Clinical implementation of AI-based screening for risk for opioid use disorder in hospitalized adults

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Majid Afshar, Felice Resnik, Cara Joyce, Madeline Oguss, Dmitriy Dligach, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Anne Gravel Sullivan, Matthew M. Churpek, Brian W. Patterson, Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar, Frank J. Liao, Cherodeep Goswami, Randy Brown, Marlon P. Mundt
{"title":"Clinical implementation of AI-based screening for risk for opioid use disorder in hospitalized adults","authors":"Majid Afshar, Felice Resnik, Cara Joyce, Madeline Oguss, Dmitriy Dligach, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Anne Gravel Sullivan, Matthew M. Churpek, Brian W. Patterson, Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar, Frank J. Liao, Cherodeep Goswami, Randy Brown, Marlon P. Mundt","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03603-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adults with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at increased risk for opioid-related complications and repeated hospital admissions. Routine screening for patients at risk for an OUD to prevent complications is not standard practice in many hospitals, leading to missed opportunities for intervention. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer a scalable approach to systematically identify at-risk patients for evidence-based care. This pre–post quasi-experimental study evaluated whether an AI-driven OUD screener embedded in the EHR was non-inferior to usual care in identifying patients for addiction medicine consultations, aiming to provide a similarly effective but more scalable alternative to human-led ad hoc consultations. The AI screener used a convolutional neural network to analyze EHR notes in real time, identifying patients at risk and recommending consultations. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed a consultation with an addiction medicine specialist, which included interventions such as outpatient treatment referral, management of complicated withdrawal, medication management for OUD and harm reduction services. The study period consisted of a 16-month pre-intervention phase followed by an 8-month post-intervention phase, during which the AI screener was implemented to support hospital providers in identifying patients for consultation. Consultations did not change between periods (1.35% versus 1.51%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001 for non-inferiority). In secondary outcome analysis, the AI screener was associated with a reduction in 30-day readmissions (odds ratio: 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.91, <i>P</i> = 0.02) with an incremental cost of US$6,801 per readmission avoided, demonstrating its potential as a scalable, cost-effective solution for OUD care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05745480.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03603-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adults with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at increased risk for opioid-related complications and repeated hospital admissions. Routine screening for patients at risk for an OUD to prevent complications is not standard practice in many hospitals, leading to missed opportunities for intervention. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer a scalable approach to systematically identify at-risk patients for evidence-based care. This pre–post quasi-experimental study evaluated whether an AI-driven OUD screener embedded in the EHR was non-inferior to usual care in identifying patients for addiction medicine consultations, aiming to provide a similarly effective but more scalable alternative to human-led ad hoc consultations. The AI screener used a convolutional neural network to analyze EHR notes in real time, identifying patients at risk and recommending consultations. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed a consultation with an addiction medicine specialist, which included interventions such as outpatient treatment referral, management of complicated withdrawal, medication management for OUD and harm reduction services. The study period consisted of a 16-month pre-intervention phase followed by an 8-month post-intervention phase, during which the AI screener was implemented to support hospital providers in identifying patients for consultation. Consultations did not change between periods (1.35% versus 1.51%, P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). In secondary outcome analysis, the AI screener was associated with a reduction in 30-day readmissions (odds ratio: 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.91, P = 0.02) with an incremental cost of US$6,801 per readmission avoided, demonstrating its potential as a scalable, cost-effective solution for OUD care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05745480.

Abstract Image

基于人工智能的住院成人阿片类药物使用障碍风险筛查的临床实施情况
患有阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的成年人发生阿片类药物相关并发症和反复住院的风险增加。在许多医院,对有OUD风险的患者进行常规筛查以预防并发症并不是标准做法,导致错过了干预的机会。电子健康记录(EHRs)的采用和人工智能(AI)的进步提供了一种可扩展的方法,可以系统地识别有风险的患者,进行循证护理。这项pre-post准实验研究评估了嵌入电子病历中的人工智能驱动的OUD筛查器在识别成瘾药物咨询患者方面是否不逊于常规护理,旨在提供一种同样有效但更可扩展的替代方案,以替代人工主导的临时咨询。人工智能筛选器使用卷积神经网络实时分析电子病历记录,识别有风险的患者并建议咨询。主要结果是完成成瘾医学专家咨询的患者比例,其中包括门诊治疗转诊、复杂戒断管理、OUD药物管理和减少伤害服务等干预措施。研究期间包括16个月的干预前阶段和8个月的干预后阶段,在此期间实施了人工智能筛查,以支持医院提供者识别需要咨询的患者。咨询在不同时期之间没有变化(1.35%对1.51%,非劣效性P <; 0.001)。在次要结果分析中,人工智能筛查与减少30天再入院相关(优势比:0.53,95%置信区间:0.30-0.91,P = 0.02),每次避免再入院的增量成本为6,801美元,表明其作为OUD护理可扩展的、具有成本效益的解决方案的潜力。ClinicalTrials.gov注册:NCT05745480。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信