7 Tesla magnetic resonance spectroscopy estimates of GABA concentration relate to physiological measures of tonic inhibition in the human motor cortex.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Ilenia Paparella, Paolo Cardone, Benedetta Zanichelli, Laurent Lamalle, Fabienne Collette, Siya Sherif, Mikhail Zubkov, William T Clarke, Charlotte J Stagg, Pierre Maquet, Gilles Vandewalle
{"title":"7 Tesla magnetic resonance spectroscopy estimates of GABA concentration relate to physiological measures of tonic inhibition in the human motor cortex.","authors":"Ilenia Paparella, Paolo Cardone, Benedetta Zanichelli, Laurent Lamalle, Fabienne Collette, Siya Sherif, Mikhail Zubkov, William T Clarke, Charlotte J Stagg, Pierre Maquet, Gilles Vandewalle","doi":"10.1113/JP287311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>GABAergic neurotransmission within the cortex plays a key role in learning and is altered in several brain diseases. Quantification of bulk GABA in the human brain is typically obtained by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). However, the interpretation of MRS-GABA is still debated. A recent mathematical simulation contends that MRS detects extrasynaptic GABA, mediating tonic inhibition. Nevertheless, no empirical data have yet confirmed this hypothesis. Here we collected ultra-high-field 7 Tesla MRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with high-density electroencephalography (TMS-hdEEG) from the motor cortex of 20 healthy participants (age 23.95 ± 6.4 years), while they were at rest. We first applied a neural mass model (NMM) to TMS-evoked potentials to disentangle the contribution of different GABAergic pools. We then assessed to which of these different pools MRS-GABA was related to by means of parametric empirical Bayesian (PEB) analysis. We found that MRS-GABA was mostly positively related to the NMM-derived measures of tonic inhibition and overall functionality of the GABAergic synapse. This relationship was reliable enough to predict MRS-GABA from NMM-GABA. These findings clarify the mesoscopic underpinnings of GABA levels measured by MRS. Our work will help fulfil the promises of MRS-GABA, enhancing our understanding of human behaviour, brain physiology and pathophysiology. KEY POINTS: GABA neurotransmission is essential for synaptic plasticity and learning (especially motor learning) and is altered in several brain disorders, such as epilepsy and stroke. Quantification of GABA in the human brain is typically obtained by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). However, the interpretation of MRS-GABA is still debated. By using a biophysical neural mass model, here we show that MRS-GABA relates to physiological measures of tonic inhibition in the human cortex.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

GABAergic neurotransmission within the cortex plays a key role in learning and is altered in several brain diseases. Quantification of bulk GABA in the human brain is typically obtained by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). However, the interpretation of MRS-GABA is still debated. A recent mathematical simulation contends that MRS detects extrasynaptic GABA, mediating tonic inhibition. Nevertheless, no empirical data have yet confirmed this hypothesis. Here we collected ultra-high-field 7 Tesla MRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with high-density electroencephalography (TMS-hdEEG) from the motor cortex of 20 healthy participants (age 23.95 ± 6.4 years), while they were at rest. We first applied a neural mass model (NMM) to TMS-evoked potentials to disentangle the contribution of different GABAergic pools. We then assessed to which of these different pools MRS-GABA was related to by means of parametric empirical Bayesian (PEB) analysis. We found that MRS-GABA was mostly positively related to the NMM-derived measures of tonic inhibition and overall functionality of the GABAergic synapse. This relationship was reliable enough to predict MRS-GABA from NMM-GABA. These findings clarify the mesoscopic underpinnings of GABA levels measured by MRS. Our work will help fulfil the promises of MRS-GABA, enhancing our understanding of human behaviour, brain physiology and pathophysiology. KEY POINTS: GABA neurotransmission is essential for synaptic plasticity and learning (especially motor learning) and is altered in several brain disorders, such as epilepsy and stroke. Quantification of GABA in the human brain is typically obtained by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). However, the interpretation of MRS-GABA is still debated. By using a biophysical neural mass model, here we show that MRS-GABA relates to physiological measures of tonic inhibition in the human cortex.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信