Bo Bi, Tiana Gurney, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan
{"title":"Adult obesity management in Australia: How can we bridge the gap between guidelines and current general practice?","authors":"Bo Bi, Tiana Gurney, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Obesity is still recognised as a risk factor rather than a chronic disease in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) have reported a lack of confidence and support in the management of obesity. In this study, we explored GPs' current definitions and treatment of obesity and their attitudes towards proposed clinician educational and billing strategies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to GPs across Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 GPs who completed the survey, 82% defined obesity, with and/or without comorbidities, as a chronic disease. There is a significant gap between current practice and clinical guidelines, particularly in screening and prevention. The overall attitude towards proposed solutions was very positive. Descriptive analysis was used to present the characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Australia's outdated definition of obesity likely hinders management and contributes to the observed gap between clinical guidelines and current practice. Clinician education on behaviour change and long-term weight management, funding for more enhanced primary care referrals and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pharmacotherapy for weight loss might be possible solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 4","pages":"171-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Obesity is still recognised as a risk factor rather than a chronic disease in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) have reported a lack of confidence and support in the management of obesity. In this study, we explored GPs' current definitions and treatment of obesity and their attitudes towards proposed clinician educational and billing strategies.
Method: In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to GPs across Australia.
Results: Of the 189 GPs who completed the survey, 82% defined obesity, with and/or without comorbidities, as a chronic disease. There is a significant gap between current practice and clinical guidelines, particularly in screening and prevention. The overall attitude towards proposed solutions was very positive. Descriptive analysis was used to present the characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables.
Discussion: Australia's outdated definition of obesity likely hinders management and contributes to the observed gap between clinical guidelines and current practice. Clinician education on behaviour change and long-term weight management, funding for more enhanced primary care referrals and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pharmacotherapy for weight loss might be possible solutions.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.