Evaluation of cardiothoracic ratios in clinically healthy cats using planimetric analysis of standard radiographic projections.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Shiekh Imran
{"title":"Evaluation of cardiothoracic ratios in clinically healthy cats using planimetric analysis of standard radiographic projections.","authors":"Shiekh Imran","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine normal reference ranges for end-inspiratory and end-expiratory planimetric cardiothoracic ratios in apparently healthy domestic shorthair cats using plain digital thoracic radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The planimetric cardiothoracic ratio, calculated by comparing the areas of the cardiac and thoracic cavity silhouettes, was used to assess the cardiac size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Planimetric cardiothoracic ratios varied significantly across radiographic views and respiratory phases. In the right lateral view, the mean end-inspiratory ratio was 22.17% (range, 17.42% to 27.02%), increasing to 25.51% (range, 20.47% to 32.6%) at end expiration. The left lateral view showed a similar pattern, with mean values of 21.15% (range, 18.07% to 25.5%) at end inspiration and 24.28% (range, 20.34% to 29.19%) at end expiration. Dorsoventral and ventrodorsal views exhibited higher ratios, with mean end-inspiratory values of 28.31% (range, 24.43% to 38.85%) and 27.96% (range, 22.96% to 33.57%), respectively, increasing to 32.70% (range, 27.91% to 42.92%) and 31.56% (range, 24.71% to 45.24%) at end expiration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study provides reference values for cardiac size based on the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio. Given the distinct contrast between the cardiac and thoracic silhouettes and the ease of calculation, this ratio may serve as a useful tool for assessing cardiac size in cats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potential influence of general anesthesia and the specific phase of the cardiac cycle on the cardiac silhouette measurements, as well as the possibility of subtle misalignments or rotational errors during image acquisition, could compromise the accuracy of cardiothoracic measurements. The reliability of the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio in reflecting cardiac size changes in feline heart disease necessitates additional study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine normal reference ranges for end-inspiratory and end-expiratory planimetric cardiothoracic ratios in apparently healthy domestic shorthair cats using plain digital thoracic radiographs.

Methods: The planimetric cardiothoracic ratio, calculated by comparing the areas of the cardiac and thoracic cavity silhouettes, was used to assess the cardiac size.

Results: Planimetric cardiothoracic ratios varied significantly across radiographic views and respiratory phases. In the right lateral view, the mean end-inspiratory ratio was 22.17% (range, 17.42% to 27.02%), increasing to 25.51% (range, 20.47% to 32.6%) at end expiration. The left lateral view showed a similar pattern, with mean values of 21.15% (range, 18.07% to 25.5%) at end inspiration and 24.28% (range, 20.34% to 29.19%) at end expiration. Dorsoventral and ventrodorsal views exhibited higher ratios, with mean end-inspiratory values of 28.31% (range, 24.43% to 38.85%) and 27.96% (range, 22.96% to 33.57%), respectively, increasing to 32.70% (range, 27.91% to 42.92%) and 31.56% (range, 24.71% to 45.24%) at end expiration.

Clinical relevance: This study provides reference values for cardiac size based on the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio. Given the distinct contrast between the cardiac and thoracic silhouettes and the ease of calculation, this ratio may serve as a useful tool for assessing cardiac size in cats.

Conclusions: Potential influence of general anesthesia and the specific phase of the cardiac cycle on the cardiac silhouette measurements, as well as the possibility of subtle misalignments or rotational errors during image acquisition, could compromise the accuracy of cardiothoracic measurements. The reliability of the planimetric cardiothoracic ratio in reflecting cardiac size changes in feline heart disease necessitates additional study.

用标准放射影像投影的平面分析评价临床健康猫的心胸比值。
目的:利用数字胸片平片确定明显健康的家养短毛猫吸气末和呼气末胸廓比例的正常参考范围。方法:通过比较心脏和胸腔轮廓面积计算胸廓比来评估心脏大小。结果:胸廓平面比在x线片和呼吸相上变化显著。右侧观,平均末吸气比为22.17%(范围,17.42% ~ 27.02%),呼气末时增加至25.51%(范围,20.47% ~ 32.6%)。左侧位图显示相似的模式,吸气端平均值为21.15%(范围,18.07%至25.5%),呼气端平均值为24.28%(范围,20.34%至29.19%)。腹侧位和背侧位的平均吸气值分别为28.31%(范围,24.43% ~ 38.85%)和27.96%(范围,22.96% ~ 33.57%),呼气末吸气值分别为32.70%(范围,27.91% ~ 42.92%)和31.56%(范围,24.71% ~ 45.24%)。临床意义:本研究为基于胸廓比的心脏大小提供了参考值。考虑到心脏和胸部轮廓之间的明显对比以及易于计算,这个比率可以作为评估猫心脏大小的有用工具。结论:全身麻醉和心脏周期的特定阶段对心脏轮廓测量的潜在影响,以及图像采集过程中可能出现的细微错位或旋转误差,可能会损害心胸测量的准确性。平面胸廓比值在反映猫心脏病心脏大小变化方面的可靠性需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信