Agata Gabryelska, Szymon Turkiewicz, Adrian Gajewski, Julia Jaromirska, Dominik Strzelecki, Piotr Białasiewicz, Maciej Chałubiński, Marcin Sochal
{"title":"Assessment of continuous positive airway pressure effect on the circadian clock signaling pathway in obstructive sleep apnea patients.","authors":"Agata Gabryelska, Szymon Turkiewicz, Adrian Gajewski, Julia Jaromirska, Dominik Strzelecki, Piotr Białasiewicz, Maciej Chałubiński, Marcin Sochal","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88834-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with circadian rhythm dysregulation plausibly through affecting clock genes. The study's purpose was to investigate the effect of one-night continuous positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP treatment) on circadian clock genes: BMAL1, CLOCK, CRY1, and PER1 at mRNA and protein levels. The study included 30 OSA patients, who underwent diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) and next a one-night effective CPAP treatment with PSG monitoring (CPAP). The blood was collected in the evening before and the morning after PSG and CPAP. Protein levels and mRNA expression were measured using ELISA and qRT-PCR, respectively. The increase in PER1 expression was observed in the morning after compared to the evening before CPAP (p = 0.005); additionally, PER1 protein level decreased in the morning after CPAP compared to the morning after PSG (p = 0.035). In CLOCK protein levels significant changes were observed: an increase in the morning after CPAP compared to the morning after PSG (p = 0.049), an increase in the morning after CPAP compared to the evening before (p = 0.006), and an increase in difference between the morning after and evening before CPAP vs. difference between morning after and evening before PSG (p = 0.012). Obtained results suggest that even short-term effective CPAP treatment might reverse circadian clock signaling pathway disruption in OSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88834-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with circadian rhythm dysregulation plausibly through affecting clock genes. The study's purpose was to investigate the effect of one-night continuous positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP treatment) on circadian clock genes: BMAL1, CLOCK, CRY1, and PER1 at mRNA and protein levels. The study included 30 OSA patients, who underwent diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) and next a one-night effective CPAP treatment with PSG monitoring (CPAP). The blood was collected in the evening before and the morning after PSG and CPAP. Protein levels and mRNA expression were measured using ELISA and qRT-PCR, respectively. The increase in PER1 expression was observed in the morning after compared to the evening before CPAP (p = 0.005); additionally, PER1 protein level decreased in the morning after CPAP compared to the morning after PSG (p = 0.035). In CLOCK protein levels significant changes were observed: an increase in the morning after CPAP compared to the morning after PSG (p = 0.049), an increase in the morning after CPAP compared to the evening before (p = 0.006), and an increase in difference between the morning after and evening before CPAP vs. difference between morning after and evening before PSG (p = 0.012). Obtained results suggest that even short-term effective CPAP treatment might reverse circadian clock signaling pathway disruption in OSA.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.