Spatial scale effects on the response strength of water resources supply-demand balance to driving factors

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xiangping Liu, Zhuowei Hu, Yongcai Wang, Mi Wang, Wenxing Hou
{"title":"Spatial scale effects on the response strength of water resources supply-demand balance to driving factors","authors":"Xiangping Liu,&nbsp;Zhuowei Hu,&nbsp;Yongcai Wang,&nbsp;Mi Wang,&nbsp;Wenxing Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amidst escalating global climate change and intensifying anthropogenic activities, the imbalance between water supply and demand has become a critical sustainability challenge. Nevertheless, our understanding of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the water resources supply–demand balance is limited, particularly regarding scale-dependent responses of driving factors. Therefore, this study adopts a geographical perspective, focusing on the Haihe River Basin — an internationally recognized water-scarce region. By integrating machine learning and GIS spatial analysis techniques, it reveals the multi-scale spatial relationships and mechanisms between various factors, including natural and socio-economic ones, in the water resources supply–demand system, from the aspects of feature importance, variable correlation, and spatial heterogeneity. The results show that the Haihe River Basin faces severe water shortages. Compared to localized water shortages at finer scales (grid scale), regional average water scarcity is more pronounced at coarser scales (sub-basin and city scales), suggesting that management strategies based on a single scale may have limited applicability. Additionally, the response of water supply and demand to driving factors exhibits uncertainty influenced by spatial scale. Specifically, the correlation between water supply and natural factors such as precipitation and slope is stronger at the sub-basin scale than at the city scale. As for water demand, at the city scale, factors with strong correlations become more pronounced, with human factors having a greater influence on water demand. The effect scale of influencing factors on water supply is smaller, while the effect scale on water demand is larger. Topographic factors such as elevation and slope show significant spatial heterogeneity in water demand, whereas climatic and vegetation factors exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity in water supply. Natural geographical factors tend to exhibit smaller effect scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113431"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amidst escalating global climate change and intensifying anthropogenic activities, the imbalance between water supply and demand has become a critical sustainability challenge. Nevertheless, our understanding of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the water resources supply–demand balance is limited, particularly regarding scale-dependent responses of driving factors. Therefore, this study adopts a geographical perspective, focusing on the Haihe River Basin — an internationally recognized water-scarce region. By integrating machine learning and GIS spatial analysis techniques, it reveals the multi-scale spatial relationships and mechanisms between various factors, including natural and socio-economic ones, in the water resources supply–demand system, from the aspects of feature importance, variable correlation, and spatial heterogeneity. The results show that the Haihe River Basin faces severe water shortages. Compared to localized water shortages at finer scales (grid scale), regional average water scarcity is more pronounced at coarser scales (sub-basin and city scales), suggesting that management strategies based on a single scale may have limited applicability. Additionally, the response of water supply and demand to driving factors exhibits uncertainty influenced by spatial scale. Specifically, the correlation between water supply and natural factors such as precipitation and slope is stronger at the sub-basin scale than at the city scale. As for water demand, at the city scale, factors with strong correlations become more pronounced, with human factors having a greater influence on water demand. The effect scale of influencing factors on water supply is smaller, while the effect scale on water demand is larger. Topographic factors such as elevation and slope show significant spatial heterogeneity in water demand, whereas climatic and vegetation factors exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity in water supply. Natural geographical factors tend to exhibit smaller effect scales.
水资源供需平衡对驱动因子响应强度的空间尺度效应
在全球气候变化加剧和人类活动加剧的背景下,水资源供需失衡已成为可持续发展面临的严峻挑战。然而,我们对水资源供需平衡的时空异质性的理解有限,特别是对驱动因素的尺度依赖性响应。因此,本研究采用地理视角,以国际公认的缺水地区——海河流域为研究对象。结合机器学习和GIS空间分析技术,从特征重要性、变量相关性和空间异质性等方面揭示水资源供需系统中自然因素和社会经济因素之间的多尺度空间关系和机制。结果表明,海河流域面临着严重的水资源短缺问题。与更细尺度(网格尺度)的局部缺水相比,区域平均缺水在更大尺度(子流域和城市尺度)上更为明显,这表明基于单一尺度的管理策略可能适用性有限。此外,水资源供需对驱动因素的响应表现出受空间尺度影响的不确定性。具体而言,供水与降水、坡度等自然因子的相关性在次流域尺度上强于城市尺度。在城市尺度上,相关性强的因素更加明显,其中人为因素对需水量的影响更大。影响因子对供水量的影响规模较小,而对需水量的影响规模较大。高程和坡度等地形因子在需水量上表现出显著的空间异质性,而气候和植被因子在供水量上表现出显著的空间异质性。自然地理因素的影响尺度较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信