Vestibular contribution to motor output is also suppressed by voluntary action of the arm

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Angelo Bartsch-Jiménez, Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
{"title":"Vestibular contribution to motor output is also suppressed by voluntary action of the arm","authors":"Angelo Bartsch-Jiménez,&nbsp;Francisco J Valero-Cuevas","doi":"10.1113/JP287077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>The vestibular sensory system is among the oldest and most fundamental contributors to motor behaviour as it is critical to maintaining posture and balance. However such low-level motor responses could interfere with cortically mediated voluntary behaviour that naturally involves posture and balance. Consequently, it has been proposed that – much like the inhibition of reflex responses – vestibular contributions to motor output are ‘gated’ (dubbed <i>vestibular suppression</i>) to avoid undesirable self-perturbations during voluntary head movements. Here we demonstrate that such suppression also occurs for unperturbed voluntary arm function. Our evidence comes from comparing coherence at baseline (No Stimulation) and after Sham and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS). Specifically neck muscles showed shared neural drive (intermuscular coherence [IMC]), which increased with GVS – but not Sham – at <i>Rest</i>. This GVS-mediated increased coherence in neck muscles, however, was suppressed during voluntary isometric contractions and reaching movements of the arm on the same side as the GVS was applied. No changes were found in pairwise IMC during Sham (compared with No stimulation) or in arm muscles either at rest or during voluntary movement during GVS in neurotypical adults. In addition to extending vestibular suppression to unperturbed voluntary arm function, these results provide support for the common (yet unproven to our knowledge) notion that arm muscles do not receive vestibular neural drive during unperturbed voluntary movement. Moreover, these results shed light on the mechanisms that mediate competing descending outputs for voluntary function and serve as a baseline against which to compare potential task-dependent dysregulation of vestibular-mediated output to the neck and arms in stroke and neurological conditions.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The vestibular system is critical for correcting perturbations during voluntary movement.</li>\n \n <li>During voluntary head movements, vestibular suppression occurs to avoid undesirable self-perturbations.</li>\n \n <li>However, the contribution of the vestibular system to unperturbed voluntary arm movement remains unclear.</li>\n \n <li>We used intermuscular coherence (IMC) to measure vestibulospinal drive to neck and arm muscles while applying Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS), Sham and No Stimulation. We compared IMC at Rest and unperturbed voluntary movement of the arm in neurotypical adults.</li>\n \n <li>Neck muscles showed increased shared neural drive at rest, only when GVS was applied. However, vestibular drive was suppressed during unperturbed voluntary isometric contractions and reaching movements of the arm.</li>\n \n <li>Vestibular drive to arm muscles did not increase when GVS was applied.</li>\n \n <li>We provide evidence that arm muscles do not receive vestibulospinal drive, excluding its contribution to unperturbed voluntary movement.</li>\n \n <li>These results could provide valuable insights into the vestibular contribution to motor impairments following neurological conditions such as stroke.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 9","pages":"2699-2711"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP287077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vestibular sensory system is among the oldest and most fundamental contributors to motor behaviour as it is critical to maintaining posture and balance. However such low-level motor responses could interfere with cortically mediated voluntary behaviour that naturally involves posture and balance. Consequently, it has been proposed that – much like the inhibition of reflex responses – vestibular contributions to motor output are ‘gated’ (dubbed vestibular suppression) to avoid undesirable self-perturbations during voluntary head movements. Here we demonstrate that such suppression also occurs for unperturbed voluntary arm function. Our evidence comes from comparing coherence at baseline (No Stimulation) and after Sham and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS). Specifically neck muscles showed shared neural drive (intermuscular coherence [IMC]), which increased with GVS – but not Sham – at Rest. This GVS-mediated increased coherence in neck muscles, however, was suppressed during voluntary isometric contractions and reaching movements of the arm on the same side as the GVS was applied. No changes were found in pairwise IMC during Sham (compared with No stimulation) or in arm muscles either at rest or during voluntary movement during GVS in neurotypical adults. In addition to extending vestibular suppression to unperturbed voluntary arm function, these results provide support for the common (yet unproven to our knowledge) notion that arm muscles do not receive vestibular neural drive during unperturbed voluntary movement. Moreover, these results shed light on the mechanisms that mediate competing descending outputs for voluntary function and serve as a baseline against which to compare potential task-dependent dysregulation of vestibular-mediated output to the neck and arms in stroke and neurological conditions.

Key points

  • The vestibular system is critical for correcting perturbations during voluntary movement.
  • During voluntary head movements, vestibular suppression occurs to avoid undesirable self-perturbations.
  • However, the contribution of the vestibular system to unperturbed voluntary arm movement remains unclear.
  • We used intermuscular coherence (IMC) to measure vestibulospinal drive to neck and arm muscles while applying Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS), Sham and No Stimulation. We compared IMC at Rest and unperturbed voluntary movement of the arm in neurotypical adults.
  • Neck muscles showed increased shared neural drive at rest, only when GVS was applied. However, vestibular drive was suppressed during unperturbed voluntary isometric contractions and reaching movements of the arm.
  • Vestibular drive to arm muscles did not increase when GVS was applied.
  • We provide evidence that arm muscles do not receive vestibulospinal drive, excluding its contribution to unperturbed voluntary movement.
  • These results could provide valuable insights into the vestibular contribution to motor impairments following neurological conditions such as stroke.

Abstract Image

前庭对运动输出的贡献也被手臂的自主动作所抑制。
前庭感觉系统是运动行为最古老和最基本的贡献者之一,因为它对保持姿势和平衡至关重要。然而,这种低水平的运动反应可能会干扰大脑皮层介导的自然涉及姿势和平衡的自愿行为。因此,有人提出,就像对反射反应的抑制一样,前庭对运动输出的贡献是“门控的”(称为前庭抑制),以避免在自愿头部运动期间出现不希望的自我干扰。在这里,我们证明这种抑制也发生在未受干扰的自愿臂功能。我们的证据来自比较基线(无刺激)和假手术和前庭电刺激(GVS)后的一致性。特别是颈部肌肉表现出共同的神经驱动(肌间相干性[IMC]),在静止状态下,这种神经驱动随着GVS而增加,而不是假手术。然而,这种GVS介导的颈部肌肉连贯性增强,在应用GVS时,在同侧手臂的自主等距收缩和伸展运动中被抑制。神经型成人在假手术期间(与无刺激相比)或在GVS期间休息或自主运动时手臂肌肉的两两IMC均未发现变化。除了将前庭神经抑制扩展到未受干扰的随意手臂功能之外,这些结果还为手臂肌肉在未受干扰的随意运动中不接受前庭神经驱动这一常见(据我们所知尚未证实)的概念提供了支持。此外,这些结果阐明了自愿功能的竞争性下行输出的调节机制,并作为比较中风和神经系统疾病中前庭介导的颈部和手臂输出的潜在任务依赖性失调的基线。重点:前庭系统是在自主运动中纠正扰动的关键。在自愿的头部运动中,前庭抑制发生以避免不希望的自我扰动。然而,前庭系统对不受干扰的自主手臂运动的贡献尚不清楚。在前庭电刺激(GVS)、假刺激和无刺激的情况下,我们使用肌间相干性(IMC)测量前庭脊髓对颈部和手臂肌肉的驱动。我们比较了神经正常的成人在休息时的IMC和不受干扰的手臂自主运动。只有在使用GVS时,颈部肌肉在休息时显示出增加的共享神经驱动。然而,在不受干扰的自主等距收缩和手臂伸展运动中,前庭驱动被抑制。应用GVS时,前庭对手臂肌肉的驱动没有增加。我们提供的证据表明,手臂肌肉不接受前庭脊髓驱动,排除其对不受干扰的自愿运动的贡献。这些结果可以为前庭对中风等神经系统疾病后运动损伤的贡献提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信