Mariam Shah, Hannah Duncan, Helen Griffiths, Natasha Prescott, Rebecca Sweet, Isobel Heyman, Anna Roach, Anaïs d'Oelsnitz, Isabella Stokes, Zoe Berger, Sophie D Bennett, Roz Shafran
{"title":"Integration of Low Intensity Psychological Support for Children and Young People Receiving Cancer Services: A Qualitative Study of Staff Perspectives.","authors":"Mariam Shah, Hannah Duncan, Helen Griffiths, Natasha Prescott, Rebecca Sweet, Isobel Heyman, Anna Roach, Anaïs d'Oelsnitz, Isabella Stokes, Zoe Berger, Sophie D Bennett, Roz Shafran","doi":"10.1002/pon.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite children and young people (CYP) with cancer having elevated mental health needs, accessing evidence-based psychological support remains difficult. Delivering low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LICBT) to CYP with cancer could increase access to support. This qualitative study aimed to understand the views of key clinician stakeholders regarding the potential facilitators and barriers to implementation of LICBT in paediatric cancer services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 professionals working in paediatric hospital cancer services. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using framework analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Professionals indicated a potential need and utility for LICBT, and saw it as distinct from existing provision, addressing patient needs and filling a gap in services. Integration into the service and existing pathways was considered a key facilitator to successful implementation. Anticipated potential barriers included scepticism of LICBT efficacy due to the perceived high complexity of patient presentations and concerns about the relevance and suitability of existing manualized interventions for this population. LICBT practitioner ability to independently assess patient suitability for the intervention and to deliver LICBT effectively was also questioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cancer professionals' perceptions of LICBT indicate its potential use for the CYP cancer population to improve access to evidence-based psychological interventions. Incorporating the identified facilitators and barriers into implementation strategies, including information about the effectiveness of LICBT for young people with chronic illness will help to ensure effective integration of LICBT into routine paediatric healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 4","pages":"e70133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Despite children and young people (CYP) with cancer having elevated mental health needs, accessing evidence-based psychological support remains difficult. Delivering low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LICBT) to CYP with cancer could increase access to support. This qualitative study aimed to understand the views of key clinician stakeholders regarding the potential facilitators and barriers to implementation of LICBT in paediatric cancer services.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 professionals working in paediatric hospital cancer services. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using framework analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Results: Professionals indicated a potential need and utility for LICBT, and saw it as distinct from existing provision, addressing patient needs and filling a gap in services. Integration into the service and existing pathways was considered a key facilitator to successful implementation. Anticipated potential barriers included scepticism of LICBT efficacy due to the perceived high complexity of patient presentations and concerns about the relevance and suitability of existing manualized interventions for this population. LICBT practitioner ability to independently assess patient suitability for the intervention and to deliver LICBT effectively was also questioned.
Conclusions: Cancer professionals' perceptions of LICBT indicate its potential use for the CYP cancer population to improve access to evidence-based psychological interventions. Incorporating the identified facilitators and barriers into implementation strategies, including information about the effectiveness of LICBT for young people with chronic illness will help to ensure effective integration of LICBT into routine paediatric healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.