{"title":"Reevaluating the presence of Rhipicephalus australis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Southeast Asia: A phylogenetic approach based on Cambodian tick samples","authors":"Didot Budi Prasetyo , Sony Yean , Sébastien Boyer","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Morphological variability between <em>Rhipicephalus australis</em> and <em>R. microplus</em> has led to taxonomic ambiguity, leading to species misidentification. <em>Rhipicephalus australis</em> is reported to have a distribution range in Pacific Ocean region extending to several Southeast Asian countries, including Cambodia, although its presence in continental Southeast Asia has not been supported by molecular data. With growing evidence of conflicting morphological characters, this study aimed to evaluate the presence of <em>R. australis</em> in Cambodia using both morphological and molecular identification. Tick specimens were collected from cattle across 21 provinces of Cambodia, and a subset of 95 <em>R. microplus</em> complex (37 morphologically identified as <em>R. australis</em>, 39 <em>R. microplus</em>, and 19 nymphs) was selected for molecular analysis. DNA barcoding of the cox1 gene was performed, and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree revealed that all specimens clustered within <em>R. microplus</em> clade A. These findings, along with previous observations from other regions, suggest that, in the absence of molecular data, there is no definitive evidence to support the presence of <em>R. australis</em> in continental Southeast Asia, particularly in Cambodia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"16 3","pages":"Article 102478"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X25000421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Morphological variability between Rhipicephalus australis and R. microplus has led to taxonomic ambiguity, leading to species misidentification. Rhipicephalus australis is reported to have a distribution range in Pacific Ocean region extending to several Southeast Asian countries, including Cambodia, although its presence in continental Southeast Asia has not been supported by molecular data. With growing evidence of conflicting morphological characters, this study aimed to evaluate the presence of R. australis in Cambodia using both morphological and molecular identification. Tick specimens were collected from cattle across 21 provinces of Cambodia, and a subset of 95 R. microplus complex (37 morphologically identified as R. australis, 39 R. microplus, and 19 nymphs) was selected for molecular analysis. DNA barcoding of the cox1 gene was performed, and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree revealed that all specimens clustered within R. microplus clade A. These findings, along with previous observations from other regions, suggest that, in the absence of molecular data, there is no definitive evidence to support the presence of R. australis in continental Southeast Asia, particularly in Cambodia.
期刊介绍:
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials.
The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.