Sporadic use of classic psychedelics and neuropsychological performance: A cross-sectional analysis

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Simon Reiche , Tim Hirschfeld , Anna Lena Gröticke , Marie Traub , Nicklas Jakob Hafiz , Rico Haas , Lara Sedlaczek , Linda Ortlieb , Georg Leistenschneider , Lukas A. Basedow , Andrea Lohse , Felix Bermpohl , Thomas Günther Riemer , Tomislav Majić
{"title":"Sporadic use of classic psychedelics and neuropsychological performance: A cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Simon Reiche ,&nbsp;Tim Hirschfeld ,&nbsp;Anna Lena Gröticke ,&nbsp;Marie Traub ,&nbsp;Nicklas Jakob Hafiz ,&nbsp;Rico Haas ,&nbsp;Lara Sedlaczek ,&nbsp;Linda Ortlieb ,&nbsp;Georg Leistenschneider ,&nbsp;Lukas A. Basedow ,&nbsp;Andrea Lohse ,&nbsp;Felix Bermpohl ,&nbsp;Thomas Günther Riemer ,&nbsp;Tomislav Majić","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence on the neuropsychological consequences of classic psychedelics like psilocybin, LSD, and ayahuasca is conflicting, and little is known about how sporadic use of psychedelics under naturalistic conditions may affect cognitive functioning. Given the growing interest in the therapeutic potential of psychedelics and the rise in non-medical use, further exploration into their neuropsychological effects is needed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional, exploratory study employed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to assess cognitive domains such as executive function, memory, attention, and visuospatial abilities among individuals with mild to moderate lifetime use of psychedelics. Analyses compared all users to non-users, moderate users to matched controls, and adjusted dose-response analyses were conducted within the users group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2611 screened individuals, <em>N</em> = 136 participants (84 psychedelic users and 52 controls) were included. Participants were aged 18–50 years. Neuropsychological performance was broadly equivalent between users and controls. However, matched-pair analyses showed that psychedelic users had a modest advantage in executive functions, especially superior performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) (<em>p</em> &lt; .05). Dose-response analyses further corroborated these findings, indicating a positive association between lifetime psychedelic use and performance on the WCST, specifically total errors (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), perseverative responses (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), perseverative errors (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), non-perseverative errors (<em>p</em> = .008), and conceptual level responses (<em>p</em> = .004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study did not detect any negative associations between sporadic lifetime psychedelic use and cognition. Instead, a moderate association with executive functioning was found, indicating increased cognitive flexibility in users. Dose-response analyses further supported this relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 111353"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584625001071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Evidence on the neuropsychological consequences of classic psychedelics like psilocybin, LSD, and ayahuasca is conflicting, and little is known about how sporadic use of psychedelics under naturalistic conditions may affect cognitive functioning. Given the growing interest in the therapeutic potential of psychedelics and the rise in non-medical use, further exploration into their neuropsychological effects is needed.

Methods

This cross-sectional, exploratory study employed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to assess cognitive domains such as executive function, memory, attention, and visuospatial abilities among individuals with mild to moderate lifetime use of psychedelics. Analyses compared all users to non-users, moderate users to matched controls, and adjusted dose-response analyses were conducted within the users group.

Results

From 2611 screened individuals, N = 136 participants (84 psychedelic users and 52 controls) were included. Participants were aged 18–50 years. Neuropsychological performance was broadly equivalent between users and controls. However, matched-pair analyses showed that psychedelic users had a modest advantage in executive functions, especially superior performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) (p < .05). Dose-response analyses further corroborated these findings, indicating a positive association between lifetime psychedelic use and performance on the WCST, specifically total errors (p < .001), perseverative responses (p < .001), perseverative errors (p < .001), non-perseverative errors (p = .008), and conceptual level responses (p = .004).

Conclusions

The study did not detect any negative associations between sporadic lifetime psychedelic use and cognition. Instead, a moderate association with executive functioning was found, indicating increased cognitive flexibility in users. Dose-response analyses further supported this relationship.
偶尔使用经典迷幻药和神经心理学表现:横断面分析。
背景:关于经典迷幻药如裸盖菇素、LSD和死藤水的神经心理学后果的证据是相互矛盾的,并且很少有人知道在自然条件下偶尔使用迷幻药会如何影响认知功能。鉴于对致幻剂治疗潜力的兴趣日益增长和非医疗用途的增加,需要进一步探索其神经心理作用。方法:本横断面探索性研究采用综合神经心理学测试来评估轻度至中度致幻剂终生使用个体的认知领域,如执行功能、记忆、注意力和视觉空间能力。分析比较了所有使用者与非使用者,中度使用者与匹配对照,并在使用者组内进行了调整剂量-反应分析。结果:从2611名筛选个体中,N = 包括136名参与者(84名迷幻药使用者和52名对照组)。参与者年龄在18-50岁 岁。使用者和控制组的神经心理学表现大致相当。然而,配对分析显示,致幻剂使用者在执行功能上有一定的优势,特别是在威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)上的表现更优(p )。结论:本研究没有发现零星的终身致幻剂使用与认知之间存在任何负相关。相反,它与执行功能有适度的联系,表明使用者的认知灵活性增加了。剂量-反应分析进一步支持了这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信