[Recommendations for avoiding medical strain: A comparative analysis of regional responses in Hyogo Prefecture during the eighth wave of COVID-19].

Masanori Hamada, Ryutaro Masago, Kazuo Miyamura, Hiroshi Sumi, Akira Sudou, Masakazu Shinohara
{"title":"[Recommendations for avoiding medical strain: A comparative analysis of regional responses in Hyogo Prefecture during the eighth wave of COVID-19].","authors":"Masanori Hamada, Ryutaro Masago, Kazuo Miyamura, Hiroshi Sumi, Akira Sudou, Masakazu Shinohara","doi":"10.11236/jph.24-096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives During the eighth wave of COVID-19 in Hyogo Prefecture (October 1, 2022-February 28, 2023), the overwhelming transmissibility of the virus caused a significant strain on the healthcare system. This study focused on Amagasaki Health Center, Akashi Health Center, Sumoto Health Center (island region), and Asago Health Center (rural region) and their unique responses. The difference between the calculated \"required number of critical care beds\" (based on hospitalization recommendations) and the number of secured hospital beds was used as a measure of bed capacity strain, while the number of incidents involving difficulty in emergency transport was used as an indicator of a strain on emergency medical services. The aim of this study was to propose strategies to avoid medical system overload during future infectious disease pandemics based on the responses of each health center and regional healthcare system.Methods Each fire department provided information on incidents involving difficulties with emergency transport. The \"required number of critical care beds\" was defined as the cumulative daily number of hospitalization recommendations(minus the number of patients who had exceeded the standard 10-day hospitalization period outlined in the guidelines). In the Amagasaki and Akashi Health Center jurisdictions, the number of patients hospitalized daily based on recommendations was recorded. These data were used to evaluate the validity of the calculated required number of critical care beds and assess the effectiveness of back end support operations.Results Within the Amagasaki Health Center jurisdiction, where a consistent approach was adopted to hospitalize patients at designated medical institutions (from recommendation to discharge), the required number of critical care beds peaked significantly beyond the number of secured hospital beds. This peak coincided with a surge in COVID-19 emergency transport difficulties. In contrast, the Akashi Health Center jurisdiction, with back end support beds, partially mitigated bed-capacity strain and emergency transport difficulties. The Sumoto Health Center's jurisdiction minimized a healthcare strain by prioritizing the continuation of its regular medical care system. In the Asago Health Center jurisdiction, approximately half of the hospital beds were in psychiatric hospitals. Patients in these facilities could continue treatment therein, allowing the region to avoid significant healthcare constraints.Conclusion Increasing the number of secure hospital beds alone is insufficient for preventing regional healthcare strains in SARS-type pandemics, such as COVID-19. Operating back end support systems and enabling self-contained treatment in facilities, such as care homes for older adults and psychiatric hospitals, are effective measures for avoiding this strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives During the eighth wave of COVID-19 in Hyogo Prefecture (October 1, 2022-February 28, 2023), the overwhelming transmissibility of the virus caused a significant strain on the healthcare system. This study focused on Amagasaki Health Center, Akashi Health Center, Sumoto Health Center (island region), and Asago Health Center (rural region) and their unique responses. The difference between the calculated "required number of critical care beds" (based on hospitalization recommendations) and the number of secured hospital beds was used as a measure of bed capacity strain, while the number of incidents involving difficulty in emergency transport was used as an indicator of a strain on emergency medical services. The aim of this study was to propose strategies to avoid medical system overload during future infectious disease pandemics based on the responses of each health center and regional healthcare system.Methods Each fire department provided information on incidents involving difficulties with emergency transport. The "required number of critical care beds" was defined as the cumulative daily number of hospitalization recommendations(minus the number of patients who had exceeded the standard 10-day hospitalization period outlined in the guidelines). In the Amagasaki and Akashi Health Center jurisdictions, the number of patients hospitalized daily based on recommendations was recorded. These data were used to evaluate the validity of the calculated required number of critical care beds and assess the effectiveness of back end support operations.Results Within the Amagasaki Health Center jurisdiction, where a consistent approach was adopted to hospitalize patients at designated medical institutions (from recommendation to discharge), the required number of critical care beds peaked significantly beyond the number of secured hospital beds. This peak coincided with a surge in COVID-19 emergency transport difficulties. In contrast, the Akashi Health Center jurisdiction, with back end support beds, partially mitigated bed-capacity strain and emergency transport difficulties. The Sumoto Health Center's jurisdiction minimized a healthcare strain by prioritizing the continuation of its regular medical care system. In the Asago Health Center jurisdiction, approximately half of the hospital beds were in psychiatric hospitals. Patients in these facilities could continue treatment therein, allowing the region to avoid significant healthcare constraints.Conclusion Increasing the number of secure hospital beds alone is insufficient for preventing regional healthcare strains in SARS-type pandemics, such as COVID-19. Operating back end support systems and enabling self-contained treatment in facilities, such as care homes for older adults and psychiatric hospitals, are effective measures for avoiding this strain.

[避免医疗紧张的建议:第八波新冠肺炎期间兵库县区域应对的比较分析]。
在兵库县的第八波COVID-19(2022年10月1日至2023年2月28日)期间,该病毒的压倒性传播性给医疗系统造成了巨大压力。本研究以日本长崎保健中心、日本明石保健中心、日本素本保健中心(岛屿地区)和日本浅护保健中心(农村地区)为研究对象,分析其独特的反应。计算出的“需要的重症监护病床数目”(根据住院建议)与有保障的医院病床数目之间的差值被用来衡量病床容量的紧张程度,而涉及紧急运输困难的事件数目被用来衡量紧急医疗服务的紧张程度。本研究的目的是根据各卫生中心和区域卫生保健系统的反应,提出避免未来传染病大流行期间医疗系统过载的策略。方法各消防部门提供涉及紧急运输困难的事故信息。“所需的重症监护床位数”的定义是每日累计住院建议数(减去超过指南中规定的标准10天住院期的患者人数)。在amasaki和Akashi保健中心辖区,根据建议记录了每天住院的患者人数。这些数据用于评估计算出的重症监护病床数量的有效性,并评估后端支持操作的有效性。结果在amasaki保健中心辖区内,采用一致的方法将患者在指定的医疗机构住院(从推荐到出院),所需的重症监护床位数量明显超过有保障的医院床位数量。这一高峰恰逢COVID-19紧急运输困难激增。相比之下,明石保健中心辖区的后端支持床部分缓解了床位容量紧张和紧急运输困难。Sumoto健康中心通过优先延续其常规医疗保健系统,将医疗保健压力降至最低。在浅护保健中心辖区,大约一半的医院床位在精神病院。这些设施中的患者可以继续在那里接受治疗,从而使该地区避免严重的保健限制。结论仅靠增加安全病床数量不足以预防COVID-19等sars型大流行的区域性卫生毒株。操作后端支持系统,并在老年人护理院和精神病院等设施中实现独立治疗,是避免这种压力的有效措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信