Cognitive and Language Abilities Associated With Reading in Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Karin Nilsson, Åsa Elwér, David Messer, Henrik Danielsson
{"title":"Cognitive and Language Abilities Associated With Reading in Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Karin Nilsson, Åsa Elwér, David Messer, Henrik Danielsson","doi":"10.1177/07419325251328644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive and language abilities influence literacy outcomes in individuals with intellectual disability (ID). The aim of this study was to investigate abilities associated with decoding and reading comprehension in individuals with ID with a systematic review and a correlational meta-analysis. A total of 26 studies with 27 samples and 1,137 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that reading comprehension was significantly related to decoding ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .63), vocabulary ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .51), listening comprehension ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .43), and IQ ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .32). Decoding was significantly related to phonological awareness ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .52), phonological short-term memory ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .46), rapid automatized naming ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = −.44), vocabulary ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .34), chronological age ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .26), IQ ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .30), visual short-term memory ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .24), and executive-loaded working memory ( <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .32). Limitations connected to unexplained heterogeneity and study quality were found and discussed. This meta-analysis showed that variables identified in studies of typically developing children are relevant for individuals with ID indicating that theories about literacy could reasonably be applied to this population.","PeriodicalId":48042,"journal":{"name":"Remedial and Special Education","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedial and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251328644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive and language abilities influence literacy outcomes in individuals with intellectual disability (ID). The aim of this study was to investigate abilities associated with decoding and reading comprehension in individuals with ID with a systematic review and a correlational meta-analysis. A total of 26 studies with 27 samples and 1,137 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that reading comprehension was significantly related to decoding ( r = .63), vocabulary ( r = .51), listening comprehension ( r = .43), and IQ ( r = .32). Decoding was significantly related to phonological awareness ( r = .52), phonological short-term memory ( r = .46), rapid automatized naming ( r = −.44), vocabulary ( r = .34), chronological age ( r = .26), IQ ( r = .30), visual short-term memory ( r = .24), and executive-loaded working memory ( r = .32). Limitations connected to unexplained heterogeneity and study quality were found and discussed. This meta-analysis showed that variables identified in studies of typically developing children are relevant for individuals with ID indicating that theories about literacy could reasonably be applied to this population.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Remedial and Special Education
Remedial and Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Remedial and Special Education (RASE) is devoted to the discussion of issues involving the education of persons for whom typical instruction is not effective. Emphasis is on the interpretation of research literature and recommendations for the practice of remedial and special education. Appropriate topics include, but are not limited to, definition, identification, assessment, characteristics, management, and instruction of underachieving and exceptional children, youth, and adults; related services; family involvement; service delivery systems; legislation; litigation; and professional standards and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信