Everyday laboratories: Collective speculation and energy futures

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Farhan Samanani , Hannah Knox , Enrico Costanza , Georgia Panagiotidou , Mike Fell , Kyrill Potapov
{"title":"Everyday laboratories: Collective speculation and energy futures","authors":"Farhan Samanani ,&nbsp;Hannah Knox ,&nbsp;Enrico Costanza ,&nbsp;Georgia Panagiotidou ,&nbsp;Mike Fell ,&nbsp;Kyrill Potapov","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing public concern surrounding climate change has not always led to better public knowledge of what might constitute effective action, while growing knowledge does not always produce greater concern. We argue that this gap between knowledge and concern is reproduced by prevailing practices for anticipating energy futures – including those associated with top-down modelling and forecasting, and those attempting to imagine or infer alternative futures from the bottom up. In response, we develop a concept of ‘collective speculation’, inspired in particular by the work of Bruno Latour. Collective speculation, we argue, strives to create common futures by attending to diverse interests and affordances in order to cultivate connections between different forms of knowledge, political concerns, actors and worlds. We illustrate and unpack this concept by exploring our own practice as researchers working on a project using sensors and data visualization to explore collective responses to climate change. We trace practices of collective speculation within the workings of the team itself, as well as across our relations with a key partner and the everyday worlds of our participants, in order to show how collective speculation generates collectives animated by interconnected forms of concern and knowledge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 103594"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing public concern surrounding climate change has not always led to better public knowledge of what might constitute effective action, while growing knowledge does not always produce greater concern. We argue that this gap between knowledge and concern is reproduced by prevailing practices for anticipating energy futures – including those associated with top-down modelling and forecasting, and those attempting to imagine or infer alternative futures from the bottom up. In response, we develop a concept of ‘collective speculation’, inspired in particular by the work of Bruno Latour. Collective speculation, we argue, strives to create common futures by attending to diverse interests and affordances in order to cultivate connections between different forms of knowledge, political concerns, actors and worlds. We illustrate and unpack this concept by exploring our own practice as researchers working on a project using sensors and data visualization to explore collective responses to climate change. We trace practices of collective speculation within the workings of the team itself, as well as across our relations with a key partner and the everyday worlds of our participants, in order to show how collective speculation generates collectives animated by interconnected forms of concern and knowledge.
日常实验室:集体投机和能源未来
公众对气候变化日益增长的关注并不总是导致公众更好地了解什么可能构成有效的行动,而不断增长的知识并不总是产生更大的关注。我们认为,这种知识和关注之间的差距在预测能源未来的普遍做法中得到了再现——包括那些与自上而下的建模和预测有关的做法,以及那些试图自下而上地想象或推断替代未来的做法。作为回应,我们开发了一个“集体投机”的概念,特别受到布鲁诺·拉图尔作品的启发。我们认为,集体思辨努力通过关注不同的利益和能力来创造共同的未来,从而培养不同形式的知识、政治关切、行动者和世界之间的联系。作为研究人员,我们利用传感器和数据可视化来探索对气候变化的集体反应,通过探索我们自己的实践来说明和解释这一概念。我们在团队本身的工作中追踪集体思考的实践,以及我们与关键合作伙伴和参与者的日常世界的关系,以展示集体思考如何通过相互关联的关注和知识形式产生集体的活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信