Assessing the impact of sustainability risks on disaster and pandemic vulnerabilities: A global perspective

Q1 Social Sciences
Abroon Qazi , Linda C. Angell , Mecit Can Emre Simsekler , Abdelkader Daghfous , M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi
{"title":"Assessing the impact of sustainability risks on disaster and pandemic vulnerabilities: A global perspective","authors":"Abroon Qazi ,&nbsp;Linda C. Angell ,&nbsp;Mecit Can Emre Simsekler ,&nbsp;Abdelkader Daghfous ,&nbsp;M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi","doi":"10.1016/j.glt.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of failing to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on disaster and pandemic vulnerabilities, providing a country-level perspective to inform resilience planning. The study introduces the concept of SDG-related risk, defined as the probability of not achieving the desired SDG, and classifies these risks into three categories: high, medium, and low. Using a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) framework, two probabilistic models are developed to evaluate the influence of SDG performance on disaster risk and COVID-19 vulnerability across 165 countries. The results highlight that shortcomings in SDGs such as ‘quality education’, ‘sustainable cities and communities’, ‘no poverty’, and ‘affordable and clean energy’ significantly increase disaster and pandemic risks. Conversely, strong performance in ‘peace, justice and strong institutions’ and ‘life on land’ enhances systemic resilience. Countries with very high disaster risk are particularly exposed to deficiencies in SDGs related to ‘peace, justice and strong institutions’, ‘sustainable cities and communities’, and ‘good health and well-being’. For COVID-19 risk, ‘affordable and clean energy’ emerges as the most critical SDG influencing high-risk exposure, whereas ‘climate action’ is pivotal in predicting low-risk states. These findings demonstrate the cascading risks posed by failing to achieve critical SDGs and emphasize the need for targeted interventions to mitigate vulnerabilities to disasters and pandemics, providing actionable insights for sustainable resilience strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33615,"journal":{"name":"Global Transitions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 159-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791825000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of failing to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on disaster and pandemic vulnerabilities, providing a country-level perspective to inform resilience planning. The study introduces the concept of SDG-related risk, defined as the probability of not achieving the desired SDG, and classifies these risks into three categories: high, medium, and low. Using a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) framework, two probabilistic models are developed to evaluate the influence of SDG performance on disaster risk and COVID-19 vulnerability across 165 countries. The results highlight that shortcomings in SDGs such as ‘quality education’, ‘sustainable cities and communities’, ‘no poverty’, and ‘affordable and clean energy’ significantly increase disaster and pandemic risks. Conversely, strong performance in ‘peace, justice and strong institutions’ and ‘life on land’ enhances systemic resilience. Countries with very high disaster risk are particularly exposed to deficiencies in SDGs related to ‘peace, justice and strong institutions’, ‘sustainable cities and communities’, and ‘good health and well-being’. For COVID-19 risk, ‘affordable and clean energy’ emerges as the most critical SDG influencing high-risk exposure, whereas ‘climate action’ is pivotal in predicting low-risk states. These findings demonstrate the cascading risks posed by failing to achieve critical SDGs and emphasize the need for targeted interventions to mitigate vulnerabilities to disasters and pandemics, providing actionable insights for sustainable resilience strategies.
评估可持续性风险对灾害和大流行病脆弱性的影响:全球视角
本研究考察了未能实现可持续发展目标(sdg)对灾害和大流行病脆弱性的影响,为韧性规划提供了国家层面的视角。该研究引入了可持续发展目标相关风险的概念,将其定义为无法实现预期可持续发展目标的概率,并将这些风险分为高、中、低三类。利用贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)框架,开发了两个概率模型,以评估165个国家的可持续发展目标绩效对灾害风险和COVID-19脆弱性的影响。结果表明,“优质教育”、“可持续城市和社区”、“无贫困”和“负担得起的清洁能源”等可持续发展目标的不足显著增加了灾害和流行病风险。相反,在“和平、正义和强有力的制度”和“陆上生活”方面的良好表现增强了系统的复原力。灾害风险极高的国家在“和平、正义和强有力的机构”、“可持续城市和社区”以及“良好的健康和福祉”等可持续发展目标方面尤其存在不足。对于COVID-19风险,“负担得起的清洁能源”成为影响高风险暴露的最关键的可持续发展目标,而“气候行动”在预测低风险状态方面至关重要。这些调查结果表明,未能实现关键的可持续发展目标会带来连锁风险,并强调需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以减轻对灾害和流行病的脆弱性,为可持续复原力战略提供可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Transitions
Global Transitions Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信