Jimmy Wen, Burhaan Syed, Denise Nadora, Christiane How-Volkman, Ethan Bernstein, Alina Truong, Muzammil Akhtar, Adam Razick, Jose Puglisi, Eldo Frezza
{"title":"Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide on Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparative Studies","authors":"Jimmy Wen, Burhaan Syed, Denise Nadora, Christiane How-Volkman, Ethan Bernstein, Alina Truong, Muzammil Akhtar, Adam Razick, Jose Puglisi, Eldo Frezza","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as an efficacious treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have demonstrated substantial weight loss effects. This systematic review compares two prevalent GLP-1RAs, tirzepatide and semaglutide, with their weight loss effects and rates of adverse events (AEs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for direct comparative studies between tirzepatide and semaglutide. A meta-analysis was conducted via a random-effects model to analyse the differences in weight loss outcomes between study cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four studies, with 28,827 patients (14,870 tirzepatide/13,928 semaglutide), mean age of 55.7 years (52.0 to 63.7) and mean follow-up of 35.9 weeks (23.6 to 44.6), were included in this study. Mean weight change across four studies for tirzepatide and semaglutide was −11.4% (−15.3% to −8.27%) and −7.3% (−8.3% to −6.08%), respectively. The meta-analysis supports these findings with a mean difference of −4.84 kg (95% CI: −6.21 to −3.47), favouring tirzepatide. The most common AEs were minor and moderate-severity gastrointestinal (GI) AEs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Current literature supports tirzepatide demonstrating a higher impact on weight loss than semaglutide, with both demonstrating high rates of minimal- to moderate-severity AEs. Further research with comparative head-to-head trials will better elucidate these weight loss effects and safety profiles.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as an efficacious treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have demonstrated substantial weight loss effects. This systematic review compares two prevalent GLP-1RAs, tirzepatide and semaglutide, with their weight loss effects and rates of adverse events (AEs).
Methods
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for direct comparative studies between tirzepatide and semaglutide. A meta-analysis was conducted via a random-effects model to analyse the differences in weight loss outcomes between study cohorts.
Results
Four studies, with 28,827 patients (14,870 tirzepatide/13,928 semaglutide), mean age of 55.7 years (52.0 to 63.7) and mean follow-up of 35.9 weeks (23.6 to 44.6), were included in this study. Mean weight change across four studies for tirzepatide and semaglutide was −11.4% (−15.3% to −8.27%) and −7.3% (−8.3% to −6.08%), respectively. The meta-analysis supports these findings with a mean difference of −4.84 kg (95% CI: −6.21 to −3.47), favouring tirzepatide. The most common AEs were minor and moderate-severity gastrointestinal (GI) AEs.
Conclusion
Current literature supports tirzepatide demonstrating a higher impact on weight loss than semaglutide, with both demonstrating high rates of minimal- to moderate-severity AEs. Further research with comparative head-to-head trials will better elucidate these weight loss effects and safety profiles.