Suboptimal B-cell depletion is associated with progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with ocrelizumab.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1177/13524585251329849
Lisa Revie, Annika Jürjens, Maria Eveslage, Susan Trümpelmann, Valerie Teschner, Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Catharina C Gross, Jan D Lünemann, Jan Grosch, Catharina Korsukewitz, Heinz Wiendl, Luisa Klotz
{"title":"Suboptimal B-cell depletion is associated with progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with ocrelizumab.","authors":"Lisa Revie, Annika Jürjens, Maria Eveslage, Susan Trümpelmann, Valerie Teschner, Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Catharina C Gross, Jan D Lünemann, Jan Grosch, Catharina Korsukewitz, Heinz Wiendl, Luisa Klotz","doi":"10.1177/13524585251329849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While treatment with ocrelizumab has proven effective in preventing relapse-associated worsening (RAW) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), a significant number of patients experience progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the association between B-cell depletion status and the risk of disability accumulation in RMS patients receiving ocrelizumab treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric cohort study of 148 RMS patients (2017-2023), we categorized participants into three groups: no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), evidence of disease activity (EDA), and PIRA. B-cell counts were measured every 6-12 months, with suboptimal depletion defined as ⩾10 CD19+ B-cells/µL. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models analyzed the relationship between B-cell depletion and disability progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 148 patients, 70 (47%) achieved NEDA, 51 (34%) showed EDA, and 25 (17%) developed PIRA. NEDA patients demonstrated significantly lower B-cell counts compared to EDA (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and PIRA (<i>p</i> < 0.001) groups. Insufficient B-cell depletion was the strongest PIRA predictor (OR 3.73, 95% CI: 2.50-5.43, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and increased EDSS progression risk (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIRA occurs in the context of suboptimal B-cell depletion in RMS patients, highlighting the need for close monitoring and potential adjustment of infusion intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"813-820"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251329849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While treatment with ocrelizumab has proven effective in preventing relapse-associated worsening (RAW) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), a significant number of patients experience progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA).

Objectives: To investigate the association between B-cell depletion status and the risk of disability accumulation in RMS patients receiving ocrelizumab treatment.

Methods: In this monocentric cohort study of 148 RMS patients (2017-2023), we categorized participants into three groups: no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), evidence of disease activity (EDA), and PIRA. B-cell counts were measured every 6-12 months, with suboptimal depletion defined as ⩾10 CD19+ B-cells/µL. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models analyzed the relationship between B-cell depletion and disability progression.

Results: Of 148 patients, 70 (47%) achieved NEDA, 51 (34%) showed EDA, and 25 (17%) developed PIRA. NEDA patients demonstrated significantly lower B-cell counts compared to EDA (p < 0.01) and PIRA (p < 0.001) groups. Insufficient B-cell depletion was the strongest PIRA predictor (OR 3.73, 95% CI: 2.50-5.43, p < 0.001) and increased EDSS progression risk (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.97, p = 0.039).

Conclusions: PIRA occurs in the context of suboptimal B-cell depletion in RMS patients, highlighting the need for close monitoring and potential adjustment of infusion intervals.

在接受ocrelizumab治疗的多发性硬化症患者中,次优b细胞消耗与独立于复发活动的进展相关。
背景:虽然ocrelizumab治疗已被证明可有效预防复发性多发性硬化症(RMS)的复发相关恶化(RAW),但相当多的患者经历了独立于复发活动(PIRA)的进展。目的:研究接受ocrelizumab治疗的RMS患者b细胞耗竭状态与残疾积累风险之间的关系。方法:在这项纳入148例RMS患者(2017-2023)的单中心队列研究中,我们将参与者分为三组:无疾病活动证据(NEDA)、有疾病活动证据(EDA)和PIRA。每6-12个月测量一次b细胞计数,次优消耗定义为小于10个CD19+ b细胞/µL。Logistic回归和Cox比例风险模型分析了b细胞耗竭和残疾进展之间的关系。结果:148例患者中,NEDA达到70例(47%),EDA 51例(34%),PIRA 25例(17%)。与EDA相比,NEDA患者的b细胞计数明显降低(p p p p = 0.039)。结论:PIRA发生在RMS患者的次优b细胞消耗的背景下,突出了密切监测和调整输注间隔的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信