Efficacy of Silodosin and Tadalafil monotherapy versus combination of both drugs as MET for distal ureteric stones: A prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905998.2024.2403274
Tamer Diab, Abdallah Fathi, Amr S El-Dakhakhny, Ahmed Abou Elezz
{"title":"Efficacy of Silodosin and Tadalafil monotherapy versus combination of both drugs as MET for distal ureteric stones: A prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Tamer Diab, Abdallah Fathi, Amr S El-Dakhakhny, Ahmed Abou Elezz","doi":"10.1080/20905998.2024.2403274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess efficacy and safety of silodosin, tadalafil, versus combination of both medications as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial included 128 patients aged 18 years or more irrespective of gender who are presented to emergency department or outpatient with distal ureteric stones ranging in size from 5-10 mm, randomized into three groups: Group I (<i>n</i> = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily, Group II (<i>n</i> = 44) received Tadalafil 5 mg once daily, and Group III (<i>n</i> = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg combined with Tadalafil 5 mg one daily. All participants underwent thorough history-taking, routine laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations.The primary end point included expulsion rate and time and treatment tolerance. Secondary end points were number pain episodes, need for emergency room visit, amount of analgesia, need for intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expulsion rate was 71.4% for silodosin, 61.4% for tadalafil and 88.1% for combined therapy (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Expulsion time was significantly shorter after combined therapy 10.4 + 3.5 days, while after silodosin 14.1 + 4 days, while 17.8 + 3.4 days after tadalafil (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The number of pain episodes, emergency room visits, and the amount of analgesia were significantly in favour of combined therapy (<i>p</i> value 0.004, 0.010, and <0.001) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of Silodosin with Tadalafil as a MET for distal ureteric stones is more effective than monotherapy with tolerable side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"23 2","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2403274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of silodosin, tadalafil, versus combination of both medications as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric stones.

Methods: This prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial included 128 patients aged 18 years or more irrespective of gender who are presented to emergency department or outpatient with distal ureteric stones ranging in size from 5-10 mm, randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily, Group II (n = 44) received Tadalafil 5 mg once daily, and Group III (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg combined with Tadalafil 5 mg one daily. All participants underwent thorough history-taking, routine laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations.The primary end point included expulsion rate and time and treatment tolerance. Secondary end points were number pain episodes, need for emergency room visit, amount of analgesia, need for intervention.

Results: The expulsion rate was 71.4% for silodosin, 61.4% for tadalafil and 88.1% for combined therapy (p = 0.018). Expulsion time was significantly shorter after combined therapy 10.4 + 3.5 days, while after silodosin 14.1 + 4 days, while 17.8 + 3.4 days after tadalafil (p < 0.001). The number of pain episodes, emergency room visits, and the amount of analgesia were significantly in favour of combined therapy (p value 0.004, 0.010, and <0.001) respectively.

Conclusions: A combination of Silodosin with Tadalafil as a MET for distal ureteric stones is more effective than monotherapy with tolerable side effects.

目的评估西洛多辛、他达拉非和两种药物联合作为输尿管远端结石药物排石疗法(MET)的疗效和安全性:这项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验纳入了128名年龄在18岁或18岁以上、因输尿管远端结石(大小为5-10毫米)就诊于急诊科或门诊的患者,不分性别,随机分为三组:第一组(42 人)接受西洛多辛 8 毫克治疗,每天一次;第二组(44 人)接受他达拉非 5 毫克治疗,每天一次;第三组(42 人)接受西洛多辛 8 毫克联合他达拉非 5 毫克治疗,每天一次。所有参与者都接受了全面的病史采集、常规实验室检查和临床检查。主要终点包括排出率和时间以及治疗耐受性。次要终点包括疼痛发作次数、急诊就诊需求、镇痛剂量、干预需求:西洛多辛的排出率为 71.4%,他达拉非为 61.4%,联合疗法为 88.1%(P = 0.018)。联合疗法的排出时间为 10.4 + 3.5 天,西洛多辛的排出时间为 14.1 + 4 天,而他达拉非的排出时间为 17.8 + 3.4 天(P 值分别为 0.004、0.010 和结论):西洛多辛联合他达拉非作为治疗输尿管远端结石的 MET 比单一疗法更有效,且副作用可耐受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信