The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prescribing Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in the Mid-Michigan Region.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Nooshin C Beygui, Erin Duross, Chin-I Cheng, Katherine Mesaros, Karissa Gawronski, Juliette Perzhinsky
{"title":"The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prescribing Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in the Mid-Michigan Region.","authors":"Nooshin C Beygui, Erin Duross, Chin-I Cheng, Katherine Mesaros, Karissa Gawronski, Juliette Perzhinsky","doi":"10.1177/21501319251331322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing prevalence of opioid use coupled with the emergence of the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted opioid overdoses and death rates. People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are particularly vulnerable to the pandemic's consequences. Although Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) are the most well supported treatment for OUD, they remain underutilized by clinicians, particularly in the primary care setting, emphasizing the importance of examining factors that impact prescribing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess clinicians' prescribing practices for MOUD and assess the pandemic's effect on MOUD prescription. To determine whether there is an association between patient-specific factors, such as mental health diagnoses and substance use disorder (SUD), and MOUD prescription practices prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review assessed 500 patient charts with a diagnosis of OUD to assess demographics, MOUD prescribing, substance use, and co-morbid mental health conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>312 charts met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the percentage of new MOUD prescriptions among the selected cohort between the 2 selected timeframes, nor was there a significant difference in the prescriber/setting of new prescriptions. Cumulative analysis revealed that greater than 2/3 of the selected patients had concurrent mental health diagnoses. Greater than 50% of patients reported active non-opioid substance use. The odds of having a co-occurring SUD were significantly higher among patients treated in the emergency department and various treatment settings-including urgent care and non-primary care clinics-as compared to the primary care outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strong evidence supports the efficacy of using MOUD in primary care, yet it is underutilized in the mid-Michigan region. Overall prevalence of mental health diagnoses, SUD, MOUD prescriber practices were similar prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a high occurrence of co-occurring SUD especially among patients treated outside of the primary care setting. Future initiatives to increase clinician education around MOUD and address patient barriers to treatment are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251331322"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251331322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of opioid use coupled with the emergence of the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted opioid overdoses and death rates. People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are particularly vulnerable to the pandemic's consequences. Although Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) are the most well supported treatment for OUD, they remain underutilized by clinicians, particularly in the primary care setting, emphasizing the importance of examining factors that impact prescribing.

Objective: To assess clinicians' prescribing practices for MOUD and assess the pandemic's effect on MOUD prescription. To determine whether there is an association between patient-specific factors, such as mental health diagnoses and substance use disorder (SUD), and MOUD prescription practices prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A retrospective chart review assessed 500 patient charts with a diagnosis of OUD to assess demographics, MOUD prescribing, substance use, and co-morbid mental health conditions.

Results: 312 charts met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the percentage of new MOUD prescriptions among the selected cohort between the 2 selected timeframes, nor was there a significant difference in the prescriber/setting of new prescriptions. Cumulative analysis revealed that greater than 2/3 of the selected patients had concurrent mental health diagnoses. Greater than 50% of patients reported active non-opioid substance use. The odds of having a co-occurring SUD were significantly higher among patients treated in the emergency department and various treatment settings-including urgent care and non-primary care clinics-as compared to the primary care outpatient setting.

Conclusions: Strong evidence supports the efficacy of using MOUD in primary care, yet it is underutilized in the mid-Michigan region. Overall prevalence of mental health diagnoses, SUD, MOUD prescriber practices were similar prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a high occurrence of co-occurring SUD especially among patients treated outside of the primary care setting. Future initiatives to increase clinician education around MOUD and address patient barriers to treatment are warranted.

COVID-19大流行对密歇根州中部地区阿片类药物使用障碍处方的影响
背景:阿片类药物使用的日益普遍,加上冠状病毒病-19 (COVID-19)大流行的出现,影响了阿片类药物的过量使用和死亡率。阿片类药物使用障碍患者特别容易受到大流行后果的影响。尽管阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的药物治疗是最受支持的OUD治疗方法,但临床医生仍未充分利用它们,特别是在初级保健环境中,这强调了检查影响处方因素的重要性。目的:评估临床医生对mod的处方做法,并评估大流行对mod处方的影响。确定患者特定因素(如精神健康诊断和物质使用障碍(SUD))与COVID-19大流行之前和期间的mod处方实践之间是否存在关联。方法:回顾性分析500例诊断为OUD的患者图表,以评估人口统计学、OUD处方、物质使用和共病精神健康状况。结果:312例符合纳入标准。在两个选定的时间段内,所选队列的新mod处方百分比无显著差异,新处方的开处方者/设置也无显著差异。累积分析显示,超过2/3的入选患者同时有心理健康诊断。超过50%的患者报告了活跃的非阿片类药物使用。与初级保健门诊相比,在急诊科和各种治疗场所(包括紧急护理和非初级保健诊所)接受治疗的患者同时发生SUD的几率明显更高。结论:强有力的证据支持在初级保健中使用mod的有效性,但它在密歇根中部地区未得到充分利用。在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,精神健康诊断、SUD和mod处方实践的总体患病率相似。并发性SUD的发生率很高,特别是在非初级保健机构治疗的患者中。未来有必要加强临床医生对mod的教育,并解决患者的治疗障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信