Conservation effectiveness of Chinese protected areas on the completeness of medium- and large-bodied mammal community

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Lu Zhang , Li Yang , Xinyu Huang , Sheng Li , Wei Wang , Chi Ma , Hanlan Fei , Pengfei Fan
{"title":"Conservation effectiveness of Chinese protected areas on the completeness of medium- and large-bodied mammal community","authors":"Lu Zhang ,&nbsp;Li Yang ,&nbsp;Xinyu Huang ,&nbsp;Sheng Li ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Chi Ma ,&nbsp;Hanlan Fei ,&nbsp;Pengfei Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protected areas (PAs) are essential to the success of global biodiversity conservation, and effectiveness evaluations with quantitative indexes are critically needed to enhance PA performance. Although species richness has been widely used as an index, it is naturally different among ecoregions, making large scale comparison across ecoregions inappropriate. Here, we suggest using the completeness index (CI) and defaunation index (DI) of animal communities as alternative indexes. We compiled a camera-trapping dataset consisting of over 2,023,000 camera days and 619,000 independent detections of 98 medium- and large-bodied mammals (MLMs) in 115 Chinese nature reserves. We then assessed CI and DI of MLMs for each reserve, and identified the environmental and social economic variables that may affect these indexes. We found that CIs and DIs varied greatly among these reserves, and we provided a list of reserves with high conservation priority (with high CIs) and those require restoration efforts (with high DIs). Furthermore, we found that medium-bodied mammals had a higher DI than large-bodied, herbivores had a higher DI than omnivores, and protected species had a higher DI than unprotected species. We also found that MLM communities were better retained in PAs with higher elevation and lower temperature. PA size, the reduction of human disturbances by PA, and scientific research also contributed to MLM community conservation. Our study provides suggestions to improve PA management in China, and demonstrates a new framework to evaluate conservation effectiveness of PAs across ecoregions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"306 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072500165X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are essential to the success of global biodiversity conservation, and effectiveness evaluations with quantitative indexes are critically needed to enhance PA performance. Although species richness has been widely used as an index, it is naturally different among ecoregions, making large scale comparison across ecoregions inappropriate. Here, we suggest using the completeness index (CI) and defaunation index (DI) of animal communities as alternative indexes. We compiled a camera-trapping dataset consisting of over 2,023,000 camera days and 619,000 independent detections of 98 medium- and large-bodied mammals (MLMs) in 115 Chinese nature reserves. We then assessed CI and DI of MLMs for each reserve, and identified the environmental and social economic variables that may affect these indexes. We found that CIs and DIs varied greatly among these reserves, and we provided a list of reserves with high conservation priority (with high CIs) and those require restoration efforts (with high DIs). Furthermore, we found that medium-bodied mammals had a higher DI than large-bodied, herbivores had a higher DI than omnivores, and protected species had a higher DI than unprotected species. We also found that MLM communities were better retained in PAs with higher elevation and lower temperature. PA size, the reduction of human disturbances by PA, and scientific research also contributed to MLM community conservation. Our study provides suggestions to improve PA management in China, and demonstrates a new framework to evaluate conservation effectiveness of PAs across ecoregions.
中国保护区对大中型哺乳动物群落完整性的保护效果
保护区是全球生物多样性保护工作的重要组成部分,为了提高保护区的保护效果,迫切需要定量指标的有效性评价。虽然物种丰富度作为一种指标已被广泛使用,但不同生态区域间的物种丰富度自然存在差异,不适合进行大尺度的跨生态区域比较。在此,我们建议采用动物群落的完备性指数(CI)和退化性指数(DI)作为替代指标。我们编制了一个由中国115个自然保护区的98种大中型哺乳动物(mlm)的2023,000多个相机日和619,000个独立检测组成的相机捕获数据集。然后,我们评估了每个保护区传销模型的CI和DI,并确定了可能影响这些指数的环境和社会经济变量。结果表明,保护区的ci值和di值存在较大差异,并给出了保护优先级高的保护区(ci值高)和需要修复的保护区(di值高)的列表。此外,我们发现中等体型哺乳动物的DI高于大型体型,食草动物的DI高于杂食动物,保护物种的DI高于未保护物种。我们还发现,在海拔越高、温度越低的保护区中,传销群落保留得越好。人工林规模、人工林减少人为干扰和科学研究对传销群落保护也有促进作用。本研究为改善中国保护区管理提供了建议,并展示了一个评估生态区域保护区保护效果的新框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信