Lin Yang , Huiyun Hou , Haodong Lv , Guanqi Wu , Bang Xu , Yiming Li
{"title":"Exploring the development path of bioenergy carbon capture and storage for achieving carbon neutrality in China: A systematic review","authors":"Lin Yang , Huiyun Hou , Haodong Lv , Guanqi Wu , Bang Xu , Yiming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is essential for achieving carbon neutrality targets, whereas relevant demonstration projects have not yet been prioritized in China. This study attempts to investigate the development path of BECCS in China through mapping out a spatial and temporal development path considering practice advantages and underlying difficulties. It suggests that small-scale demonstration projects should be implemented before 2030 when biomass technologies should evolve from fuel substitution to material substitution. Between 2030 and 2040, large-scale biomass co-firing related BECCS projects can be deployed as a result of the maturation of biomass pretreatment technologies and second-generation capture technology, potentially leading to an emissions reduction of 80–100 Mt/a. In light of the challenges in source-sink matching, the early projects characterized with vertical integration and joint venture business models may be concentrated in the <em>Northeast</em>, <em>North</em> and <em>East</em> areas. Beyond 2040, advancements in combined fuel & material substitution and other integrated zero or negative carbon technologies are likely to facilitate pure biomass burning-related BECCS projects with emission reduction ranging from 300 to 600 Mt/a. By then, the flexible BECCS operator and transport operator business models can be promoted. Notably, if CO<sub>2</sub> utilization technologies and offshore storage technologies are proven feasible, large-scale deployment can be achieved in the biomass-rich <em>southwest</em> and <em>southeast Coastal</em> areas. However, the <em>northwest</em> area may face restrictions due to limited scarce biomass resources. Additionally, intensive biomass collection mode, potential environmental damages (e.g. water consumption), global cooperation mechanism, etc. should also be highly regarded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 115685"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is essential for achieving carbon neutrality targets, whereas relevant demonstration projects have not yet been prioritized in China. This study attempts to investigate the development path of BECCS in China through mapping out a spatial and temporal development path considering practice advantages and underlying difficulties. It suggests that small-scale demonstration projects should be implemented before 2030 when biomass technologies should evolve from fuel substitution to material substitution. Between 2030 and 2040, large-scale biomass co-firing related BECCS projects can be deployed as a result of the maturation of biomass pretreatment technologies and second-generation capture technology, potentially leading to an emissions reduction of 80–100 Mt/a. In light of the challenges in source-sink matching, the early projects characterized with vertical integration and joint venture business models may be concentrated in the Northeast, North and East areas. Beyond 2040, advancements in combined fuel & material substitution and other integrated zero or negative carbon technologies are likely to facilitate pure biomass burning-related BECCS projects with emission reduction ranging from 300 to 600 Mt/a. By then, the flexible BECCS operator and transport operator business models can be promoted. Notably, if CO2 utilization technologies and offshore storage technologies are proven feasible, large-scale deployment can be achieved in the biomass-rich southwest and southeast Coastal areas. However, the northwest area may face restrictions due to limited scarce biomass resources. Additionally, intensive biomass collection mode, potential environmental damages (e.g. water consumption), global cooperation mechanism, etc. should also be highly regarded.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.