Algebraic patterns, protocols, and pseudocode for a Quine–McCluskey minimization in lieu of the prime implicant chart

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Elizabeth Abraham
{"title":"Algebraic patterns, protocols, and pseudocode for a Quine–McCluskey minimization in lieu of the prime implicant chart","authors":"Elizabeth Abraham","doi":"10.1007/s10825-025-02278-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digital gates are the basic electronic component of digital circuits. These circuits perform best when they are simplified as this directly leads to reducing the number of digital gates to implement a logical function, thereby reducing the circuit cost. To do this, Boolean expressions need to be optimally minimized. Karnaugh (K-map) and the Quine–McCluskey (Q–M) methods are well-known techniques to simplify Boolean techniques. K-map executions become complex for many valued functions. Comparatively, the Q–M method is a computer-based faster approach for logic function-based simplification. However, the Q–M method becomes intolerable for many valued logical functions along with its computational complexity and intensiveness simultaneously increasing. Hence, in this study an algebraic sum (A-sum) and cross-check sum (CCS) is proposed, primarily to aid in computationally efficient pairing of high numbered groups particularly for many valued logical functions and secondly to check the correctness of the paired groups as a manner to review the sanctity of the paired groups. In addition, broadly six postulates are proposed to forego the prime implicant chart in the Q–M method. In this study, the expounding of the prior through examples show that by reducing the number of computations from that which would be typically required of by the conventional Q–M method, the performance of the Q–M method is increased along with the reduction of the possibility of an error and an accurate minimization. The results can be expanded to an n-numbered logic function leading to more hardware efficient circuits. Moreover, the postulate approach is simpler, more efficient with less effort than with the use of the prime implicant tables. The proposed approach is a useful aid for both academics and industrialists where logic, digital and circuit design takes precedence at optimal performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Electronics","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10825-025-02278-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10825-025-02278-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital gates are the basic electronic component of digital circuits. These circuits perform best when they are simplified as this directly leads to reducing the number of digital gates to implement a logical function, thereby reducing the circuit cost. To do this, Boolean expressions need to be optimally minimized. Karnaugh (K-map) and the Quine–McCluskey (Q–M) methods are well-known techniques to simplify Boolean techniques. K-map executions become complex for many valued functions. Comparatively, the Q–M method is a computer-based faster approach for logic function-based simplification. However, the Q–M method becomes intolerable for many valued logical functions along with its computational complexity and intensiveness simultaneously increasing. Hence, in this study an algebraic sum (A-sum) and cross-check sum (CCS) is proposed, primarily to aid in computationally efficient pairing of high numbered groups particularly for many valued logical functions and secondly to check the correctness of the paired groups as a manner to review the sanctity of the paired groups. In addition, broadly six postulates are proposed to forego the prime implicant chart in the Q–M method. In this study, the expounding of the prior through examples show that by reducing the number of computations from that which would be typically required of by the conventional Q–M method, the performance of the Q–M method is increased along with the reduction of the possibility of an error and an accurate minimization. The results can be expanded to an n-numbered logic function leading to more hardware efficient circuits. Moreover, the postulate approach is simpler, more efficient with less effort than with the use of the prime implicant tables. The proposed approach is a useful aid for both academics and industrialists where logic, digital and circuit design takes precedence at optimal performance.

代模式,协议,和伪代码奎因-麦克卢斯基最小化代替素数隐含图
数字门是数字电路的基本电子元件。这些电路在简化时表现最佳,因为这直接导致减少数字门的数量来实现逻辑功能,从而降低电路成本。要做到这一点,需要将布尔表达式优化到最小。Karnaugh (K-map)和Quine-McCluskey (Q-M)方法是众所周知的简化布尔技术的技术。对于许多有值函数,K-map的执行变得复杂。相比之下,Q-M方法是一种基于计算机的基于逻辑函数的快速简化方法。然而,随着Q-M方法的计算复杂度和密集性同时增加,它对许多有价值的逻辑函数变得难以忍受。因此,在本研究中,提出了代数和(a -sum)和交叉核对和(CCS),主要是为了帮助计算高效的高编号群配对,特别是对于许多有值的逻辑函数,其次是为了检查配对群的正确性,作为一种审查成对群的神圣性的方式。此外,在Q-M方法中,提出了六个基本假设,以避免质数隐含图。在本研究中,通过实例对先验的阐述表明,通过减少传统Q-M方法通常需要的计算次数,Q-M方法的性能得到提高,同时减少了误差和精确最小化的可能性。结果可以扩展到n编号的逻辑函数,从而实现更高效的硬件电路。此外,假设方法比使用素数隐含表更简单、更有效、更省力。所提出的方法对于逻辑、数字和电路设计优先于最佳性能的学者和工业家都是有用的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Electronics
Journal of Computational Electronics ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-PHYSICS, APPLIED
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
142
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: he Journal of Computational Electronics brings together research on all aspects of modeling and simulation of modern electronics. This includes optical, electronic, mechanical, and quantum mechanical aspects, as well as research on the underlying mathematical algorithms and computational details. The related areas of energy conversion/storage and of molecular and biological systems, in which the thrust is on the charge transport, electronic, mechanical, and optical properties, are also covered. In particular, we encourage manuscripts dealing with device simulation; with optical and optoelectronic systems and photonics; with energy storage (e.g. batteries, fuel cells) and harvesting (e.g. photovoltaic), with simulation of circuits, VLSI layout, logic and architecture (based on, for example, CMOS devices, quantum-cellular automata, QBITs, or single-electron transistors); with electromagnetic simulations (such as microwave electronics and components); or with molecular and biological systems. However, in all these cases, the submitted manuscripts should explicitly address the electronic properties of the relevant systems, materials, or devices and/or present novel contributions to the physical models, computational strategies, or numerical algorithms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信