Healthcare professionals' perception of prolonged-release buprenorphine in opioid use disorder. FOLIPRO Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rodrigo Oraá Gil, Diego Sucunza Guibert, María Yébenes Cortés, Miguel Ángel Casado Gómez, José Joaquín Antón Basanta, Francisco Pascual Pastor, Carlos Roncero
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' perception of prolonged-release buprenorphine in opioid use disorder. FOLIPRO Study.","authors":"Rodrigo Oraá Gil, Diego Sucunza Guibert, María Yébenes Cortés, Miguel Ángel Casado Gómez, José Joaquín Antón Basanta, Francisco Pascual Pastor, Carlos Roncero","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.2007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the FOLIPRO study was to determine the satisfaction and expectations of healthcare professionals with experience in opioid use disorders (OUD) with prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB). FOLIPRO was designed as an anonymous, cross-sectional, multicenter survey aimed at professionals from addiction centers (AC) and penitentiary centers in Spain. The survey collected characteristics of the AC and the healthcare professionals. Possible barriers associated with the prescription of PRB in OUD treatment were also identified. Seventy-four questionnaires were received from 45 different centers. More than half of the centers, 51.1%, were outpatient methadone (MTD) dispensing centers and 31.1% were penitentiary centers. 68.5% of the participants had experience with PRB, which exceeded 6 months in 58.3% of the cases. 31.5% stated that they had no experience, 40% of them mainly due to reimbursement criteria for PRB. Regarding prescribing/administration issues, professionals reported greater satisfaction with PRB compared to MTD and buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BPN/NX). According to healthcare professionals, bureaucracy, lack of knowledge of some prescribers, and patient refusal due to fear of opioid withdrawal were the main barriers described in for prescribing PRB. The results of the study show high satisfaction among healthcare professionals with PRB, positioning PRB as a valuable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":"37 1","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.2007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the FOLIPRO study was to determine the satisfaction and expectations of healthcare professionals with experience in opioid use disorders (OUD) with prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB). FOLIPRO was designed as an anonymous, cross-sectional, multicenter survey aimed at professionals from addiction centers (AC) and penitentiary centers in Spain. The survey collected characteristics of the AC and the healthcare professionals. Possible barriers associated with the prescription of PRB in OUD treatment were also identified. Seventy-four questionnaires were received from 45 different centers. More than half of the centers, 51.1%, were outpatient methadone (MTD) dispensing centers and 31.1% were penitentiary centers. 68.5% of the participants had experience with PRB, which exceeded 6 months in 58.3% of the cases. 31.5% stated that they had no experience, 40% of them mainly due to reimbursement criteria for PRB. Regarding prescribing/administration issues, professionals reported greater satisfaction with PRB compared to MTD and buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BPN/NX). According to healthcare professionals, bureaucracy, lack of knowledge of some prescribers, and patient refusal due to fear of opioid withdrawal were the main barriers described in for prescribing PRB. The results of the study show high satisfaction among healthcare professionals with PRB, positioning PRB as a valuable treatment option.

医疗专业人员对阿片类药物使用障碍中丁丙诺啡缓释的看法。FOLIPRO研究。
folpro研究的目的是确定具有阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的医疗保健专业人员对缓释丁丙诺啡(PRB)的满意度和期望。folpro是一项针对西班牙成瘾中心(AC)和监狱中心的专业人员的匿名、横断面、多中心调查。调查收集了AC和医疗保健专业人员的特征。还确定了在OUD治疗中与PRB处方相关的可能障碍。从45个不同的中心收到74份问卷。超过一半的中心(51.1%)是门诊美沙酮(MTD)配药中心,31.1%是监狱中心。68.5%的参与者有过PRB经历,其中58.3%的病例超过6个月。31.5%的人表示他们没有经验,其中40%的人主要是由于PRB的偿还标准。关于处方/管理问题,专业人员报告说,与MTD和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(SL-BPN/NX)相比,PRB的满意度更高。根据卫生保健专业人员的说法,官僚主义,对一些开处方者缺乏了解,以及由于害怕阿片类药物戒断而患者拒绝是处方PRB的主要障碍。研究结果显示,医疗保健专业人员对PRB的满意度很高,将PRB定位为一种有价值的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adicciones
Adicciones SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信