Validation of a Pulsatile Model for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: NEFPAR Model.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jose Antonio Campos Sañudo, Saul Higuera Pardo, Roberto Ballestero Diego
{"title":"Validation of a Pulsatile Model for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: NEFPAR Model.","authors":"Jose Antonio Campos Sañudo, Saul Higuera Pardo, Roberto Ballestero Diego","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy are the gold standard for treating small renal tumors. To improve training while adhering to animal welfare regulations, the NEFPAR pulsatile model was developed as a nonliving alternative for surgical simulation. This study aimed to validate NEFPAR as a realistic and effective training tool. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The NEFPAR model was constructed using porcine tissue used in other simulations, a pulsatile pump, and standard laparoscopic instruments. Eleven participants (4 urologists and 7 urology residents) were recruited for validation. They performed simulated laparoscopic partial nephrectomies using the model, and their performance was evaluated through a survey assessing the realism, educational impact, and comparison to other simulation models. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, with significance set at <i>P</i> < .05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most participants (72.7%) rated the NEFPAR model as realistic for key procedural steps, such as tumor resection and renal hilum dissection. The bleeding component was deemed essential for learning by 100% of participants. The NEFPAR model was superior to nonpulsatile animal models in replicating surgical bleeding and was comparable to cadaveric models in external appearance and tissue texture. However, cadaveric models were rated higher for replicating all procedural steps. No significant differences in responses were found between urologists and residents. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The NEFPAR model effectively simulates key aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and offers an ethical, cost-effective alternative for surgical training. It was well-received for its educational value, especially for simulating surgical bleeding. Further refinements could enhance tissue consistency and tumor positioning, but the model has strong potential to be integrated into urology training programs to improve surgical skills and reduce reliance on animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy are the gold standard for treating small renal tumors. To improve training while adhering to animal welfare regulations, the NEFPAR pulsatile model was developed as a nonliving alternative for surgical simulation. This study aimed to validate NEFPAR as a realistic and effective training tool. Methods: The NEFPAR model was constructed using porcine tissue used in other simulations, a pulsatile pump, and standard laparoscopic instruments. Eleven participants (4 urologists and 7 urology residents) were recruited for validation. They performed simulated laparoscopic partial nephrectomies using the model, and their performance was evaluated through a survey assessing the realism, educational impact, and comparison to other simulation models. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, with significance set at P < .05. Results: Most participants (72.7%) rated the NEFPAR model as realistic for key procedural steps, such as tumor resection and renal hilum dissection. The bleeding component was deemed essential for learning by 100% of participants. The NEFPAR model was superior to nonpulsatile animal models in replicating surgical bleeding and was comparable to cadaveric models in external appearance and tissue texture. However, cadaveric models were rated higher for replicating all procedural steps. No significant differences in responses were found between urologists and residents. Conclusions: The NEFPAR model effectively simulates key aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and offers an ethical, cost-effective alternative for surgical training. It was well-received for its educational value, especially for simulating surgical bleeding. Further refinements could enhance tissue consistency and tumor positioning, but the model has strong potential to be integrated into urology training programs to improve surgical skills and reduce reliance on animal models.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信