Muscle Strengthening Exercises for the Foot and Ankle: A Scoping Review Exploring Adherence to Best Practice for Optimizing Musculoskeletal Health.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
John W A Osborne, Hylton B Menz, Glen A Whittaker, Matthew Cotchett, Karl B Landorf
{"title":"Muscle Strengthening Exercises for the Foot and Ankle: A Scoping Review Exploring Adherence to Best Practice for Optimizing Musculoskeletal Health.","authors":"John W A Osborne, Hylton B Menz, Glen A Whittaker, Matthew Cotchett, Karl B Landorf","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Foot and ankle muscle strengthening exercises are common interventions for many musculoskeletal conditions that are associated with pain and limited function in the lower limb. The scientific literature has a multitude of strengthening exercises recommended, and they have been criticized for not adhering to best practice and for being poorly reported. The aims of this scoping review were to (i) describe what foot and ankle strengthening exercises have been recommended in the scientific literature, (ii) compare the prescription of these exercises to best practice recommendations, and (iii) assess the completeness of the reporting of these exercises and exercise programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search of peer-review journal articles was conducted on 23 February 2023. Study designs that were included were experimental, quasi-experimental, feasibility, pilot studies, and observational. For each study included in the review, study design and participant details such as age, sex, and conditions treated were noted. To describe the foot and ankle strengthening exercises, each exercise was noted, which included its name, the number of sets and repetitions recommended, the load type and its magnitude, and whether there were any progression strategies. Exercises were grouped according to primary movement and a general exercise descriptor. To compare to best practice, each program's prescription parameters of frequency, intensity, and time were compared to the American College of Sports Medicine's (ACSM) guidelines. To assess completeness of reporting, each study was assessed with the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1511 documents, and 87 were included after full-text screening. Of the included studies, most were randomized controlled trials, and the most common participants were healthy adults (mean age range: 18-83 years). Across all studies, a total of 300 foot and ankle exercises were prescribed. The most common strengthening exercise category involved ankle plantar flexion (25% of 300 exercises), followed by plantar foot intrinsics (16%). The most common prescription of strengthening exercises included 3 sets (37%) of 10 repetitions (38%) performed 3 times per week (34%), often without a prescribed load (66%). Prescribed sets per muscle group met ACSM recommendations for novice lifters in 93% of studies. In contrast, load intensity (for increasing muscle strength) was prescribed at the recommended dose of 60% of 1 repetition maximum or greater in only 2% of exercises. The median score for completeness of reporting according to the CERT checklist was 31% of all items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review found that the studies predominantly included ankle plantar flexion and plantar foot intrinsic muscle strengthening exercises, typically prescribed at 3 sets of 10 repetitions, 3 times per week. When compared to best practice recommendations, load intensity in exercise prescription is commonly less than recommended or is not reported. In addition, the review highlights deficiencies in the reporting of exercise programs. We propose using established best-practice exercise prescription guidelines like those from the ACSM and the adoption of CERT for reporting exercises in the scientific literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"e70040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Foot and ankle muscle strengthening exercises are common interventions for many musculoskeletal conditions that are associated with pain and limited function in the lower limb. The scientific literature has a multitude of strengthening exercises recommended, and they have been criticized for not adhering to best practice and for being poorly reported. The aims of this scoping review were to (i) describe what foot and ankle strengthening exercises have been recommended in the scientific literature, (ii) compare the prescription of these exercises to best practice recommendations, and (iii) assess the completeness of the reporting of these exercises and exercise programs.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search of peer-review journal articles was conducted on 23 February 2023. Study designs that were included were experimental, quasi-experimental, feasibility, pilot studies, and observational. For each study included in the review, study design and participant details such as age, sex, and conditions treated were noted. To describe the foot and ankle strengthening exercises, each exercise was noted, which included its name, the number of sets and repetitions recommended, the load type and its magnitude, and whether there were any progression strategies. Exercises were grouped according to primary movement and a general exercise descriptor. To compare to best practice, each program's prescription parameters of frequency, intensity, and time were compared to the American College of Sports Medicine's (ACSM) guidelines. To assess completeness of reporting, each study was assessed with the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT).

Results: The search yielded 1511 documents, and 87 were included after full-text screening. Of the included studies, most were randomized controlled trials, and the most common participants were healthy adults (mean age range: 18-83 years). Across all studies, a total of 300 foot and ankle exercises were prescribed. The most common strengthening exercise category involved ankle plantar flexion (25% of 300 exercises), followed by plantar foot intrinsics (16%). The most common prescription of strengthening exercises included 3 sets (37%) of 10 repetitions (38%) performed 3 times per week (34%), often without a prescribed load (66%). Prescribed sets per muscle group met ACSM recommendations for novice lifters in 93% of studies. In contrast, load intensity (for increasing muscle strength) was prescribed at the recommended dose of 60% of 1 repetition maximum or greater in only 2% of exercises. The median score for completeness of reporting according to the CERT checklist was 31% of all items.

Conclusions: This scoping review found that the studies predominantly included ankle plantar flexion and plantar foot intrinsic muscle strengthening exercises, typically prescribed at 3 sets of 10 repetitions, 3 times per week. When compared to best practice recommendations, load intensity in exercise prescription is commonly less than recommended or is not reported. In addition, the review highlights deficiencies in the reporting of exercise programs. We propose using established best-practice exercise prescription guidelines like those from the ACSM and the adoption of CERT for reporting exercises in the scientific literature.

足部和踝关节的肌肉强化练习:对优化肌肉骨骼健康的最佳实践坚持的范围审查。
背景:足部和踝关节肌肉强化训练是许多与下肢疼痛和功能受限相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的常见干预措施。科学文献中推荐了大量的强化锻炼,这些锻炼被批评为没有遵循最佳实践,而且报道不充分。本综述的目的是(1)描述科学文献中推荐的足部和踝关节强化运动,(2)将这些运动的处方与最佳实践建议进行比较,(3)评估这些运动和运动项目报告的完整性。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围审查方法进行范围审查。我们于2023年2月23日对同行评议期刊文章进行了系统检索。纳入的研究设计包括实验性、准实验性、可行性、试点研究和观察性研究。对于纳入综述的每一项研究,研究设计和参与者的详细信息,如年龄、性别和治疗条件都被记录下来。为了描述足部和脚踝的强化练习,每项练习都被记录下来,包括它的名称、建议的组数和重复次数、负荷类型和强度,以及是否有任何进展策略。根据主要运动和一般运动描述符对运动进行分组。为了与最佳实践进行比较,将每个项目的处方参数(频率、强度和时间)与美国运动医学学院(ACSM)的指导方针进行比较。为了评估报告的完整性,每个研究都用运动报告模板共识(CERT)进行评估。结果:共检索文献1511篇,经全文筛选纳入文献87篇。在纳入的研究中,大多数是随机对照试验,最常见的参与者是健康成年人(平均年龄范围:18-83岁)。在所有研究中,总共规定了300项足部和脚踝运动。最常见的强化运动包括踝关节的足底屈曲(占300项运动的25%),其次是足底的内在运动(16%)。最常见的强化运动处方包括3组(37%)10次重复(38%)每周进行3次(34%),通常没有规定的负荷(66%)。在93%的研究中,每个肌肉群的规定组数符合ACSM对新手举重运动员的建议。相比之下,负荷强度(为了增加肌肉力量)的推荐剂量为1次最大重复的60%或更大,只有2%的运动。根据CERT核对表报告的完整性的中位数分数为所有项目的31%。结论:本综述发现,研究主要包括踝关节足底屈曲和足底内在肌肉强化练习,通常规定为3组,每组10次重复,每周3次。与最佳实践建议相比,运动处方中的负荷强度通常低于建议或未报道。此外,报告还强调了运动项目报告的不足。我们建议使用已建立的最佳实践运动处方指南,如来自ACSM的指南,并在科学文献中采用CERT报告运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信