{"title":"The US healthcare system facilitates medical conspiracy theories: A call to action","authors":"C. Bobier, J. Obeid","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medical conspiracy theories pose a public health risk and erode trust in healthcare providers. While research continues on the psychological, social, and evolutionary foundations of conspiratorial thinking, as well as on intervention strategies, less attention has been given to the role of healthcare system structures. This paper examines how the design and delivery of the U.S. healthcare system contribute to the spread of medical conspiracy theories. Using a two-pronged analytical framework, we (1) identify key features of the U.S. healthcare system and patient experience and (2) map these features onto known psychological and social drivers of conspiratorial beliefs. We argue that addressing medical conspiracy theories requires not only individual or community-level interventions but also structural reforms in healthcare. Researchers should therefore explore the feasibility and impact of systematic changes in mitigating conspiratorial thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Medical conspiracy theories pose a public health risk and erode trust in healthcare providers. While research continues on the psychological, social, and evolutionary foundations of conspiratorial thinking, as well as on intervention strategies, less attention has been given to the role of healthcare system structures. This paper examines how the design and delivery of the U.S. healthcare system contribute to the spread of medical conspiracy theories. Using a two-pronged analytical framework, we (1) identify key features of the U.S. healthcare system and patient experience and (2) map these features onto known psychological and social drivers of conspiratorial beliefs. We argue that addressing medical conspiracy theories requires not only individual or community-level interventions but also structural reforms in healthcare. Researchers should therefore explore the feasibility and impact of systematic changes in mitigating conspiratorial thinking.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.