Randomized Trial on Electroacupuncture for Recovery of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Function Based on Long-Term Monitoring Device.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yuling Cai, Haoyang Li, Haiou Nan, Pengyan Xu, Jiayu Li, Huafeng Pan, Haifeng Wang, Miaomiao Ge, Junjie Guan, Zhiwei Jiang, Gang Wang
{"title":"Randomized Trial on Electroacupuncture for Recovery of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Function Based on Long-Term Monitoring Device.","authors":"Yuling Cai, Haoyang Li, Haiou Nan, Pengyan Xu, Jiayu Li, Huafeng Pan, Haifeng Wang, Miaomiao Ge, Junjie Guan, Zhiwei Jiang, Gang Wang","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17239-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in promoting the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function and to discuss the potential mechanism on the basis of heart rate variability (HRV).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled study. Postoperative patients with gastric cancer received either electroacupuncture (EA) or sham electroacupuncture (SEA) 2 h after surgery and on the morning of the first 2 days after surgery, with each session lasting 30 min. The acupoints, treatment timepoints, and treatment durations in the SEA group were kept consistent with those in the EA group, but the intervention was SEA. Both groups were equipped with artificial intelligence HRV monitoring devices to monitor perioperative HRV and continuous bowel sound auscultation recorders to monitor perioperative bowel sound recovery in real time. Gastrointestinal function recovery indicators, HRV indicators, inflammatory markers, the incidence of postoperative complications, and adverse events were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in baseline. First flatus time, first oral feeding time, intestinal function recovery time, and length of postoperative hospitalization of EA group were better than those of the SEA group, (P < 0.05). On day 3 after surgery, in EA group, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) were lower than those in SEA group (P < 0.05). HRV indicators such as standard deviation of the average NN intervals, percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms (PNN50), and high frequency were higher in EA group than those in SEA group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EA can safely and effectively promote gastrointestinal function rehabilitation in postoperative patients with gastric cancer, whose mechanism may be associated with higher tension in the vagus nerve, affected by EA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17239-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This research aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in promoting the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function and to discuss the potential mechanism on the basis of heart rate variability (HRV).

Patients and methods: This was a randomized controlled study. Postoperative patients with gastric cancer received either electroacupuncture (EA) or sham electroacupuncture (SEA) 2 h after surgery and on the morning of the first 2 days after surgery, with each session lasting 30 min. The acupoints, treatment timepoints, and treatment durations in the SEA group were kept consistent with those in the EA group, but the intervention was SEA. Both groups were equipped with artificial intelligence HRV monitoring devices to monitor perioperative HRV and continuous bowel sound auscultation recorders to monitor perioperative bowel sound recovery in real time. Gastrointestinal function recovery indicators, HRV indicators, inflammatory markers, the incidence of postoperative complications, and adverse events were analyzed.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in baseline. First flatus time, first oral feeding time, intestinal function recovery time, and length of postoperative hospitalization of EA group were better than those of the SEA group, (P < 0.05). On day 3 after surgery, in EA group, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) were lower than those in SEA group (P < 0.05). HRV indicators such as standard deviation of the average NN intervals, percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms (PNN50), and high frequency were higher in EA group than those in SEA group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: EA can safely and effectively promote gastrointestinal function rehabilitation in postoperative patients with gastric cancer, whose mechanism may be associated with higher tension in the vagus nerve, affected by EA.

基于长期监测装置的电针术后胃肠功能恢复的随机试验。
研究背景本研究旨在探讨电针促进术后胃肠功能恢复的有效性和安全性,并根据心率变异性(HRV)探讨其潜在机制:这是一项随机对照研究。患者:这是一项随机对照研究。胃癌术后患者分别在术后 2 小时和术后第 2 天上午接受电针或假电针治疗,每次治疗持续 30 分钟。SEA组的穴位、治疗时间点和治疗持续时间与EA组保持一致,但干预方式为SEA。两组均配备了人工智能心率变异监测设备,用于监测围手术期心率变异;配备了连续肠鸣音听诊记录仪,用于实时监测围手术期肠鸣音恢复情况。对胃肠功能恢复指标、心率变异指标、炎症指标、术后并发症发生率和不良事件进行分析:基线差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。EA组的首次排便时间、首次口服进食时间、肠道功能恢复时间和术后住院时间均优于SEA组(P<0.05)。术后第 3 天,EA 组的 C 反应蛋白、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)均低于 SEA 组(P<0.05)。EA组的平均NN间期标准差、相差50毫秒以上的连续RR间期百分比(PNN50)和高频率等心率变异指标均高于SEA组(P<0.05):EA能安全有效地促进胃癌术后患者的胃肠功能康复,其机制可能与受EA影响的迷走神经张力较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信