‘The road to net zero runs through the resources sector’: Metallurgical coal and the changing politics of climate in Australia

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ellie Martus
{"title":"‘The road to net zero runs through the resources sector’: Metallurgical coal and the changing politics of climate in Australia","authors":"Ellie Martus","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While thermal coal is front and centre of debates about climate change, metallurgical coal has received far less attention. This is despite its significant role in steel production and the substantial GHG emissions created during steelmaking. This analysis examines the politics of metallurgical coal in Australia, the world's largest exporter, and the extent to which this varies from our understanding of thermal coal politics. It asks how pro-metallurgical coal actors from government (state and federal) and industry discuss metallurgical coal's future in the context of climate change. Through a discourse analysis of documentary data including corporate communication, parliamentary records, and media coverage, the findings show how actors use discursive framings to advocate for continued metallurgical coal production and export. There are parallels between thermal and metallurgical coal discourses, with coal linked to the national interest, and emphasis on industry's contribution to supporting communities and providing employment. However, at the same time, actors have sought to reorient the industry around steel production. The fundamental role that steel plays in renewable energy infrastructure (e.g., wind turbines and solar panels), coupled with the present lack of economically viable alternatives to metallurgical coal in steel production, paradoxically means that metallurgical coal is central to decarbonisation – at least for now. Overall, this analysis this contributes to our understanding of the dynamic and changing nature of decarbonisation politics. It highlights the need to pay greater attention to the complexities of transition pathways, including the role that high-emission commodities like metallurgical coal may play in driving decarbonisation until low-emission technologies catch up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104047"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While thermal coal is front and centre of debates about climate change, metallurgical coal has received far less attention. This is despite its significant role in steel production and the substantial GHG emissions created during steelmaking. This analysis examines the politics of metallurgical coal in Australia, the world's largest exporter, and the extent to which this varies from our understanding of thermal coal politics. It asks how pro-metallurgical coal actors from government (state and federal) and industry discuss metallurgical coal's future in the context of climate change. Through a discourse analysis of documentary data including corporate communication, parliamentary records, and media coverage, the findings show how actors use discursive framings to advocate for continued metallurgical coal production and export. There are parallels between thermal and metallurgical coal discourses, with coal linked to the national interest, and emphasis on industry's contribution to supporting communities and providing employment. However, at the same time, actors have sought to reorient the industry around steel production. The fundamental role that steel plays in renewable energy infrastructure (e.g., wind turbines and solar panels), coupled with the present lack of economically viable alternatives to metallurgical coal in steel production, paradoxically means that metallurgical coal is central to decarbonisation – at least for now. Overall, this analysis this contributes to our understanding of the dynamic and changing nature of decarbonisation politics. It highlights the need to pay greater attention to the complexities of transition pathways, including the role that high-emission commodities like metallurgical coal may play in driving decarbonisation until low-emission technologies catch up.
“通往净零排放的道路贯穿于资源行业”:焦煤和澳大利亚气候政治的变化
虽然动力煤是气候变化辩论的前沿和中心,但冶金煤受到的关注要少得多。尽管它在钢铁生产中发挥着重要作用,而且在炼钢过程中产生了大量的温室气体排放。本分析考察了世界上最大的出口国澳大利亚的冶金煤政治,以及这与我们对动力煤政治的理解的差异程度。它询问来自政府(州和联邦)和行业的亲冶金煤行为者如何在气候变化的背景下讨论冶金煤的未来。通过对包括企业传播、议会记录和媒体报道在内的文献数据的话语分析,研究结果显示了参与者如何使用话语框架来倡导冶金煤的持续生产和出口。热煤和冶金煤的论述有相似之处,它们将煤炭与国家利益联系起来,并强调工业对支持社区和提供就业的贡献。然而,与此同时,参与者们试图围绕钢铁生产重新调整该行业的方向。钢铁在可再生能源基础设施(如风力涡轮机和太阳能电池板)中发挥的基本作用,加上目前在钢铁生产中缺乏经济上可行的冶金煤替代品,矛盾的是,这意味着冶金煤是脱碳的核心——至少目前如此。总的来说,这一分析有助于我们理解脱碳政治的动态和不断变化的本质。报告强调,需要更多地关注转型路径的复杂性,包括焦煤等高排放商品在推动脱碳过程中可能发挥的作用,直到低排放技术迎头赶上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信