Adult obesity management in Australia: How can we bridge the gap between guidelines and current general practice?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bo Bi, Tiana Gurney, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan
{"title":"Adult obesity management in Australia: How can we bridge the gap between guidelines and current general practice?","authors":"Bo Bi, Tiana Gurney, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Obesity is still recognised as a risk factor rather than a chronic disease in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) have reported a lack of confidence and support in the management of obesity. In this study, we explored GPs' current definitions and treatment of obesity and their attitudes towards proposed clinician educational and billing strategies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to GPs across Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 GPs who completed the survey, 82% defined obesity, with and/or without comorbidities, as a chronic disease. There is a significant gap between current practice and clinical guidelines, particularly in screening and prevention. The overall attitude towards proposed solutions was very positive. Descriptive analysis was used to present the characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Australia's outdated definition of obesity likely hinders management and contributes to the observed gap between clinical guidelines and current practice. Clinician education on behaviour change and long-term weight management, funding for more enhanced primary care referrals and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pharmacotherapy for weight loss might be possible solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 4","pages":"171-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-07-23-6903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Obesity is still recognised as a risk factor rather than a chronic disease in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) have reported a lack of confidence and support in the management of obesity. In this study, we explored GPs' current definitions and treatment of obesity and their attitudes towards proposed clinician educational and billing strategies.

Method: In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to GPs across Australia.

Results: Of the 189 GPs who completed the survey, 82% defined obesity, with and/or without comorbidities, as a chronic disease. There is a significant gap between current practice and clinical guidelines, particularly in screening and prevention. The overall attitude towards proposed solutions was very positive. Descriptive analysis was used to present the characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables.

Discussion: Australia's outdated definition of obesity likely hinders management and contributes to the observed gap between clinical guidelines and current practice. Clinician education on behaviour change and long-term weight management, funding for more enhanced primary care referrals and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pharmacotherapy for weight loss might be possible solutions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信