Validation of a Pulsatile Model for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: NEFPAR Model.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jose Antonio Campos Sañudo, Saul Higuera Pardo, Roberto Ballestero Diego
{"title":"Validation of a Pulsatile Model for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: NEFPAR Model.","authors":"Jose Antonio Campos Sañudo, Saul Higuera Pardo, Roberto Ballestero Diego","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy are the gold standard for treating small renal tumors. To improve training while adhering to animal welfare regulations, the NEFPAR pulsatile model was developed as a nonliving alternative for surgical simulation. This study aimed to validate NEFPAR as a realistic and effective training tool. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The NEFPAR model was constructed using porcine tissue used in other simulations, a pulsatile pump, and standard laparoscopic instruments. Eleven participants (4 urologists and 7 urology residents) were recruited for validation. They performed simulated laparoscopic partial nephrectomies using the model, and their performance was evaluated through a survey assessing the realism, educational impact, and comparison to other simulation models. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, with significance set at <i>P</i> < .05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most participants (72.7%) rated the NEFPAR model as realistic for key procedural steps, such as tumor resection and renal hilum dissection. The bleeding component was deemed essential for learning by 100% of participants. The NEFPAR model was superior to nonpulsatile animal models in replicating surgical bleeding and was comparable to cadaveric models in external appearance and tissue texture. However, cadaveric models were rated higher for replicating all procedural steps. No significant differences in responses were found between urologists and residents. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The NEFPAR model effectively simulates key aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and offers an ethical, cost-effective alternative for surgical training. It was well-received for its educational value, especially for simulating surgical bleeding. Further refinements could enhance tissue consistency and tumor positioning, but the model has strong potential to be integrated into urology training programs to improve surgical skills and reduce reliance on animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"401-405"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy are the gold standard for treating small renal tumors. To improve training while adhering to animal welfare regulations, the NEFPAR pulsatile model was developed as a nonliving alternative for surgical simulation. This study aimed to validate NEFPAR as a realistic and effective training tool. Methods: The NEFPAR model was constructed using porcine tissue used in other simulations, a pulsatile pump, and standard laparoscopic instruments. Eleven participants (4 urologists and 7 urology residents) were recruited for validation. They performed simulated laparoscopic partial nephrectomies using the model, and their performance was evaluated through a survey assessing the realism, educational impact, and comparison to other simulation models. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, with significance set at P < .05. Results: Most participants (72.7%) rated the NEFPAR model as realistic for key procedural steps, such as tumor resection and renal hilum dissection. The bleeding component was deemed essential for learning by 100% of participants. The NEFPAR model was superior to nonpulsatile animal models in replicating surgical bleeding and was comparable to cadaveric models in external appearance and tissue texture. However, cadaveric models were rated higher for replicating all procedural steps. No significant differences in responses were found between urologists and residents. Conclusions: The NEFPAR model effectively simulates key aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and offers an ethical, cost-effective alternative for surgical training. It was well-received for its educational value, especially for simulating surgical bleeding. Further refinements could enhance tissue consistency and tumor positioning, but the model has strong potential to be integrated into urology training programs to improve surgical skills and reduce reliance on animal models.

腹腔镜肾部分切除术搏动模型的验证:NEFPAR模型。
背景:腹腔镜和机器人辅助部分肾切除术是治疗小肾肿瘤的金标准。为了在遵守动物福利法规的同时改善训练,NEFPAR脉冲模型被开发为非活体手术模拟的替代方案。本研究旨在验证NEFPAR作为一种现实有效的培训工具。方法:采用其他模拟用的猪组织、脉冲泵和标准腹腔镜器械构建NEFPAR模型。11名参与者(4名泌尿科医师和7名泌尿科住院医师)被招募进行验证。他们使用该模型进行了模拟腹腔镜部分肾切除术,并通过一项评估真实感、教育影响以及与其他模拟模型比较的调查来评估他们的表现。数据分析采用Fisher精确检验,显著性P < 0.05。结果:大多数参与者(72.7%)认为NEFPAR模型对于关键手术步骤(如肿瘤切除和肾门清扫)是真实的。100%的参与者认为出血部分对学习至关重要。NEFPAR模型在复制手术出血方面优于无搏动动物模型,在外观和组织质地方面与尸体模型相当。然而,尸体模型在复制所有程序步骤方面的评分更高。泌尿科医生和住院医师的反应无显著差异。结论:NEFPAR模型有效地模拟了腹腔镜部分肾切除术的关键方面,并为手术培训提供了一种道德、经济的替代方案。由于其教育价值,特别是模拟手术出血,受到了广泛的欢迎。进一步的改进可以增强组织一致性和肿瘤定位,但该模型具有很强的潜力,可以整合到泌尿外科培训计划中,以提高手术技能,减少对动物模型的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信