Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Brain Injury: Physiological Relationships and Outcome.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Adam I Pelah, Agnieszka Kazimierska, Marek Czosnyka, Gregory W J Hawryluk
{"title":"Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Brain Injury: Physiological Relationships and Outcome.","authors":"Adam I Pelah, Agnieszka Kazimierska, Marek Czosnyka, Gregory W J Hawryluk","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The priority for measuring and optimizing physiological metrics in brain injury care remains to be determined. Calculating and targeting optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) is an emerging treatment paradigm, but its association with other parameters and outcome is uncertain. A previous analysis of 22 patients found that brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) peaked when CPP values were near CPPopt. This study sought to validate those findings using a distinct, larger cohort. It also studied the relationship between CPPopt and physiological parameters related to intracranial dynamics and with neurological outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PbtO2, intracranial pressure (ICP), and arterial blood pressure data were collected during a 15-year period from 432 brain injury patients at 4 cooperating trauma centers. CPPopt was retrospectively computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 36 years (n = 316), the median admission Glasgow coma score was 6 (n = 323), and 75% of the patients were men (n = 324). In aggregate data, PbtO2 peaked at CPP values near CPPopt (+/- 2 mm Hg). Proportion of out-of-range ICP measurements (>22 mm Hg) and positive pressure reactivity index were higher in dying and unfavorable outcome groups, and increased with worsening outcome. Time spent near CPPopt was significantly higher in dying patients but not in patients with unfavorable outcome. Time near CPPopt was, however, correlated with improving outcome. Proportion of out-of-range PbtO2 (<20 mm Hg) was not associated with outcome or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results verify CPPopt as physiologically significant and that in aggregate data achievement of CPPopt is associated with optimized PbtO2. Compliance with the ICP treatment threshold was, though, the only modifiable physiological variable associated with both functional outcome and mortality. Our results support optimization of ICP with highest priority. Further study is required in patients in whom CPPopt is specifically targeted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The priority for measuring and optimizing physiological metrics in brain injury care remains to be determined. Calculating and targeting optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) is an emerging treatment paradigm, but its association with other parameters and outcome is uncertain. A previous analysis of 22 patients found that brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) peaked when CPP values were near CPPopt. This study sought to validate those findings using a distinct, larger cohort. It also studied the relationship between CPPopt and physiological parameters related to intracranial dynamics and with neurological outcome.

Methods: PbtO2, intracranial pressure (ICP), and arterial blood pressure data were collected during a 15-year period from 432 brain injury patients at 4 cooperating trauma centers. CPPopt was retrospectively computed.

Results: The median age was 36 years (n = 316), the median admission Glasgow coma score was 6 (n = 323), and 75% of the patients were men (n = 324). In aggregate data, PbtO2 peaked at CPP values near CPPopt (+/- 2 mm Hg). Proportion of out-of-range ICP measurements (>22 mm Hg) and positive pressure reactivity index were higher in dying and unfavorable outcome groups, and increased with worsening outcome. Time spent near CPPopt was significantly higher in dying patients but not in patients with unfavorable outcome. Time near CPPopt was, however, correlated with improving outcome. Proportion of out-of-range PbtO2 (<20 mm Hg) was not associated with outcome or mortality.

Conclusion: The results verify CPPopt as physiologically significant and that in aggregate data achievement of CPPopt is associated with optimized PbtO2. Compliance with the ICP treatment threshold was, though, the only modifiable physiological variable associated with both functional outcome and mortality. Our results support optimization of ICP with highest priority. Further study is required in patients in whom CPPopt is specifically targeted.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信