Intranasal alfaxalone in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) does not produce sedation compared to intramuscular alfaxalone with or without midazolam.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Susan M Jones, Olivia A Petritz, Katherine R Cassady, Kim Love, Julie A Balko
{"title":"Intranasal alfaxalone in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) does not produce sedation compared to intramuscular alfaxalone with or without midazolam.","authors":"Susan M Jones, Olivia A Petritz, Katherine R Cassady, Kim Love, Julie A Balko","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the sedative effects of intranasal (IN) alfaxalone to IM alfaxalone with or without IM midazolam in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, blinded, crossover study was performed on 8 healthy male cockatiels from February through April 2021. Birds randomly received 4 treatments with at least a 1-week washout period: alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg, IN (IN-A); alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg, IM, with (IM-AM) or without (IM-A) midazolam at 3 mg/kg, IM; and midazolam at 3 mg/kg, IM (IM-M). Time to recumbency and heart and respiratory rates were recorded. Ten minutes following administration, birds were restrained for sham 2-view radiographs and venipuncture. Following venipuncture, flumazenil at 0.1 mg/kg, IM, was administered (IM-AM and IM-M). Time to standing was recorded. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model, a mixed effects γ-regression model, and Cochran Q, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No sedative effects were observed in IN-A. Recumbency was achieved in 0/8, 5/8, 8/8, and 0/8 birds in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Respiratory and heart rates remained within acceptable limits in all birds. Sham radiographs were acquired in 0/8, 1/8, 6/8, and 0/8 birds in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Venipuncture was successful in all birds with median lactate concentrations of 4.9, 2.4, 1.0, and 1.8 mmol/L in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Median (range) time to standing after handling in IM-A and IM-AM was 8.8 (0 to 15.0) and 14.5 (0.6 to 15.5) min, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intranasal alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg did not produce sedation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Intramuscular alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg with midazolam at 3 mg/kg produced sedation in cockatiels.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the sedative effects of intranasal (IN) alfaxalone to IM alfaxalone with or without IM midazolam in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus).

Methods: A prospective, blinded, crossover study was performed on 8 healthy male cockatiels from February through April 2021. Birds randomly received 4 treatments with at least a 1-week washout period: alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg, IN (IN-A); alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg, IM, with (IM-AM) or without (IM-A) midazolam at 3 mg/kg, IM; and midazolam at 3 mg/kg, IM (IM-M). Time to recumbency and heart and respiratory rates were recorded. Ten minutes following administration, birds were restrained for sham 2-view radiographs and venipuncture. Following venipuncture, flumazenil at 0.1 mg/kg, IM, was administered (IM-AM and IM-M). Time to standing was recorded. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model, a mixed effects γ-regression model, and Cochran Q, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: No sedative effects were observed in IN-A. Recumbency was achieved in 0/8, 5/8, 8/8, and 0/8 birds in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Respiratory and heart rates remained within acceptable limits in all birds. Sham radiographs were acquired in 0/8, 1/8, 6/8, and 0/8 birds in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Venipuncture was successful in all birds with median lactate concentrations of 4.9, 2.4, 1.0, and 1.8 mmol/L in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Median (range) time to standing after handling in IM-A and IM-AM was 8.8 (0 to 15.0) and 14.5 (0.6 to 15.5) min, respectively.

Conclusions: Intranasal alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg did not produce sedation.

Clinical relevance: Intramuscular alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg with midazolam at 3 mg/kg produced sedation in cockatiels.

与肌内注射有或没有咪达唑仑的阿法梭龙相比,鼻内注射阿法梭龙在凤尾鹦鹉(荷兰小虾)中不产生镇静作用。
目的比较阿伐沙龙鼻内注射(IN)与阿伐沙龙即时注射(IM)加或不加咪达唑仑对凤头鹦鹉(Nymphicus hollandicus)的镇静效果:从 2021 年 2 月到 4 月,对 8 只健康雄性鹦鹉进行了前瞻性、盲法、交叉研究。鸟类随机接受4种治疗,至少有1周的冲洗期:阿法沙隆,15毫克/千克,IN(IN-A);阿法沙隆,15毫克/千克,IM,含(IM-AM)或不含(IM-A)咪达唑仑,3毫克/千克,IM;咪达唑仑,3毫克/千克,IM(IM-M)。记录昏睡时间、心率和呼吸频率。给药 10 分钟后,将鸟类束缚起来,进行假性 2 视角射线照相和静脉穿刺。静脉穿刺后,注射 0.1 毫克/千克的氟马西尼(IM-AM 和 IM-M)。记录站立时间。数据分析采用线性混合模型、混合效应γ回归模型、Cochran Q、Friedman 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验:在 IN-A 中未观察到镇静效果。在IN-A、IM-A、IM-AM和IM-M中,分别有0/8、5/8、8/8和0/8只鸡实现了卧位。所有鸽子的呼吸频率和心率均保持在可接受的范围内。在 IN-A、IM-A、IM-AM 和 IM-M 中,分别有 0/8、1/8、6/8 和 0/8 只鸽子获得了假体 X 光片。所有鸽子的静脉穿刺均成功,IN-A、IM-A、IM-AM 和 IM-M 的乳酸浓度中位数分别为 4.9、2.4、1.0 和 1.8 mmol/L。IM-A和IM-AM处理后站立的中位时间(范围)分别为8.8(0至15.0)分钟和14.5(0.6至15.5)分钟:结论:15 毫克/千克的阿伐沙龙鞘内注射不会产生镇静作用:临床意义:15 毫克/千克的阿法沙酮与 3 毫克/千克的咪达唑仑一起肌肉注射可使鹦鹉产生镇静作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信