Healthcare professionals' perception of prolonged-release buprenorphine in opioid use disorder. FOLIPRO Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rodrigo Oraá Gil, Diego Sucunza Guibert, María Yébenes Cortés, Miguel Ángel Casado Gómez, José Joaquín Antón Basanta, Francisco Pascual Pastor, Carlos Roncero
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' perception of prolonged-release buprenorphine in opioid use disorder. FOLIPRO Study.","authors":"Rodrigo Oraá Gil, Diego Sucunza Guibert, María Yébenes Cortés, Miguel Ángel Casado Gómez, José Joaquín Antón Basanta, Francisco Pascual Pastor, Carlos Roncero","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.2007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the FOLIPRO study was to determine the satisfaction and expectations of healthcare professionals with experience in opioid use disorders (OUD) with prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB). FOLIPRO was designed as an anonymous, cross-sectional, multicenter survey aimed at professionals from addiction centers (AC) and penitentiary centers in Spain. The survey collected characteristics of the AC and the healthcare professionals. Possible barriers associated with the prescription of PRB in OUD treatment were also identified. Seventy-four questionnaires were received from 45 different centers. More than half of the centers, 51.1%, were outpatient methadone (MTD) dispensing centers and 31.1% were penitentiary centers. 68.5% of the participants had experience with PRB, which exceeded 6 months in 58.3% of the cases. 31.5% stated that they had no experience, 40% of them mainly due to reimbursement criteria for PRB. Regarding prescribing/administration issues, professionals reported greater satisfaction with PRB compared to MTD and buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BPN/NX). According to healthcare professionals, bureaucracy, lack of knowledge of some prescribers, and patient refusal due to fear of opioid withdrawal were the main barriers described in for prescribing PRB. The results of the study show high satisfaction among healthcare professionals with PRB, positioning PRB as a valuable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":"37 1","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.2007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the FOLIPRO study was to determine the satisfaction and expectations of healthcare professionals with experience in opioid use disorders (OUD) with prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB). FOLIPRO was designed as an anonymous, cross-sectional, multicenter survey aimed at professionals from addiction centers (AC) and penitentiary centers in Spain. The survey collected characteristics of the AC and the healthcare professionals. Possible barriers associated with the prescription of PRB in OUD treatment were also identified. Seventy-four questionnaires were received from 45 different centers. More than half of the centers, 51.1%, were outpatient methadone (MTD) dispensing centers and 31.1% were penitentiary centers. 68.5% of the participants had experience with PRB, which exceeded 6 months in 58.3% of the cases. 31.5% stated that they had no experience, 40% of them mainly due to reimbursement criteria for PRB. Regarding prescribing/administration issues, professionals reported greater satisfaction with PRB compared to MTD and buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BPN/NX). According to healthcare professionals, bureaucracy, lack of knowledge of some prescribers, and patient refusal due to fear of opioid withdrawal were the main barriers described in for prescribing PRB. The results of the study show high satisfaction among healthcare professionals with PRB, positioning PRB as a valuable treatment option.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adicciones
Adicciones SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信