Medicaid and the Great Unwinding: The Administrative Presidency Meets Federalism.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michael K Gusmano, Frank J Thompson
{"title":"Medicaid and the Great Unwinding: The Administrative Presidency Meets Federalism.","authors":"Michael K Gusmano, Frank J Thompson","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11859429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of America's fragmented health insurance system, federal policymakers frequently turn to Medicaid to assist temporarily the \"blameless\" victims of societal crises. In this vein, the COVID pandemic triggered passage of major legislation that led Medicaid enrollments to soar. The end of the public health emergency presented the Biden administration and state Medicaid programs with the daunting task of implementing the \"great unwinding\" - redetermining eligibility for millions of enrollees. This article describes the core strategies the Biden administration employed to induce state implementing agents to minimize inappropriate Medicaid disenrollments during the unwinding. Preliminary data suggest great variation in state responses to the Biden strategic initiatives. On balance, however, the Biden administrative presidency appears to have made headway in nudging states toward more take-up friendly renewal processes. The implications of the great unwinding for more general efforts to enhance Medicaid participation rates receive attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11859429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of America's fragmented health insurance system, federal policymakers frequently turn to Medicaid to assist temporarily the "blameless" victims of societal crises. In this vein, the COVID pandemic triggered passage of major legislation that led Medicaid enrollments to soar. The end of the public health emergency presented the Biden administration and state Medicaid programs with the daunting task of implementing the "great unwinding" - redetermining eligibility for millions of enrollees. This article describes the core strategies the Biden administration employed to induce state implementing agents to minimize inappropriate Medicaid disenrollments during the unwinding. Preliminary data suggest great variation in state responses to the Biden strategic initiatives. On balance, however, the Biden administrative presidency appears to have made headway in nudging states toward more take-up friendly renewal processes. The implications of the great unwinding for more general efforts to enhance Medicaid participation rates receive attention.

医疗补助和大放松:行政总统制与联邦制。
在美国医疗保险体系支离破碎的背景下,联邦政策制定者经常求助于医疗补助计划,以暂时帮助那些在社会危机中“无可指责”的受害者。在这种情况下,COVID大流行引发了重大立法的通过,导致医疗补助计划的注册人数飙升。公共卫生危机的结束给拜登政府和州医疗补助计划提出了一项艰巨的任务,即实施“大放松”——重新确定数百万参保者的资格。本文描述了拜登政府采用的核心策略,以诱导国家执行机构在解除期间尽量减少不适当的医疗补助退出。初步数据显示,各州对拜登战略举措的反应存在很大差异。然而,总的来说,拜登政府似乎在推动各州走向更友好的更新进程方面取得了进展。大幅放松对提高医疗补助参与率的更普遍努力的影响受到了关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信