Implementing VIRADS score for image-guided assessment of muscle invasiveness in bladder cancer pre-TURBT: An updated meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905998.2024.2442256
Ahmad R Al-Qudimat, Doaa Sabir, Muna Elamin, Mica Ching, Seif B Altahtamouni, Kalpana Singh, Ibrahim A Khalil, Khalid Alrumaihi
{"title":"Implementing VIRADS score for image-guided assessment of muscle invasiveness in bladder cancer pre-TURBT: An updated meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmad R Al-Qudimat, Doaa Sabir, Muna Elamin, Mica Ching, Seif B Altahtamouni, Kalpana Singh, Ibrahim A Khalil, Khalid Alrumaihi","doi":"10.1080/20905998.2024.2442256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder urothelial carcinoma is the most prevalent malignancy of the urinary system worldwide. Accurate staging of bladder cancer, particularly distinguishing between non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), is essential for determining appropriate treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) scoring system using multiparametric MRI in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the VI-RADS scoring system using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish between NMIBC and MIBC were included. Data from eligible studies were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, and heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression and subgroup analyses by using STATA V17.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 studies, comprising 3,798 bladder cancer patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting MIBC using a VI-RADS cutoff score of ≥ 3 was 89%, with moderate heterogeneity observed across studies. Subgroup analysis revealed variations in diagnostic performance based on geographic location (North America, Europe, and Asia), MRI technical parameters, and study design. Studies utilizing 3.0 Tesla MRI scanners and those involving multiple radiologists demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VI-RADS system demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between NMIBC and MIBC, with a cutoff score of ≥ 3 yielding optimal sensitivity and specificity. Its integration into clinical practice has the potential to reduce the need for invasive procedures, improve staging accuracy, and expedite treatment decisions. Future research should focus on standardizing MRI protocols and further validating these findings across diverse clinical settings to enhance the utility of VI-RADS in bladder cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"23 2","pages":"97-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2442256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bladder urothelial carcinoma is the most prevalent malignancy of the urinary system worldwide. Accurate staging of bladder cancer, particularly distinguishing between non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), is essential for determining appropriate treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) scoring system using multiparametric MRI in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the VI-RADS scoring system using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish between NMIBC and MIBC were included. Data from eligible studies were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, and heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression and subgroup analyses by using STATA V17.0.

Results: A total of 31 studies, comprising 3,798 bladder cancer patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting MIBC using a VI-RADS cutoff score of ≥ 3 was 89%, with moderate heterogeneity observed across studies. Subgroup analysis revealed variations in diagnostic performance based on geographic location (North America, Europe, and Asia), MRI technical parameters, and study design. Studies utilizing 3.0 Tesla MRI scanners and those involving multiple radiologists demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion: The VI-RADS system demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between NMIBC and MIBC, with a cutoff score of ≥ 3 yielding optimal sensitivity and specificity. Its integration into clinical practice has the potential to reduce the need for invasive procedures, improve staging accuracy, and expedite treatment decisions. Future research should focus on standardizing MRI protocols and further validating these findings across diverse clinical settings to enhance the utility of VI-RADS in bladder cancer management.

采用 VIRADS 评分在图像引导下评估膀胱癌 TURBT 前的肌肉侵犯性:最新荟萃分析。
背景:膀胱尿路上皮癌是全球发病率最高的泌尿系统恶性肿瘤。对膀胱癌进行准确分期,尤其是区分非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)和肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC),对于确定适当的治疗方法至关重要。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估使用多参数磁共振成像技术的膀胱成像报告和数据系统(VI-RADS)评分系统在区分非肌层浸润性膀胱癌和肌层浸润性膀胱癌方面的诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性:按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。在 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行了全面检索,检索期截至 2023 年 12 月。纳入了使用多参数磁共振成像(MRI)评估 VI-RADS 评分系统诊断 NMIBC 和 MIBC 准确性的研究。从符合条件的研究中提取数据以计算汇总灵敏度和特异性,并使用 STATA V17.0 进行元回归和亚组分析以评估异质性:荟萃分析共纳入了 31 项研究,包括 3,798 名膀胱癌患者。使用 VI-RADS 临界评分≥ 3 预测 MIBC 的汇总灵敏度和特异度为 89%,各研究之间存在中度异质性。亚组分析显示,基于地理位置(北美、欧洲和亚洲)、MRI 技术参数和研究设计的诊断性能存在差异。使用 3.0 特斯拉核磁共振扫描仪和有多名放射科医生参与的研究显示出更高的诊断准确性:VI-RADS系统在区分NMIBC和MIBC方面具有很高的诊断准确性,临界分值≥3能产生最佳的敏感性和特异性。将其纳入临床实践有可能减少对侵入性手术的需求,提高分期的准确性,并加快治疗决策的制定。未来的研究应重点关注核磁共振成像方案的标准化,并在不同的临床环境中进一步验证这些发现,以提高 VI-RADS 在膀胱癌治疗中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信