Xiangping Liu, Zhuowei Hu, Yongcai Wang, Mi Wang, Wenxing Hou
{"title":"Spatial scale effects on the response strength of water resources supply-demand balance to driving factors","authors":"Xiangping Liu, Zhuowei Hu, Yongcai Wang, Mi Wang, Wenxing Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amidst escalating global climate change and intensifying anthropogenic activities, the imbalance between water supply and demand has become a critical sustainability challenge. Nevertheless, our understanding of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the water resources supply–demand balance is limited, particularly regarding scale-dependent responses of driving factors. Therefore, this study adopts a geographical perspective, focusing on the Haihe River Basin — an internationally recognized water-scarce region. By integrating machine learning and GIS spatial analysis techniques, it reveals the multi-scale spatial relationships and mechanisms between various factors, including natural and socio-economic ones, in the water resources supply–demand system, from the aspects of feature importance, variable correlation, and spatial heterogeneity. The results show that the Haihe River Basin faces severe water shortages. Compared to localized water shortages at finer scales (grid scale), regional average water scarcity is more pronounced at coarser scales (sub-basin and city scales), suggesting that management strategies based on a single scale may have limited applicability. Additionally, the response of water supply and demand to driving factors exhibits uncertainty influenced by spatial scale. Specifically, the correlation between water supply and natural factors such as precipitation and slope is stronger at the sub-basin scale than at the city scale. As for water demand, at the city scale, factors with strong correlations become more pronounced, with human factors having a greater influence on water demand. The effect scale of influencing factors on water supply is smaller, while the effect scale on water demand is larger. Topographic factors such as elevation and slope show significant spatial heterogeneity in water demand, whereas climatic and vegetation factors exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity in water supply. Natural geographical factors tend to exhibit smaller effect scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113431"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Amidst escalating global climate change and intensifying anthropogenic activities, the imbalance between water supply and demand has become a critical sustainability challenge. Nevertheless, our understanding of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the water resources supply–demand balance is limited, particularly regarding scale-dependent responses of driving factors. Therefore, this study adopts a geographical perspective, focusing on the Haihe River Basin — an internationally recognized water-scarce region. By integrating machine learning and GIS spatial analysis techniques, it reveals the multi-scale spatial relationships and mechanisms between various factors, including natural and socio-economic ones, in the water resources supply–demand system, from the aspects of feature importance, variable correlation, and spatial heterogeneity. The results show that the Haihe River Basin faces severe water shortages. Compared to localized water shortages at finer scales (grid scale), regional average water scarcity is more pronounced at coarser scales (sub-basin and city scales), suggesting that management strategies based on a single scale may have limited applicability. Additionally, the response of water supply and demand to driving factors exhibits uncertainty influenced by spatial scale. Specifically, the correlation between water supply and natural factors such as precipitation and slope is stronger at the sub-basin scale than at the city scale. As for water demand, at the city scale, factors with strong correlations become more pronounced, with human factors having a greater influence on water demand. The effect scale of influencing factors on water supply is smaller, while the effect scale on water demand is larger. Topographic factors such as elevation and slope show significant spatial heterogeneity in water demand, whereas climatic and vegetation factors exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity in water supply. Natural geographical factors tend to exhibit smaller effect scales.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.