规痤疮治疗的成年人被招募参加这项队列研究。在每次访问中,参与者完成康柏问卷,其中包括代表五个领域(即情绪、社会判断、社会互动、治疗和症状领域)的二十个项目,以及其他一些相关测量。结构效度通过验证性因子分析评估,内部一致性通过计算Cronbach alpha值评估,结构效度通过已知群体和收敛效度假设检验评估。我们进一步评估了不同研究地点、性别和年龄的差异项目功能(DIF)。此外,我们通过改变得分效度假设检验和计算标准化反应均值(SRM)来评估反应性。结果:我们的研究纳入了315名参与者(平均[SD]年龄,25.2岁[6.1岁];219名女性[69.8%]),共588次就诊。康柏在每个研究地点和联合队列的患者中具有足够的结构效度、内部一致性和结构效度。此外,在按地点、性别和年龄分析DIF时,大多数项目没有统计学意义上的均匀或非均匀DIF。根据SRM估计,情绪(SRM = 0.927)和症状(0.914)领域的反应性最大,而社会判断(0.606)、社会互动(0.522)和治疗(0.787)领域的反应性较中等。结论:在临床试验和临床实践中,CompAQ为痤疮患者HRQoL的评价提供了一种有效的、反应灵敏的PROM。未来的研究需要评估测量的可解释性(即,确定严重程度和最小重要差异)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信