TCO analysis of commercial vehicles considering refined temperature impacts across various provinces in China

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Mingyue Hu , Yue Yuan , Zilai Wang , Xinyu Wang , Wenzuo Zhang , Wenjun Chen , Chuanbo Xu
{"title":"TCO analysis of commercial vehicles considering refined temperature impacts across various provinces in China","authors":"Mingyue Hu ,&nbsp;Yue Yuan ,&nbsp;Zilai Wang ,&nbsp;Xinyu Wang ,&nbsp;Wenzuo Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenjun Chen ,&nbsp;Chuanbo Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the face of climate change, a global initiative to mitigate emissions is conspicuous, with China striving for carbon neutrality and targeting commercial vehicle emissions. This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the total cost of ownership (TCO) for five types of commercial vehicle models in various provinces of China under three fuel options: diesel, electric, and hydrogen fuel cell. The study systematically quantifies the cost differences and applicability of different fuel types and vehicle models at the provincial level, as well as the nuanced impact of temperature variations. The results indicate that electric trucks with a capacity of 4.5-ton (4.5 t) and 49-ton (49 t) exhibit significantly better cost-effectiveness compared to diesel and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCEVs). Specifically, the transportation cost per hundred kilometers for a 4.5 t electric truck is only half that of a diesel truck, while the 49 t electric truck is approximately 100 CNY less than a diesel truck and 63 % less than a hydrogen fuel cell truck. However, the 18-ton (18 t) electric truck, due to its higher purchase cost, shows advantages only in a few regions. In terms of buses, both electric and hydrogen fuel cell models have higher transportation costs than diesel vehicles due to their higher fuel and purchase costs. Although FCEVs currently have higher costs, their economic competitiveness will be enhanced when the price of hydrogen drops below 40 CNY/kg. The study also found that the main factors affecting TCO are fuel costs and depreciation costs. Diesel vehicles are sensitive to fluctuations in fuel prices, while the TCO of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is primarily influenced by electricity prices and temperature changes. High or low temperatures can affect the proportion of fuel costs in TCO by up to 4 %–6.56 %. The economic viability of FCEVs in each province is highly dependent on the price of hydrogen.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101726"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625000766","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the face of climate change, a global initiative to mitigate emissions is conspicuous, with China striving for carbon neutrality and targeting commercial vehicle emissions. This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the total cost of ownership (TCO) for five types of commercial vehicle models in various provinces of China under three fuel options: diesel, electric, and hydrogen fuel cell. The study systematically quantifies the cost differences and applicability of different fuel types and vehicle models at the provincial level, as well as the nuanced impact of temperature variations. The results indicate that electric trucks with a capacity of 4.5-ton (4.5 t) and 49-ton (49 t) exhibit significantly better cost-effectiveness compared to diesel and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCEVs). Specifically, the transportation cost per hundred kilometers for a 4.5 t electric truck is only half that of a diesel truck, while the 49 t electric truck is approximately 100 CNY less than a diesel truck and 63 % less than a hydrogen fuel cell truck. However, the 18-ton (18 t) electric truck, due to its higher purchase cost, shows advantages only in a few regions. In terms of buses, both electric and hydrogen fuel cell models have higher transportation costs than diesel vehicles due to their higher fuel and purchase costs. Although FCEVs currently have higher costs, their economic competitiveness will be enhanced when the price of hydrogen drops below 40 CNY/kg. The study also found that the main factors affecting TCO are fuel costs and depreciation costs. Diesel vehicles are sensitive to fluctuations in fuel prices, while the TCO of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is primarily influenced by electricity prices and temperature changes. High or low temperatures can affect the proportion of fuel costs in TCO by up to 4 %–6.56 %. The economic viability of FCEVs in each province is highly dependent on the price of hydrogen.
考虑中国各省精细温度影响的商用车TCO分析
面对气候变化,全球减排行动引人注目,中国正在努力实现碳中和,并将目标对准商用车排放。本研究首次全面评估了中国各省五种商用车车型在三种燃料选择下的总体拥有成本(TCO):柴油、电动和氢燃料电池。该研究系统地量化了各省不同燃料类型和车型的成本差异和适用性,以及温度变化的细微影响。结果表明,与柴油和氢燃料电池汽车(fcev)相比,容量为4.5吨(4.5 t)和49吨(49 t)的电动卡车表现出明显更好的成本效益。具体来说,4.5吨电动卡车的百公里运输成本仅为柴油卡车的一半,而49吨电动卡车比柴油卡车低约100元人民币,比氢燃料电池卡车低63%。然而,18吨(18吨)电动卡车由于其较高的购买成本,仅在少数地区显示出优势。在公交车方面,无论是电动汽车还是氢燃料电池汽车,由于燃料和购买成本较高,运输成本都高于柴油车。虽然目前氢燃料电池汽车的成本较高,但当氢价格降至40元/公斤以下时,其经济竞争力将增强。研究还发现,影响TCO的主要因素是燃料成本和折旧成本。柴油车对燃油价格波动较为敏感,而纯电动汽车的TCO主要受电价和气温变化的影响。高温或低温会影响燃料成本在总成本中所占的比例,最高可达4% - 6.56%。氢燃料电池汽车在各省的经济可行性高度依赖于氢的价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信