Radha Ramanan , Christine Van Laer , Sarissa Baert , Cyrielle Kint , Chris Van Geet , Quentin Van Thillo , Peter Verhamme , Thomas Vanassche , James D. McFadyen , Andrew C. Perkins , Huyen A. Tran , Veerle Labarque , Kathleen Freson
{"title":"Clinical utility of panel-based genetic sequencing for von Willebrand disease","authors":"Radha Ramanan , Christine Van Laer , Sarissa Baert , Cyrielle Kint , Chris Van Geet , Quentin Van Thillo , Peter Verhamme , Thomas Vanassche , James D. McFadyen , Andrew C. Perkins , Huyen A. Tran , Veerle Labarque , Kathleen Freson","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder with a wide spectrum of causative variants. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses the entire <em>VWF</em> gene and provides concomitant assessment of other genes allowing differentiation between genocopies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of all patients with confirmed or suspected VWD who were screened with panel-based whole-exome sequencing (WES) for inherited bleeding disorders. Pre-sequencing diagnosis was performed using laboratory measures of VWF activity and quantity. Post-sequencing diagnosis was informed by variant curation in combination with laboratory measures. We measured clinically meaningful changes in the pre- vs post-genetic sequencing diagnosis and subtyping.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 108 patients. The population was predominantly composed of paediatric patients < 18 years old (77/108, 71%) and females (66/108, 61%). The largest pre-sequencing subgroup was those with low VWF (n=61, 56%), followed by type 1 VWD (n=21, 19%) and type 2 not otherwise specified (NOS) (n=18, 17%). A clinically meaningful change in management occurred in 19% (20/108) of the study population. The largest effect was seen in the pre-sequencing type 2 group (67%, 16/24). In the type 2 group who could not be accurately subtyped into 2A/B/M/N prior to sequencing (type 2 NOS), 15/18 (83%) were able to be subtyped or given a different diagnosis post sequencing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Panel-based sequencing for VWD in a well-selected cohort, particularly those with type 2 and type 3 VWD, was clinically relevant in differentiating genocopies, directing therapies and family planning. Sequencing in those with low VWF and type 1 VWD rarely changed management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 102730"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037925000548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder with a wide spectrum of causative variants. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses the entire VWF gene and provides concomitant assessment of other genes allowing differentiation between genocopies.
Methods
We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of all patients with confirmed or suspected VWD who were screened with panel-based whole-exome sequencing (WES) for inherited bleeding disorders. Pre-sequencing diagnosis was performed using laboratory measures of VWF activity and quantity. Post-sequencing diagnosis was informed by variant curation in combination with laboratory measures. We measured clinically meaningful changes in the pre- vs post-genetic sequencing diagnosis and subtyping.
Results
The study included 108 patients. The population was predominantly composed of paediatric patients < 18 years old (77/108, 71%) and females (66/108, 61%). The largest pre-sequencing subgroup was those with low VWF (n=61, 56%), followed by type 1 VWD (n=21, 19%) and type 2 not otherwise specified (NOS) (n=18, 17%). A clinically meaningful change in management occurred in 19% (20/108) of the study population. The largest effect was seen in the pre-sequencing type 2 group (67%, 16/24). In the type 2 group who could not be accurately subtyped into 2A/B/M/N prior to sequencing (type 2 NOS), 15/18 (83%) were able to be subtyped or given a different diagnosis post sequencing.
Conclusion
Panel-based sequencing for VWD in a well-selected cohort, particularly those with type 2 and type 3 VWD, was clinically relevant in differentiating genocopies, directing therapies and family planning. Sequencing in those with low VWF and type 1 VWD rarely changed management.