Daniel Blockmans, Sara K Penn, Arathi R Setty, Wolfgang A Schmidt, Andrea Rubbert-Roth, Ellen M Hauge, Helen I Keen, Tomonori Ishii, Nader Khalidi, Christian Dejaco, Maria C Cid, Bernhard Hellmich, Meng Liu, Weihan Zhao, Ivan Lagunes, Ana B Romero, Peter K Wung, Peter A Merkel
{"title":"A Phase 3 Trial of Upadacitinib for Giant-Cell Arteritis.","authors":"Daniel Blockmans, Sara K Penn, Arathi R Setty, Wolfgang A Schmidt, Andrea Rubbert-Roth, Ellen M Hauge, Helen I Keen, Tomonori Ishii, Nader Khalidi, Christian Dejaco, Maria C Cid, Bernhard Hellmich, Meng Liu, Weihan Zhao, Ivan Lagunes, Ana B Romero, Peter K Wung, Peter A Merkel","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2413449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Giant-cell arteritis is a systemic vasculitis with limited treatment options. The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib - a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that blocks the signaling of several cytokines, including interleukin-6 and interferon-γ - are unknown in patients with giant-cell arteritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned patients with new-onset or relapsing giant-cell arteritis, in a 2:1:1 ratio, to receive upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg or 7.5 mg orally once daily plus a 26-week glucocorticoid taper or placebo plus a 52-week glucocorticoid taper. The primary end point was sustained remission at week 52, defined by the absence of signs or symptoms of giant-cell arteritis from week 12 through week 52 and adherence to the protocol-specified glucocorticoid taper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 patients received upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg, 107 received upadacitinib at a dose of 7.5 mg, and 112 received placebo; 70% of the patients had new-onset giant-cell arteritis. Upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg showed superiority over placebo with respect to the primary end point (46.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 39.6 to 53.2] vs. 29.0% [95% CI, 20.6 to 37.5]; P = 0.002). Upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg was superior to placebo in the analysis of the hierarchically prespecified and multiplicity-controlled key secondary end points of sustained complete remission, time to a disease flare, cumulative glucocorticoid exposure, and patient-reported outcomes. Upadacitinib at a dose of 7.5 mg was not superior to placebo with respect to the primary end point (41.1% [95% CI, 31.8 to 50.4]). Safety outcomes during the treatment period of 52 weeks were similar in the upadacitinib and placebo groups. Although cardiovascular risk is a potential concern with a JAK inhibitor, no major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in the upadacitinib groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with giant-cell arteritis, upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg - but not 7.5 mg - with a 26-week glucocorticoid taper showed efficacy superior to that of placebo with a 52-week glucocorticoid taper. (Funded by AbbVie; SELECT-GCA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03725202.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2413449","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Giant-cell arteritis is a systemic vasculitis with limited treatment options. The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib - a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that blocks the signaling of several cytokines, including interleukin-6 and interferon-γ - are unknown in patients with giant-cell arteritis.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients with new-onset or relapsing giant-cell arteritis, in a 2:1:1 ratio, to receive upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg or 7.5 mg orally once daily plus a 26-week glucocorticoid taper or placebo plus a 52-week glucocorticoid taper. The primary end point was sustained remission at week 52, defined by the absence of signs or symptoms of giant-cell arteritis from week 12 through week 52 and adherence to the protocol-specified glucocorticoid taper.
Results: A total of 209 patients received upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg, 107 received upadacitinib at a dose of 7.5 mg, and 112 received placebo; 70% of the patients had new-onset giant-cell arteritis. Upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg showed superiority over placebo with respect to the primary end point (46.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 39.6 to 53.2] vs. 29.0% [95% CI, 20.6 to 37.5]; P = 0.002). Upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg was superior to placebo in the analysis of the hierarchically prespecified and multiplicity-controlled key secondary end points of sustained complete remission, time to a disease flare, cumulative glucocorticoid exposure, and patient-reported outcomes. Upadacitinib at a dose of 7.5 mg was not superior to placebo with respect to the primary end point (41.1% [95% CI, 31.8 to 50.4]). Safety outcomes during the treatment period of 52 weeks were similar in the upadacitinib and placebo groups. Although cardiovascular risk is a potential concern with a JAK inhibitor, no major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in the upadacitinib groups.
Conclusions: In patients with giant-cell arteritis, upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg - but not 7.5 mg - with a 26-week glucocorticoid taper showed efficacy superior to that of placebo with a 52-week glucocorticoid taper. (Funded by AbbVie; SELECT-GCA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03725202.).
期刊介绍:
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.