Rodrigo Oraá Gil, Diego Sucunza Guibert, María Yébenes Cortés, Miguel Ángel Casado Gómez, José Joaquín Antón Basanta, Francisco Pascual Pastor, Carlos Roncero
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' perception of prolonged-release buprenorphine in opioid use disorder. FOLIPRO Study.","authors":"Rodrigo Oraá Gil, Diego Sucunza Guibert, María Yébenes Cortés, Miguel Ángel Casado Gómez, José Joaquín Antón Basanta, Francisco Pascual Pastor, Carlos Roncero","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.2007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the FOLIPRO study was to determine the satisfaction and expectations of healthcare professionals with experience in opioid use disorders (OUD) with prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB). FOLIPRO was designed as an anonymous, cross-sectional, multicenter survey aimed at professionals from addiction centers (AC) and penitentiary centers in Spain. The survey collected characteristics of the AC and the healthcare professionals. Possible barriers associated with the prescription of PRB in OUD treatment were also identified. Seventy-four questionnaires were received from 45 different centers. More than half of the centers, 51.1%, were outpatient methadone (MTD) dispensing centers and 31.1% were penitentiary centers. 68.5% of the participants had experience with PRB, which exceeded 6 months in 58.3% of the cases. 31.5% stated that they had no experience, 40% of them mainly due to reimbursement criteria for PRB. Regarding prescribing/administration issues, professionals reported greater satisfaction with PRB compared to MTD and buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BPN/NX). According to healthcare professionals, bureaucracy, lack of knowledge of some prescribers, and patient refusal due to fear of opioid withdrawal were the main barriers described in for prescribing PRB. The results of the study show high satisfaction among healthcare professionals with PRB, positioning PRB as a valuable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":"37 1","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.2007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of the FOLIPRO study was to determine the satisfaction and expectations of healthcare professionals with experience in opioid use disorders (OUD) with prolonged-release buprenorphine (PRB). FOLIPRO was designed as an anonymous, cross-sectional, multicenter survey aimed at professionals from addiction centers (AC) and penitentiary centers in Spain. The survey collected characteristics of the AC and the healthcare professionals. Possible barriers associated with the prescription of PRB in OUD treatment were also identified. Seventy-four questionnaires were received from 45 different centers. More than half of the centers, 51.1%, were outpatient methadone (MTD) dispensing centers and 31.1% were penitentiary centers. 68.5% of the participants had experience with PRB, which exceeded 6 months in 58.3% of the cases. 31.5% stated that they had no experience, 40% of them mainly due to reimbursement criteria for PRB. Regarding prescribing/administration issues, professionals reported greater satisfaction with PRB compared to MTD and buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BPN/NX). According to healthcare professionals, bureaucracy, lack of knowledge of some prescribers, and patient refusal due to fear of opioid withdrawal were the main barriers described in for prescribing PRB. The results of the study show high satisfaction among healthcare professionals with PRB, positioning PRB as a valuable treatment option.
期刊介绍:
Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.