{"title":"Super-resolution algorithms for Imaging FCS enhancement: A comparative study.","authors":"Shambhavi Pandey, Nithin Pathoor, Thorsten Wohland","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the structure and dynamics of biological systems is often limited by the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Imaging fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (ImFCS) is a powerful technique for capturing molecular dynamics with high temporal precision but remains diffraction-limited. This constraint poses challenges for quantifying dynamics of subcellular structures like membrane-proximal cortical actin fibers. Computational super-resolution microscopy (CSRM) presents an accessible strategy for enhancing spatial resolution without specialized instrumentation, enabling compatibility with ImFCS. In this study, we evaluated various CSRM techniques, including super-resolution radial fluctuations (SRRF), mean-shift super-resolution (MSSR), and multiple signal classification imaging (MUSICAL), among others, using TIRF datasets of actin fibers labeled with F-tractin-mApple. By combining structural masks from TIRF and CSRM, we distinguished off-fiber, mixed, and on-fiber regions for region-specific diffusion analyses. Although all CSRM algorithms improve ImFCS data analysis, SRRF demonstrated superior performance in identifying cortical actin fibers, showing minimal variance in on-fiber diffusion coefficients. These findings establish a framework for integrating CSRM with ImFCS to achieve high-resolution spatial and dynamic characterization of subcellular structures from single measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the structure and dynamics of biological systems is often limited by the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Imaging fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (ImFCS) is a powerful technique for capturing molecular dynamics with high temporal precision but remains diffraction-limited. This constraint poses challenges for quantifying dynamics of subcellular structures like membrane-proximal cortical actin fibers. Computational super-resolution microscopy (CSRM) presents an accessible strategy for enhancing spatial resolution without specialized instrumentation, enabling compatibility with ImFCS. In this study, we evaluated various CSRM techniques, including super-resolution radial fluctuations (SRRF), mean-shift super-resolution (MSSR), and multiple signal classification imaging (MUSICAL), among others, using TIRF datasets of actin fibers labeled with F-tractin-mApple. By combining structural masks from TIRF and CSRM, we distinguished off-fiber, mixed, and on-fiber regions for region-specific diffusion analyses. Although all CSRM algorithms improve ImFCS data analysis, SRRF demonstrated superior performance in identifying cortical actin fibers, showing minimal variance in on-fiber diffusion coefficients. These findings establish a framework for integrating CSRM with ImFCS to achieve high-resolution spatial and dynamic characterization of subcellular structures from single measurements.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.