{"title":"Evaluation of cardiothoracic ratios in clinically healthy cats using planimetric analysis of standard radiographic projections.","authors":"Shiekh Imran","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine normal reference ranges for end-inspiratory and end-expiratory planimetric cardiothoracic ratios in apparently healthy domestic shorthair cats using plain digital thoracic radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The planimetric cardiothoracic ratio, calculated by comparing the areas of the cardiac and thoracic cavity silhouettes, was used to assess the cardiac size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Planimetric cardiothoracic ratios varied significantly across radiographic views and respiratory phases. In the right lateral view, the mean end-inspiratory ratio was 22.17% (range, 17.42% to 27.02%), increasing to 25.51% (range, 20.47% to 32.6%) at end expiration. The left lateral view showed a similar pattern, with mean values of 21.15% (range, 18.07% to 25.5%) at end inspiration and 24.28% (range, 20.34% to 29.19%) at end expiration. Dorsoventral and ventrodorsal views exhibited higher ratios, with mean end-inspiratory values of 28.31% (range, 24.43% to 38.85%) and 27.96% (range, 22.96% to 33.57%), respectively, increasing to 32.70% (range, 27.91% to 42.92%) and 31.56% (range, 24.71% to 45.24%) at end expiration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study provides reference values for cardiac size based on the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio. Given the distinct contrast between the cardiac and thoracic silhouettes and the ease of calculation, this ratio may serve as a useful tool for assessing cardiac size in cats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potential influence of general anesthesia and the specific phase of the cardiac cycle on the cardiac silhouette measurements, as well as the possibility of subtle misalignments or rotational errors during image acquisition, could compromise the accuracy of cardiothoracic measurements. The reliability of the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio in reflecting cardiac size changes in feline heart disease necessitates additional study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine normal reference ranges for end-inspiratory and end-expiratory planimetric cardiothoracic ratios in apparently healthy domestic shorthair cats using plain digital thoracic radiographs.
Methods: The planimetric cardiothoracic ratio, calculated by comparing the areas of the cardiac and thoracic cavity silhouettes, was used to assess the cardiac size.
Results: Planimetric cardiothoracic ratios varied significantly across radiographic views and respiratory phases. In the right lateral view, the mean end-inspiratory ratio was 22.17% (range, 17.42% to 27.02%), increasing to 25.51% (range, 20.47% to 32.6%) at end expiration. The left lateral view showed a similar pattern, with mean values of 21.15% (range, 18.07% to 25.5%) at end inspiration and 24.28% (range, 20.34% to 29.19%) at end expiration. Dorsoventral and ventrodorsal views exhibited higher ratios, with mean end-inspiratory values of 28.31% (range, 24.43% to 38.85%) and 27.96% (range, 22.96% to 33.57%), respectively, increasing to 32.70% (range, 27.91% to 42.92%) and 31.56% (range, 24.71% to 45.24%) at end expiration.
Clinical relevance: This study provides reference values for cardiac size based on the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio. Given the distinct contrast between the cardiac and thoracic silhouettes and the ease of calculation, this ratio may serve as a useful tool for assessing cardiac size in cats.
Conclusions: Potential influence of general anesthesia and the specific phase of the cardiac cycle on the cardiac silhouette measurements, as well as the possibility of subtle misalignments or rotational errors during image acquisition, could compromise the accuracy of cardiothoracic measurements. The reliability of the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio in reflecting cardiac size changes in feline heart disease necessitates additional study.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.