{"title":"Creep deformation of the viscoelastic lumbar tissues: Effects of trunk flexion posture, exposure-recovery schedule, and individual flexibility","authors":"Sang Hyeon Kang , Gary A. Mirka","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>In-vivo</em> human experiments have previously shown significant effects of trunk flexion angle and exposure-recovery schedule on the creep response of the viscoelastic tissues of the lumbar spine. In the current study we explore the effects of trunk flexion, exposure-recovery schedules, and lumbar flexibility on this creep response. Sixteen participants, categorized into two groups based on lumbar flexibility (GROUP: low-flexible, high-flexible), performed four 30-minute protocols consisting of alternating periods of trunk flexion (exposure) and periods of upright standing (recovery). On four different days, combinations of two trunk flexion postures (POSTURE: Max, SubMax) and two exposure-recovery schedules (ER: Long (3 min:6 min), Short (1 min:2 min)) were tested. Trunk flexion–extension motions were performed before/after the 30-minute protocol to capture the changes in peak lumbar flexion angles and changes in the angles of flexion-relaxation in L3/L4 paraspinals that resulted from the protocols. The analysis of lumbar flexibility showed that the low-flexible group had significantly greater changes in the L4 flexion-relaxation angle in the Max posture (Δ2.2°) than in the SubMax posture (Δ1.0°), while the high-flexible group showed no POSTURE effect, indicating a POSTURE × GROUP interaction. In addition, the high-flexible group exhibited greater creep responses in the Short (1:2) condition (Δ2.5°) than in the Long (3:6) condition (Δ0.6°) while the low-flexible group showed no ER effect, denoting an ER × GROUP interaction. Collectively, these results support the complex, multi-dimensional nature of viscoelastic creep responses, and particularly note the impact of an individual’s lumbar flexibility in these responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 112675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025001873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In-vivo human experiments have previously shown significant effects of trunk flexion angle and exposure-recovery schedule on the creep response of the viscoelastic tissues of the lumbar spine. In the current study we explore the effects of trunk flexion, exposure-recovery schedules, and lumbar flexibility on this creep response. Sixteen participants, categorized into two groups based on lumbar flexibility (GROUP: low-flexible, high-flexible), performed four 30-minute protocols consisting of alternating periods of trunk flexion (exposure) and periods of upright standing (recovery). On four different days, combinations of two trunk flexion postures (POSTURE: Max, SubMax) and two exposure-recovery schedules (ER: Long (3 min:6 min), Short (1 min:2 min)) were tested. Trunk flexion–extension motions were performed before/after the 30-minute protocol to capture the changes in peak lumbar flexion angles and changes in the angles of flexion-relaxation in L3/L4 paraspinals that resulted from the protocols. The analysis of lumbar flexibility showed that the low-flexible group had significantly greater changes in the L4 flexion-relaxation angle in the Max posture (Δ2.2°) than in the SubMax posture (Δ1.0°), while the high-flexible group showed no POSTURE effect, indicating a POSTURE × GROUP interaction. In addition, the high-flexible group exhibited greater creep responses in the Short (1:2) condition (Δ2.5°) than in the Long (3:6) condition (Δ0.6°) while the low-flexible group showed no ER effect, denoting an ER × GROUP interaction. Collectively, these results support the complex, multi-dimensional nature of viscoelastic creep responses, and particularly note the impact of an individual’s lumbar flexibility in these responses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.