Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide on Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparative Studies

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jimmy Wen, Burhaan Syed, Denise Nadora, Christiane How-Volkman, Ethan Bernstein, Alina Truong, Muzammil Akhtar, Adam Razick, Jose Puglisi, Eldo Frezza
{"title":"Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide on Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparative Studies","authors":"Jimmy Wen,&nbsp;Burhaan Syed,&nbsp;Denise Nadora,&nbsp;Christiane How-Volkman,&nbsp;Ethan Bernstein,&nbsp;Alina Truong,&nbsp;Muzammil Akhtar,&nbsp;Adam Razick,&nbsp;Jose Puglisi,&nbsp;Eldo Frezza","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as an efficacious treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have demonstrated substantial weight loss effects. This systematic review compares two prevalent GLP-1RAs, tirzepatide and semaglutide, with their weight loss effects and rates of adverse events (AEs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for direct comparative studies between tirzepatide and semaglutide. A meta-analysis was conducted via a random-effects model to analyse the differences in weight loss outcomes between study cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four studies, with 28,827 patients (14,870 tirzepatide/13,928 semaglutide), mean age of 55.7 years (52.0 to 63.7) and mean follow-up of 35.9 weeks (23.6 to 44.6), were included in this study. Mean weight change across four studies for tirzepatide and semaglutide was −11.4% (−15.3% to −8.27%) and −7.3% (−8.3% to −6.08%), respectively. The meta-analysis supports these findings with a mean difference of −4.84 kg (95% CI: −6.21 to −3.47), favouring tirzepatide. The most common AEs were minor and moderate-severity gastrointestinal (GI) AEs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Current literature supports tirzepatide demonstrating a higher impact on weight loss than semaglutide, with both demonstrating high rates of minimal- to moderate-severity AEs. Further research with comparative head-to-head trials will better elucidate these weight loss effects and safety profiles.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as an efficacious treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have demonstrated substantial weight loss effects. This systematic review compares two prevalent GLP-1RAs, tirzepatide and semaglutide, with their weight loss effects and rates of adverse events (AEs).

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for direct comparative studies between tirzepatide and semaglutide. A meta-analysis was conducted via a random-effects model to analyse the differences in weight loss outcomes between study cohorts.

Results

Four studies, with 28,827 patients (14,870 tirzepatide/13,928 semaglutide), mean age of 55.7 years (52.0 to 63.7) and mean follow-up of 35.9 weeks (23.6 to 44.6), were included in this study. Mean weight change across four studies for tirzepatide and semaglutide was −11.4% (−15.3% to −8.27%) and −7.3% (−8.3% to −6.08%), respectively. The meta-analysis supports these findings with a mean difference of −4.84 kg (95% CI: −6.21 to −3.47), favouring tirzepatide. The most common AEs were minor and moderate-severity gastrointestinal (GI) AEs.

Conclusion

Current literature supports tirzepatide demonstrating a higher impact on weight loss than semaglutide, with both demonstrating high rates of minimal- to moderate-severity AEs. Further research with comparative head-to-head trials will better elucidate these weight loss effects and safety profiles.

Abstract Image

替西帕肽与西马鲁肽对2型糖尿病患者体重减轻的影响:直接比较研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已成为治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的有效药物,并显示出显著的减肥效果。本系统综述比较了两种流行的GLP-1RAs,替西帕肽和西马鲁肽的减肥效果和不良事件(ae)发生率。方法根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行系统检索,寻找替西帕肽和西马鲁肽的直接比较研究。通过随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,分析研究队列之间减肥结果的差异。结果纳入4项研究,28827例患者(替西帕肽14870例/西马鲁肽13928例),平均年龄55.7岁(52.0 ~ 63.7岁),平均随访35.9周(23.6 ~ 44.6周)。在四项研究中,替西帕肽和西马鲁肽的平均体重变化分别为- 11.4%(- 15.3%至- 8.27%)和- 7.3%(- 8.3%至- 6.08%)。荟萃分析支持这些发现,平均差异为- 4.84 kg (95% CI: - 6.21至- 3.47),支持替西肽。最常见的ae是轻度和中度胃肠道(GI) ae。结论:目前的文献支持替西帕肽比西马鲁肽对减肥的影响更大,两者都显示出高发生率的轻至中度ae。进一步的研究与比较头对头试验将更好地阐明这些减肥效果和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信