Impact of White Matter Hyperintensities on Nonverbal Cognition Through Structural Disconnections in Poststroke Aphasia.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ida Rangus, Natalie Busby, Alex Teghipco, Rebecca W Roth, Janina Wilmskoetter, Chris Rorden, Argye E Hillis, Dirk B den Ouden, Roger Newman-Norlund, Julius Fridriksson, Leonardo Bonilha
{"title":"Impact of White Matter Hyperintensities on Nonverbal Cognition Through Structural Disconnections in Poststroke Aphasia.","authors":"Ida Rangus, Natalie Busby, Alex Teghipco, Rebecca W Roth, Janina Wilmskoetter, Chris Rorden, Argye E Hillis, Dirk B den Ouden, Roger Newman-Norlund, Julius Fridriksson, Leonardo Bonilha","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonverbal cognitive deficits in poststroke aphasia remain poorly understood. They may result from direct stroke damage or disconnections of preserved cortical regions due to white matter injury, which may be worsened by white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Here, we examined the prevalence of nonverbal cognitive deficits in chronic poststroke aphasia and whether WMH-related disconnections contribute to these deficits beyond those caused by stroke lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with chronic left hemisphere ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were enrolled between 2012 and 2021. Nonverbal cognition was assessed using the Matrix Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Version IV, the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test, and the Kissing and Dancing Test. Stroke lesions and WMH masks were derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging scans. Disconnection severity from stroke lesions and WMH was quantified across association, commissural, and projection fibers using the Lesion Quantification Toolbox. Hierarchical regression models examined whether WMH-related disconnections explained additional variance in nonverbal cognitive deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 73 participants (mean age, 59.1±11.9 years; 61.6% male; mean time poststroke, 47.3±52.4 months), nonverbal cognitive deficits were common (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 27/58 [46.6%]; Pyramids and Palm Trees Test, 44/73 [60.3%]; Kissing and Dancing Test, 32/61 [52.5%]). Lesion-related commissural disconnections were associated with worse Kissing and Dancing Test performance (<i>r</i>[61]=-0.378; <i>P</i>=0.004), whereas WMH-related disconnections across all fiber types were linked to lower Pyramids and Palm Trees Test scores (<i>r</i>[73]=-0.392 to -0.462; <i>P</i><0.001). Interestingly, disconnection severity from stroke lesions was a weak predictor of nonverbal cognitive deficits, but adding disconnection severity from WMH significantly improved the prediction of nonverbal semantic memory as measured by the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> increase from 0.111 to 0.338; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disconnections from WMH contribute to nonverbal cognitive deficits, particularly in semantic memory, among individuals with poststroke aphasia. Considering WMH in poststroke aphasia research and rehabilitation may improve the understanding and treatment of cognitive impairments in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonverbal cognitive deficits in poststroke aphasia remain poorly understood. They may result from direct stroke damage or disconnections of preserved cortical regions due to white matter injury, which may be worsened by white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Here, we examined the prevalence of nonverbal cognitive deficits in chronic poststroke aphasia and whether WMH-related disconnections contribute to these deficits beyond those caused by stroke lesions.

Methods: Individuals with chronic left hemisphere ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were enrolled between 2012 and 2021. Nonverbal cognition was assessed using the Matrix Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Version IV, the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test, and the Kissing and Dancing Test. Stroke lesions and WMH masks were derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging scans. Disconnection severity from stroke lesions and WMH was quantified across association, commissural, and projection fibers using the Lesion Quantification Toolbox. Hierarchical regression models examined whether WMH-related disconnections explained additional variance in nonverbal cognitive deficits.

Results: Among 73 participants (mean age, 59.1±11.9 years; 61.6% male; mean time poststroke, 47.3±52.4 months), nonverbal cognitive deficits were common (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 27/58 [46.6%]; Pyramids and Palm Trees Test, 44/73 [60.3%]; Kissing and Dancing Test, 32/61 [52.5%]). Lesion-related commissural disconnections were associated with worse Kissing and Dancing Test performance (r[61]=-0.378; P=0.004), whereas WMH-related disconnections across all fiber types were linked to lower Pyramids and Palm Trees Test scores (r[73]=-0.392 to -0.462; P<0.001). Interestingly, disconnection severity from stroke lesions was a weak predictor of nonverbal cognitive deficits, but adding disconnection severity from WMH significantly improved the prediction of nonverbal semantic memory as measured by the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (R2 increase from 0.111 to 0.338; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Disconnections from WMH contribute to nonverbal cognitive deficits, particularly in semantic memory, among individuals with poststroke aphasia. Considering WMH in poststroke aphasia research and rehabilitation may improve the understanding and treatment of cognitive impairments in this population.

背景:人们对卒中后失语症的非语言认知障碍仍然知之甚少。它们可能是由于卒中直接损伤或白质损伤导致保存的皮质区域断开,而白质高密度(WMH)可能会加重这种损伤。在此,我们研究了慢性卒中后失语症患者非言语认知障碍的发生率,以及除了卒中病变引起的非言语认知障碍外,WMH 相关的断裂是否也是造成这些障碍的原因:2012年至2021年期间,慢性左半球缺血性或出血性脑卒中患者被纳入研究。使用韦氏成人智力量表第四版的矩阵子测试、金字塔和棕榈树测试以及接吻和跳舞测试评估非语言认知能力。脑卒中病灶和 WMH 掩膜来自结构性磁共振成像扫描。使用 "病变量化工具箱"(Lesion Quantification Toolbox)对联结纤维、共神经纤维和投射纤维与脑卒中病变和WMH的断裂严重程度进行量化。分层回归模型检验了与 WMH 相关的断裂是否能解释非语言认知障碍的额外差异:在 73 名参与者(平均年龄为 59.1±11.9 岁;61.6% 为男性;平均卒中后时间为 47.3±52.4 个月)中,非语言认知障碍很常见(韦氏成人智力量表,27/58 [46.6%];金字塔和棕榈树测试,44/73 [60.3%];接吻和跳舞测试,32/61 [52.5%])。与病变相关的神经丛断开与接吻和跳舞测试成绩较差有关(r[61]=-0.378;P=0.004),而与 WMH 相关的所有纤维类型的断开与金字塔和棕榈树测试成绩较低有关(r[73]=-0.392 到 -0.462;PR2 从 0.111 增加到 0.338;结论:与 WMH 相关的神经丛断开与接吻和跳舞测试成绩较差有关,而与 WMH 相关的所有纤维类型的断开与金字塔和棕榈树测试成绩较低有关:在脑卒中后失语症患者中,WMH的脱节导致了非语言认知障碍,尤其是语义记忆。在脑卒中后失语症的研究和康复中考虑 WMH 可能会提高对这一人群认知障碍的理解和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信